Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Peranan kokurikulum dalam pembangunan kemahiran generik

Ahmad bin Esa, and Jailani bin Md Yunos, and Noraini binti Kaprawi, (2004) Peranan kokurikulum dalam pembangunan kemahiran generik. Jurnal Sains Sosial KUiTTHO, 2 (1). pp. 81-94.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
76Kb

Affiliations

Kolej Universiti Teknologi Tun Hussein Onn
Kolej Universiti Teknologi Tun Hussein Onn
Kolej Universiti Teknologi Tun Hussein Onn

Abstract

In Malaysian Education system and globally, co-curriculum is complementary to the curriculum. Co-curriculum and curriculum are two systems that developed human resource which had a balanced physical, emotional, spiritual and intellectual. Co-curricular has a role and influenced either directly or indirectly in the development of individuals. However, in terms of the balanced interests, often occur that the role and importance of co-curricular had been ignored to either intentionally or unintentionally. Winery, the role and importance of co-co-curricular had been taken account for quite extensive purposes. Among that are to develop countries through the nurturing of national integration among students, to foster community life and to build up individual self-development with a variety of skills through the co-curricular teaching and learning process. Hence, the purpose of this article is trying to explain the relationship between co-curricular with the generic skills through the descriptive analysis that based on writing and research in the previous generic skills and co-curricular discipline. It is believed that co-curriculum had a relationship with the developing of generic skills among students. Therefore, it is appropriate that co-curricular must be in the right placed in the education system in Malaysia.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:co=curriculum, Education, Malaysia
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:10300

Ab. Alim Abdul Rahim (1999). Pengurusan Kokurikulum. Kuala Lumpur: Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd.

Abd. Hamid Othman (1998). “Aktiviti Ko-Kurikulum Dalam Konteks KeIslaman.” Kertas Kerja Koleksi Arkib Negara Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Hal Ehwal Islam, Jabatan Perdana Menteri.

Adnan Kamis (1993). “Aktiviti Kokurikulum Dasar KBSM: Ke Arah Kemantapan Insan Seimbang.” Dalam Adnan Kamis (1993). Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah:Pandangan Dan Maklum Balas. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Ariffin Ba’ada (1996). “Kajian Tentang Aktiviti Pembelajaran Dan Sikap Terhadap Sains Dengan Pemerolehan Kemahiran Generik Dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains Tingkatan Empat. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan.

Bahagian Kurikulum Teknikal dan Vokasional (2000). Politeknik-Politeknik Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia: Kokurikulum. Kuala Lumpur: Jabatan Pendidikan Teknikal, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Che Aziz Jaafar dan Aminuddin Yusof (2002). “Perlunya Kokurikulum Dalam Sistem Pendidikan Sekolah.” Dalam Mohd. Sofian Omar Fauzee, Aminuddin Yusof dan Borhan Yusof (2002). Kokurikulum Peranan Dan Implikasi. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications and Distributors Sdn. Bhd.

Ensiklopedia Global, Edisi Milinium, Jilid 18, Kamus A - K (2001). Kuala Lumpur:SmartGenie Corporation Sdn. Bhd.

Flintridge Sacred Heart Academy (2003). “Co-Curricular Program.” California: Flintridge Sacred Heart Academy (2003).

Gardner, H. (1982). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books, Inc..

Glover, D. et. al (2000). “The Introduction of Key Skills into Schools: Core or Casualty? Journal of Vocational Education and Training. Vol. 52. No. 1. M.s. 63-77.

Greder, D. L. (2001). “Co-Curricular Programs.” Illionis: Universiti Wesleyan Illionis.

Hepburn, P. (2002). “Vice-Chancellor’s List Induction Ceremony Tuesday, 10 September 2002 Vote of Thanks.” http://otl.curtin.edu.au/vclist/voteofthanks102.html . Dicapai pada 15 Februari 2002.

Imel, S. (1999). “Work Force Education: Beyond Technical Skills.” The Ohio State University.

Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam. “Istilah Perkhidmatan Awam.” http://www.jpa.gov.my/daftar/jPenyelidikanPerancangan.htm . Dicapai pada 31 Mac 2003.

Kamus Dewan Edisi Ketiga (2000). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka.

Kearns, P. (2001). Generic Skills for the New Economy. Kensington Park: National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) Ltd..

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2000). “Kokurikulum.” http://myschoolnet.ppk.kpm.my/ Dicapai pada 17 Februari2003.

Matthews, B. (2000). “Co-Curricular Philosophy.” Bunbury: Bunbury Cathedral Grammar School.

Maznah Ibrahim (2002). “Penglibatan Pelajar Melayu Dalam Aktiviti Kerja Kumpulan: Cabaran Menghadapi Era

Globalisasi.” Dalam PKAUKM (2002). Prosiding Simposium Melayu Malaysia. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Mohd. Yusop Ab. Hadi (2003). “ Measuring the infusing of Generic Skills in Teaching Process as an Effort to Develop K-Workers Skills upon Students: A Case Study among the Educators.” Dalam Mokhtar Ismail, et. al (2003). Proceeding 2nd International Conference On Measurement and Evaluation in Education (ICMEE) 2003. Penang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.

