Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Membangun kemahiran generik menerusi persatuan dan kelab di politeknik Malaysia

Ahmad Esa, and Jailani Md Yunos, and Noraini Kaprawi, (2005) Membangun kemahiran generik menerusi persatuan dan kelab di politeknik Malaysia. Journal Personalia Pelajar (9). pp. 59-76. ISSN 0128-2735

[img]PDF - Registered users only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
100Kb

Affiliations

Kolej Universiti Teknologi Tun Hussein Onn
Kolej Universiti Teknologi Tun Hussein Onn
Kolej Universiti Teknologi Tun Hussein Onn

Abstract

This working paper tries to identify the developing of the generic skills among the students at the polytechnic through their society and club activities. The design of the research that had been used is descriptive method which involved the lectures and the students from six polytechnics in Malaysia. The instrument that had been used is the Generic Skills Questionnaire Form constructed by the researcher. The data had been analyzed using the SPSS program version 11.5. The result of the research shows that through society and club activities the students not only get the benefit for their social activities but also a few others generic skills such as communication skills, solving problems, making decisions, leadership, management, interpersonal and working in group. The result from the research that had been done shows that society and club activities among the technical students are important because it also help towards the generic skills that they will implement in their career.

Kertas kerja ini bertujuan mengenal pasti pembangunan kemahiran generik di kalangan pelajar di politeknik menerusi kegiatan persatuan dan kelab. Reka bentuk penyelidikan yang digunakan ialah kajian deskriptif yang melibatkan pensyarah dan pelajar di enam buah politeknik di Malaysia. Instrumen yang digunakan ialah Borang Soal Selidik Kemahiran Generik yang dibina sendiri oleh penyelidik. Data-data yang telah diperoleh, dianalisis dengan menggunakan program SPSS versi 11.5. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan menerusi kegiatan persatuan dan kelab pelajar bukan sahaja mendapat faedah daripada segi bersosialisasi tetapi pelajar turut menerima beberapa kemahiran generik seperti kemahiran berkomunikasi, penyelesaian masalah, membuat keputusan, kepimpinan, pengurusan, interpersonal dan bekerja dalam kumpulan. Hasil kajian yang telah dijalankan membuktikan bahawa kegiatan persatuan dan kelab di kalangan pelajar aliran teknik adalah penting kerana turut menyumbang kepada pembangunan kemahiran generik yang dapat mereka aplikasikan apabila menceburi alam pekerjaan.

Item Type:Journal
Additional Information:First volume, Bil. 1 (Jun 1989)-
Keywords:Generic skills, Universities and colleges, Students, clubs and societies
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:10768

Abbott, I. 1997. Why Do We Have to Do Key Skills? Student Views about General National Vocational Qualifications. Journal of Vocational Education and Training. Vol. 49. No. 4. M.s. 617-624.

Adnan Kamis.1993.Aktiviti Kokurikulum Dasar KBSM: Ke Arah Kemantapan Insan Seimbang. DalamAdnan Kamis.1993. Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah: Pandangan Dan Maklum Balas. Bangi: UKM. 260 – 267.

Ahamad Sipon.2003. Program Pendidikan Teknikal/Vokasional Oleh Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia Bagi Menangani Cabaran Masa Depan. Kertas Ucap Utama Persidangan Kebangsaan Pendidikan Dan Latihan Teknik Dan Vokasional. 29-30. Julai 2004, Hotel Caterina, Batu Pahat. Tidak diterbitkan.

California State University.1994. University Policy Manual: Co-Curricular Courses. Sacramento: California State University. http://www.csus.edu/acaf/univmanual/cocurcres.htm . Dicapai pada 22 Mac 2003.

Callan, V. J. 2003. Generic Skills: Understanding Vocational Education and Training Teacher and Student Attitudes. Kensingston Road: NCVER.

Dawe, S. 2002. Focusing on Generic Skills in Training Packages. Kengsington Road: NCVER.

Ismail Bakar. 2003. Penjuruteraan Semula Pendidikan Teknik Vokasional: Satu Cabaran Pemikiran Dan Tinjauan. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknikal. Jilid 3, No. 1-2004.24-36.

Kearns, P. 2001. Generic Skills for the New Economy. Kensington Park : National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) Ltd. 41 -64.

Keystone Central School District.2002. Philosophy of Co-Curricular Activities http://www.kcsd.k12.pa.us/guides/hs/cocurr.html . Dicapai pada 22 Mac, 2003.

Matthews, B. 2000. Co-Curricular Philosophy. Bunbury: Bunbury Cathedral Grammar School. http://www.begs.wa.edu.au/home/co_curricalar.htm . Dicapai pada 21 Mac 2003.

Michigan State Universiti.1988. Opportunities for Renewal: The Report of the Council to Review Undergraduate Education. Michigan: East Lansing. 42-50.

Mohamad Nor Mohamad Taib.1990. Pandangan Pelajar Dan Ibu Bapa Terhadap Gerakerja Kokurikulum Sekolah Menengah. Universiti Malaya: Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan.

Mustafa Kamal Ali.2000. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penglibatan Pelajar-Pelajar Melayu Tingkatan 4 Dalam Aktiviti Kokurikulum Di Rancangan Felda Daerah Segamat Selatan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda. National Academy Foundation.2001. Co-Curricular Enhancements. USA: National Academy Foundation.

http://nafnetwork.net/resources/NAFResourcesCenter/cocurricular. Dicapai pada 23 Mac 2003.

NCVER’s Glosorry of Australian VET Training Terms.2003. Generic Skills.

http://www.ncver.edu.au/generic.htm. Dicapai pada 24 Jun 2003.

Potrafka, R. M. et. al. 1997. The World Wide Web, Student Organizations, and Co-Curricular Transcripts. University of Missouri- Rolla. 1-12.

Seo, Andy K.H.2003. Smart Partnership Between Vocational Technical Training Institutions with the Industry in Creating Skill Workers. Kertas Kerja Persidangan Kebangsaan Pendidikan Dan Latihan Teknik Dan Vokasional. 29-30 Julai 2004 di Hotel Caterina, Batu Pahat. Tidak diterbitkan.

Strom, B. T. 1996. “The Role of Philosophy in Education – for - Work.” Journal of Industrial Teacher Education. Vol. 33. No. 2. 77-82.

Switzer, R. 2002. Co-Curricular Program. Busselton: Georgiana Molloy Anglican School. http://www.gmas.wa.edu.au/co-curriculum.htm . Dicapai pada 22 Mac 2003.

Teng Bon Tong.1984. Pendidikan Jasmani Di Sekolah Rendah (Edisi ke-2). Petaling Jaya: Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. 1-4.

Vasudevan T. Arosoo.1988. Kegiatan Ko-Kurikulum: Penyeliaan Dan Pentadbiran. Selangor: Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd.1-8.

Walker, V. N. 2002. Office of Co-Curricular Life. Sweet Briar: Sweet Briar College. http://sbc.edu/cocurricular/about/ . Dicapai pada 20 Mac 2003.

Warwick, D. 1989. Interpretation and Aims.” Dalam Warwick, D. 1989. “Linking Schools and Industry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.

Wirth, A. G. 1992. Education and Work for the Year 2000: Choices We Face. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Yusoff Ismail 1993. Peranan Pendidikan Jasmani Dalam KBSM. Dalam Adnan Kamis 1993. Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah: Pandangan Dan Maklum Balas. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 235-243.

Repository Staff Only: item control page