Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

What did Malaysia Contribute to the Worldwide Computer Science and Information Technology in the 1990s?

Gu, Yinian, and Zainab A.N., (2001) What did Malaysia Contribute to the Worldwide Computer Science and Information Technology in the 1990s? In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, Vol.2. Edited by Mari Davis, Concepcion S. Wilson. Sydnye: Bibliometric & Informetric Research Group, 2001. ISBN. 0733418201, 16-20 July 2001, Sydney, Australia.

Full text not available from this repository.

Affiliations

University of Malaya, Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, MLIS Programme

Abstract

The results presented an overview of the worldwide status of publication productivity of Malaysian computer science and information technology researchers for the period 1990- 1999 and ascertained the main interests of academic activity of these experts. The data for this study was retrieved from 3 international web-based databases, i.e., Ei COMPENDEX (1990-2001), lEL (lEE/IEEE Electronic Library) (1988-2001), and INSPEC (1969-2001). The process of data collection involved downloading all bibliographic records of Malaysian authors, according to the fields of Author Affiliations in COMPENDEX and Institution in INSPEC as reflected by the affiliation status of only the first author, and restricting the year of publication between 1990 and 1999. Duphcate records were verified and eliminated. Malaysian Research and Development Classification System (MRDCS) (1998) produced by the Malaysian Science and Technology hiformation Centre (MASTIC) was applied when identifying research subjects. Bibliometric analysis, by means of the
Bibliometrics Toolbox (Version 1.4) developed by TA. Brooks in 1987, and regression analysis were employed to show and determine the trend and character of the literatures collected. A total of 461 publications, which consisted of 263 (571%) conference papers, 197 (42.7%) journal articles and 1 (0.2%) monographs chapters were contributed between 1990 and 1999. According to each annual amount of contributions, Malaysian research publication productivity averaged 46.1 per annum, which begun slowly between 1990 and 1993 (90, 19.5%) followed by rapid growth between 1994 and 1999 (371, 80.5%) publications. An upward trend for both annual and cumulative total of publication production was expected to continue in the future. However, the negative effect of the age of research groups on productivity must be seriously noted as a decline was indicated in 1999. A total of 547 unique Malaysian authors contributed the 461 publications in computer science and information technology during 1990 to 1999. This figure made up 0.6 per cent of the total number of 87, 000 IT workers in Malaysia by the end of 1998 {Mid-Term Review of the Seventh Malaysia Plan 1996-2000, 1999). Each author shared an average of 0.84 publications. Less than one third of the 547 authors contributed two or more papers/articles and the majority were one time contributors. Malaysian authors in this field had various interests of research, publication in a wide variety of subject areas, indicating a varied and broad research interests. The productive author’s position is fould to be corelated to their publication productivity. The three most productive institutions in this field were Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Universiti Sains Malaysia and Universiti Malaya. [brace not closed]

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Keywords:Computer science researchers, publication productivity, bibliometrics
Subjects:Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Science
ID Code:1011

1996 Malaysian Science and Technology Indicators Report (1998). In: http:// www/mastic.gov.my/mastic/pages/snHnd/default.htm. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment, Malaysia.

1996 National Survey of Research and Development (Revised Version) (1998). In: http:// www.mastic.gov.my/mastic/pages/semd96/mdl.htm. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment, Malaysia.

Abdullah, S. (1995). Scientific and technical information: impetus for development in Southeast Asia, IntemationalForum on Information and Documentation, 20: 3-13.

Arunachalam, Subbiah and Garg, Kailash C. (1986). Science on the periphery – a scientometric analysis of science in the ASEAN coxxntnts, Joumal of Information Science, 12: 105-17.

Blume, S.S. and Sinclair, Ruth (1973). Chemists in British universities: a study of the reward system in science, American Sociological Review, 38:126-38.

Bordons, M.; Gomez, L; Femandez, M.T.; Zulueta, M.A. and Mendez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and intemational scientific collaboration in biomedical research, Scientometrics, 37: 279-95.

Budd, John (1986). Characteristics of written scholarship in American literature: a citation study. Library and Information Science Research, 8:189-211.

Cunningham, S.J. and Dillon, S.M. (1997). Authorship patterns in information systems. Scientometrics, 39: 19-27.

Davis, C.H. and Eisemon, TO. (1989). Mainstream and non-mainstream scientific Uterature in four peripheral Asian scientific communities, Scientometrics, 15: 215-39.

Eastman, CaroUne M. (1989). Research productivity and breadth of interest revisited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40: 359-60.

Fitschi, A. et al (1980). Effects of size within two institut ion of sociology.’ Temational Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education, 4:19.

Fussier, Herman H. (1949). Characteristics of the research literature used by chemists and physicists in the United States, Library Quarterly, 19: 19-35.

Handayani, Sri Wening, (1995). Organizational structure and the production of agricultural knowledge in Indonesia, Ph.D. diss., University of Missouri – Columbia.

Heinzkill, Richard (1980). Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English literary journals. Library Quarterly, 50: 352-65.

Malaysian Research and Development Classification System (Third Edition) (1998), In:http://www.mastic.gov.my/mastic/pages/rndc/RnD.htm. Kuala Lumpur: Mai aj Science and Technology Information Centre.

Melin, Goran, (1997). Co-production of scientific knowledge: research collaboration between countries, universities and individuals (collaboration, bibliometrics), Fil.Dr. diss., Umea Universitet (Sweden).

Mid-Term Review of the Seventh Malaysia Plan 1996-2000 (1999). Ki la I

Mid-Term Review of the Seventh Malaysia Plan 1996-2000 (1999). Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia.

Nath, Ravinder and Jackson, Wade M. (1991). Productivity of management information systems researchers: does Lotka’s Law apply?. Information Processing & Management, 27: 203-09.

Popovidi, Charles J. (1975). Business management research characteristic and collection evaluation: a citation analysis of dissertations, ERIC Document. EDI36835.

Rodriguez, K. (1994). Barriers to information technology in Latin America and the Caribbean: some options. Electronic Library, 12: 29-35.

Shepard, H.A. (1956). Creativity in R/D teams. Research and Engineering, (October): 10-13.

Stankiiewicz, R. (1979). The size and age of Swedish academic research groups and their scientific performance. In: Frank M. Andrews (ed.). Scientific productivity: the effectiveness of research groups in six countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stern, Madeleine (1983). Characteristics of the literature of literary scholarship. College and Research Libraries, AA: 199-209.

Subramanyam, K. (1984). Research productivity and breadth of interest of computer scientists, Joumal of the American Society for Information Science, 35: 369-71.

Vimala, V. and Reddy, V.P. (1996). Authorship pattern and collaborative research in the field of zoology, Malaysian Joumal of Library & Information Science, 1: 43-50.

Wells, W.R (1962). Group age and scientific performance, Ph.D. diss.. University of Michigan.

Wells, W.R and Pelz, D.C. (1966). Groups. In: Pelz, D.C. and Andrews, RM., Scientists z« organizations. New York: Wiley.

Zainab A.N. (1999). Personal, academic and departmental correlates of research productivity: a review of literature, Malaysian Joumal of Library & Information Science, 4: 73-110.

Repository Staff Only: item control page