Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Do we need certified medical teachers in medical school at Universiti Sains Malaysia: An educator’s self-reflective questionnaire-based survey

Shahid Hassan, and Zafar Ahmed, and Ahmad Fuad Abdul Rahim, (2011) Do we need certified medical teachers in medical school at Universiti Sains Malaysia: An educator’s self-reflective questionnaire-based survey. Education in Medicine Journal, 3 (2). pp. 53-64. ISSN 2180-1932

[img]
Preview
PDF (Do we need certified medical teachers in medical school at Universiti Sains Malaysia: An educator’s self-reflective questionnaire-based survey) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
168Kb

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5959/eimj.3.2.2011.or6

Affiliations

Universiti Sains Malaysia. School of Medical Sciences
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Faculty of Medicine

Abstract

Background: Faculty’s role as educators is over looked in clinical education, even though the teaching has a direct reflection of performance of clinical competence and professional development of graduating doctors. Two major problems of clinical education are the lack of uniform teaching and learning strategies in postgraduate as well as later years of undergraduate clinical teaching and the professional development of faculty in teaching in medical institutions.

Objective: The survey has two major objectives. First objective was to know about the faculty response to a survey on teaching while trying to create awareness for teaching and research in teaching. The second objective was to know the faculty members’ understanding with principles of learning and teaching with strengths and weaknesses of respondents’ performance in clinical teaching on completing The Educator’s Self-Reflective Inventory (ESRI).

Method: The ESRI was administered to approach 214 faculty members in SMS at USM. Appraisal of self-reflection inventory as medical teacher and personal development with respect to challenges, opportunities, innovations and need assessment of teaching were explored in response to 35 items grouped in 5 clusters through a questionnaire-based survey utilizing ESRI.

Result: Statistical analysis of respondent’s data indicates a mixed response with lab-based disciplines 54.54% followed by surgical-based disciplines 50% and medical-based disciplines 30%. Individual discipline best response is received from Plastic Surgery and ORL-HNS (100%) and Hematology (77.77%). A result of individual item response in each cluster WAS also analyzed.

Conclusion: The survey evaluated the faculty’s response to ESRI and concern shown to develop their abilities as teachers and researchers in clinical teaching. However, the initial response suggested the need for more survey to continue creating the awareness for faculty development and research in teaching. Conclusion drawn from analysis of each items in inventory is encouraging for teaching in medical education.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Clinical teaching, research in teaching, educators, awareness, professional development
Subjects:R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:12225

1. Harden RM. Approaches to research in medical education. Med Educ 1986; 20:522-531.

2. Majumder MAA. Issues and priorities of medical education research in Asia. Annals Academy of Medicine 2004; 33 (2): 257-263.

3. Jason H. The importance and limits of evidence medical education. Educ Health 2000; 13:9-13.

4. Davis D, O’Brien TMA, Freemantle N, Wolf FM, Taylor-Vaisey A. Impact of formal continuing medical education: Do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behaviour or health care outcomes? JAMA, 1999; 282 (9): 867-874.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.9.867

5. Irby DM. Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: a thematic review of the literature. Acad Med 1995; 70 (10): 898-931

6.Metcalfe DH, Mathura M. Students’ perceptions of good and bad teaching: report of a critical incident study. Med Educ 1995; 29:193-197

7. Hassan S. Faculty development with research and innovation in medical teaching. Pakistan Journal of Otolaryngology, 2010; 26 (1): 1-2.

8. Hassan S. Exploring the ingredients of good teaching in postgraduate medical education. Pakistan Journal of Otolaryngology, 2008; 24 (3): 51-52.

9. Vrenon DTA, Blake RL. Does problem-based learning work? A meta - analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 1993; 68: 550-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199307000-00015

10. Kroboth FJ, Hanusa BH, Parker S, Coulehan JL, Kappor WN, Brown FH, et al. The inter-rater reliability and internal consistency of clinical evaluation exercise. J Gen Intern Med, 1992; 7: 174-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02598008

11. Norman G. Problem-solving skills versus problem-based learning, program for educational development. Perspective for Health Sciences Education in Pedagogue, 1989; Summer Ed: 1-2.

12. Hassan S. Professional development of clinical teachers as educators: role of medical education as discipline. Pakistan Journal of Otolaryngology 2011; 27:1-2

13. McKimm J. Professional developments for medical educators and clinical teachers: challenges and opportunities. South East Asian Journal of Medical Education, 2009; 3 (2): 3-8.

Repository Staff Only: item control page