NCVER’s Glosorry of Australian VET Training Terms (2003). “Generic Skills.” http://www.ncver.edu.au/generic.htm. Dicapai pada 24 Jun 2003.

Nur Aishah Abdullah dan Mohd Sofian Omar Fauzee (2002). “Senaman dan Kesejahteraan Diri.” Dalam Mohd Sofian Omar Fauzee (2002). Psikologi Sukan: Konsep Dalam Latihan Dan Pengajaran Sukan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications and Distributors Sdn. Bhd.

Oliver, R. (2000). “ Generic Skills Development Through Problem-Based Learning Activities.” http://cea.curtin.edu.au/tlf2000/abstracts/oliverr2.html. Dicapai pada 15 Februari 2003.

Omardin Ashaari (1999). Pengurusan Persatuan: Suatu Panduan Lengkap. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications and Distributors Sdn. Bhd.

Pejabat Pendidikan Daerah Manjung (2000). “Kokurikulum.” http://mercury.igalaksi.com/ppdmanjung/kokuri.htm. Dicapai pada 17 Februari 2003.

Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (1995). “Kertas Konsep Kemahiran Generik.” Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Radloff, A. dan De La Harpe, B. (2002). “Issues in Integrating Generic Skills into the Curriculum.” Dalam Proceedings of the 11th Annual Teaching Learning Forum. Perth: Edith Cowan University.

Reigeluth, M. (1999). “Modul 7: Generic Skills. http://www.indiana.edu/~idtheory/methods/m7a.html . Dicapai pada 13 Februari 2003.

Smigiel, H. dan Merritt, L. (1999). “A New Approach to Communication Training in the Workplace.” Journal of Vocational Education and Training. Vol. 51. N.4. M.s 629-640.

Sumarni Dahrir dan Borhan Yusof (2002). “Matlamat Dan Implikasi Kokurikulum Terhadap Pelajar.” Dalam Mohd. Sofian Omar Fauzee, Aminuddin Yusof dan Borhan Yusof (2002). Kokurikulum Peranan Dan Implikasi. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications and Distributors Sdn. Bhd..

Suriati Chek Pi dan Mohd. Sofian Omar Fauzee (2002). “Kokurikulum Menjana Ke Arah Keseimbangan Pelajar .” Dalam Mohd. Sofian Omar Fauzee, Aminuddin Yusof dan Borhan Yusof (2002). Kokurikulum Peranan Dan Implikasi. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications and Distributors Sdn. Bhd.

Teng Bon Teng (1984). Pendidikan Jasmani Di Sekolah Rendah (Edisi ke-2). Petaling Jaya: Longman Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.

Torek Sulong (2001). “Kelantan Yakin Program Kokurikulum Berkesan.” http://www.cikgu.net.my/malay/berita/moreberita.php3?id=467. Dicapai pada 17 Februari 2003.

Tuan Ismail Tuan Soh (1999). “Kokurikulum Dari Perspektif Falsafah Pendidikan Negara.” Dalam Fakulti Pendidikan, UKM (1999). Prosiding Isu-Isu Pendidikan Negara. Bangi: Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Universiti ICFAI (2003). “Co-Curricular & Extra-Curricular Activities.” Hyderabad: Universiti ICFAI. http://www.icfai.org/ugprograms/main/Co_Curricular_. Dicapai pada 20 Mac 2003.

Upward, H. (1989). “Enterprise in Action.” Dalam Warwick, D. (1989). Linking Schools and Industry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Ltd.

Vasudevan T. Arosoo (1988). Kegiatan Ko-Kurikulum: Penyeliaan Dan Pentadbiran. Selangor: Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd.

Wackerle Career and Leadership Center (2002). Co-Curricular Profile a Leadership & Involvement resume-a tool for future employment.” Illionis: Monmouth College.

Wan Abd. Aziz Wan Mohd Akib dan rakan-rakan (1999). “Ko-Kurikulum: Mendokong Ke Arah Penerapan Globalisasi Pendidikan.” Dalam Prosiding Konvensyen Pendidikan UTM ’99. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Yusoff Ismail (1993). “Peranan Pendidikan Jasmani Dalam KBSM.” Dalam Adnan Kamis (1993). Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah: Pandangan dan Maklum Balas. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Zaimi Abu Bakar (1996). “The Perceptions of Secondary School Teachers Regarding The Value of Co-Curricular Activities.”: Universitiy of Houston dan Institut Aminuddin Baki: Sarjana Pendidikan.

Zainuddin Mohamad dan Mohd Sofian Omar Fauzee (2002). “Penetapan Matlamat.” Dalam Mohd Sofian Omar Fauzee (2002). Psikologi Sukan: Konsep Dalam Latihan Dan Pengajaran Sukan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications and Distributors Sdn. Bhd.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.