Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Best practices used by Malaysian environmental websites: a comparison study

Aida Nasirah Abdullah, and Hanipah Husin, and Hazmilah Hasan, and Kalthom Husain, and Aziz Yahya, (2010) Best practices used by Malaysian environmental websites: a comparison study. Journal of Human Capital Development, 3 (1). pp. 69-84. ISSN 1985-7012

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
433Kb

Official URL: http://jhcd.utem.edu.my

Affiliations

Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka

Abstract

This research is the first attempt to cover best practices for environmental websites in Malaysia. We chose five environmental NGOs in Malaysia ENGOMs) for a case study, and evaluated website practices they used to communicate their missions and goals. A quantitative data was collected and analysed via content analysis of the five ENGOM websites. The content analysis of the websites sought to determine, identify and assess the best practices of the environmental websites features. The research questions focused on the use of online communication (OC) by ENGOMs in order to advocate specific environmental issues and potentially mobilise government or public action on these issues. How do the ENGOMs effectively use the website to communicate their organisations’ missions and goals? We
conducted an extensive literature review to identify features of websites such as the usefulness of information, interactivity, navigability, and design that have been evaluated as important by previous researchers. Then we used these features as a basis for assessing the effectiveness of the practices of environmental websites in Malaysia. The web content analysis demonstrates that all the five ENGOMs had relatively small websites, providing useful information such as mission, goals, and organisation background. Most of the global issues advocated by them were meant to mobilise support and action. This is considered a rather ineffective use of OC. Interactivity features available across their websites were categorised at a ‘low’ level of utilisation. The ENGOMs did not fully utilise them for the purpose of conducting online campaigns and encouraging dialogue. The navigability of the five ENGOMs’ websites was categorised at a ‘good’ level,
given that the majority of them provided good and easy navigation. The majority of the websites also met the ‘well designed’ requirements. Overall, the five ENGOMs have delivered most of the best practise features expected
in effective environmental websites; Malaysian Nature Society (MNS) was ranked as the best website, while Sahabat Alam Malaysia (SAM) is at the opposite end of the spectrum. ENGOMs’ employees expressed views about enhancing their websites to be more interactive in the future. Financial constraints seemed to be the biggest problem faced by all ENGOMs in their endeavour to develop their websites. However, a key finding is that the websites with more resources did not use them as effectively as websites with
fewer resources. Thus, one or two conscientious and well trained employees could be successful with limited resources.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:online communication, interactivity, navigation, web design, online campaigns.
Subjects:H Social Sciences, Economics, Sociology
ID Code:11352

Bauer, C. & Scharl, A. (2000). Quantitative of website content and structure. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 10(1), 31- 43.

Beierle, T. (2000). Old strategy and new tactics drive environmental advocacy on the Internet. Retrieved December 5, 2005, from http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itgic/1100/ijge/gjo6.htm.

Chen, H. M. & Sheldon, P. J. (1997). Destination of information systems: design issues (2), 151-176.

Duignan, P. (n.d.). What is best practice? Retrieved October 22, 2009 at http://knol.google.com/k/what-is-best-practice.

Ghose, S. & Dou, W. (1998). Interactive functions and their impacts on the appeal of Interest present sites. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(2),29-43.

Heimlich, J. E. & Wang, K. (1999). Evaluating the content of Web sites: Guidelines for educators. Columbus: Environmental Education and Training Partnership (EETAP), Ohio State University. Retrieved August 21,2006, from http://www.epa.gov/enviroed/pdf/evawebsites.pdf.

Ho, J. (1997). Evaluating the World Wide Web: a global study of commercial sites, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. Retrieved June,3, 2007 from www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issues1/ho.html.

Ivory, M. Y. (2003). Automated website evaluation: Researchers’ and practitioners’ perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

Jackson, M. H. (1997). Assessing the structure of ommunication on the World Wide Web. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(1).Retrieved July 15, 2006, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/jackson.html.

Katz, J. E. (1994). Online or not, newspaper suck. Wired, September, 50-58.

Martin, C. (1997). The digital estate: strategies for completing, surviving, and thriving in an Internet worked world. NJ, New York: Mc Graw Hill.ISSN: 1985-7012 Vol. 3 No. 1 January - June 2010

McLachlan, K. (2002). WWW cyberguide ratings for website design. Retrieved February 2, 2006, from www.cyberbee.com/guides.html.

McMillan, S. J. (2000). The microscope and the moving target: the challenge of applying content analysis to the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77 (1), 80-98.

Motavelli, J. (1996). The Virtual Environment. E/The Environmental Magazine May/June. Retrieved February 15, 2006, from http://www.emagazine.com/may-june_1996/0597feat1.html.

Morville, P. & Rosenfeld, L. (2002). Information architecture for the World Wide Web: Designing large-scale Web Sites (2nd ed.). United States: O’Reilly.

Nielsen, J. (1998). Heuristic evaluation. Retrieved April, 2006, from www.useit.com/papers/heuristic.

Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.

Nielsen, J. (2002). Got usability? Talking with Jakob Nielsen. Retrieved September 1, 2009, from http:www.boxesandarrows.com/archives/got_usabilitu_talking_with_jakob_nielsen.php,18.

Nielsen, J. & Norman, D. (2000). Web-site usability: Usability on the web isn’t luxury. Information Week, 773. Retrieved April 29, 2006, from http://www.informationweek.com/773/web.htm.

Pohl, I. A. (2003). Advocacy on the web: An evaluation of a nonprofit advocacy organization’s use of the web to support its mission and goals. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Information and Library Science. Retrieved January 23, 2006, from http://ils.unc.edu/Mspapers/2846.pdf.

Pohl, I. A. (2004). Usability evaluation of an environmental website and its support of the organisation’s mission and goals. In Arno Scharl (Ed.), Environmental Online Communication (pp. 53- 62). London: Springer.

Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann, & S. Pingree. (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 110-134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Scharl, A. (2004). Environmental online communication. London: Springer.

Sehmel, H. A. (2001). Participatory decision-making, technology, and the environment. Paper presented at 48th Annual STC Conference.(Chicago, USA, May 13-16, 2001). Retrieved February 3, 2006 from http://www.stc.org/48thConf/postconf/HSehmel.rtf.

Sehmel, H.A. (2002). Websites and advocacy campaigns: Decision-making, implementation, and audience in an environmental advocacy group’s use of Web sites as part of it communication campaign. Business Communication Quarterly, 65(2).

Sehmel, H. A. (2004). How a small environmental group uses the web to inform and action. In Arno Scharl (Ed.), Environmental online communication (pp. 45-52). London: Springer.

Shneiderman, B. (2002). Leornado’s laptop: Human needs and the new computing technologies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Sinha, R., Hearst, M., & Ivory, M. (n.d). Content or graphics? An empirical analysis of criteria for award-winning websites. Retrieved November 1, 2007 from http://webtango.berkely.edu/papers/hwf01/hwf01.htm.

Slater, D. & Miller, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnographic approach. UK:Berg.

Spencer, T. (2002). The potential of the Internet for non-profit organizations. First Monday, 7(8). Retrieved September 6, 2005, from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue7-/spencer/index.html.

Taylor, M., Kent, M. L., & White, W. J. (2001). How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships. Retrieved January 17, 2006, from http:///www.montclair.edu/pages/commstudies/.../PRRTaylorKentWhiteActivism.pdf.

Vrontis, D., Ktoridou, D., and Melanthiou, Y. (2007). Website design development as an effective and efficient promotional tool: a case study in the hotel industry in Cyprus. Journal of Website Promotion,2 (3/4). Retrieved on 11.1.209 at http://jwp.haworthpress.com 207 by the Haworth Press.

Winn, W. & Beck, K. (2002). The persuasive power of design elements on an e-commerce Web sites. Technical Communication, 49(1), 17-35.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.