Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Question vetting: theory and practice

Majed Mohammed Wadi, (2012) Question vetting: theory and practice. Education in Medicine Journal, 4 (1). e1-e4. ISSN 2180-1932

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
120Kb

Official URL: http://www.saifulbahri.com/esubmission/index.php/eimj/article/view/29/31

Affiliations

Universiti Sains Malaysia. School of Medical Sciences

Abstract

NA

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:vetting
Subjects:R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:12393

Corrigan O, Ellis K, Bleakley A, Brice J. Quality in m edical e ducation. In: Swanwick T, editor. Understanding Medical Education. 1st ed: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 379 - 291.

American Educational Research Association, AmericanPsychologicalAssociation, NationalCouncilonMeasurementinEducation. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.; 1999.

Verhoeven BH, Verwijnen GM, Scherpbier AJJA, Schuwirth LWT, Van Der Vleuten CPM. Quality Assurance in Test Construction: The Approach of a Multidisciplinary Central Test Committee. Education for Health: Change in Learning & Practice (Taylor & Francis Ltd). 1999;12(1):49.

Haladyna TM. Developing and validating multiple-choice test items. 3rd ed: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2004.

Baranowski RA. Item Editing and Editorial Review. In: Downing SM, Haladyna TM, editors. Handbook of Test Development. 1st ed. Mahwah, NJ US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2006. p. 349-57.

Downing SM. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Medical Education. 2003;37(9):830-7.

Downing SM, Haladyna TM. Validity and Its Threats. In: Downing SM, Yudkowsky R, editors. Assessment in Health Professions Education. 1st ed. New York: Routledge; 2009.

Downing S. Threats to the Validity of Locally Developed Multiple-Choice Tests in Medical Education: Construct-Irrelevant Variance and Construct Underrepresentation. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2002;7(3):235-41.

Downing SM, Haladyna TM. Validity threats: overcoming interference with proposed interpretations of assessment data. Medical Education. 2004;38(3):327-33.

Jozefowicz RFMD, Koeppen BMMDP, Case SP, Galbraith RMD, Swanson DP, Glew RHP. The Quality of In-house Medical School Examinations. Academic Medicine. 2002;77(2):156-61.

Wallach PM, Crespo LM, Holtzman KZ, Galbraith RM, Swanson DB. Use of a committee review process to improve the quality of course examinations. Advances In Health Sciences Education: Theory And Practice. 2006;11(1):61-8.

Hubbard JP. Measuring Medical Education. 1st ed: Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1971.

Anderson J. The Multiple Choice Question in Medicine 2nd ed. London: PITMAN BOOKS LIMITED; 1982.

Case S, Swanson D. Constructing Written Test Questions for Basic and Clinical Sciences. 3 ed. Philadelphia National Board of Medical Examiners; 1998.

Osterlind SJ. Constructing Test Items: Multiple-Choice, Constructed Response, Performance and Other Formats. 2 ed. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.

Haladyna TM, Downing SM, Rodriguez MC. A Review of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Guidelines for Classroom Assessment. Applied Measurement in Education. 2002;15(3):309 - 33.

Tarrant M, Ware J. A framework for improving the quality of multiple-choice assessments. Nurse Educator. 2012, In Press;37(3).

Downing SM. Written Tests: Constructed-Response and Selected-Response Formats. In: Downing SM, Yudkowsky R, editors. Assessment in Health Professions Education. New York: Routledge; 2009.

Downing SM. The Effects of Violating Standard Item Writing Principles on Tests and Students: The Consequences of Using Flawed Test Items on Achievement Examinations in Medical Education. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2005;10(2):133-43.

Tarrant M, Ware J. Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments. Medical Education. 2008;42(2):198-206.

Wadi M, Yusoff MSB, Rahim AFA. The 31 Revised Taxonomy of Multiple-Choice Item Writing Guidelines: Can it be used as a Vetting Protocol?. Paper presented at the 15th Ottawa Conference, Kuala Lumpur.2012.

Cizek GJ. The effect of altering the position of options in a multiple-choice examination. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1994;54(1):8-20.

O'Neill KA. The Effect of Stylistic Changes on Item Performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.1986.

Webb L, Heck W. The effect of stylistic editing on item performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago1991.

Buckwalter JA, Schumacher R, Albright JP, Cooper RR. Use of an educational taxonomy for evaluation of cognitive performance. Academic Medicine. 1981;56(2):115-21.

Ferland JJ, Dorval J, Levasseur L. Measuring higher cognitive levels by multiple choice questions: a myth? Medical Education. 1987;21(2):109-13.

Peitzman SJ, Nieman LZ, Gracely EJ. Comparison of "fact-recall" with "higher-order" questions in multiple-choice examinations as predictors of clinical performance of medical students. Academic Medicine. 1990;65(9):S59-60.

Tarrant M, Knierim A, Hayes SK, Ware J. The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments. Nurse Education Today. 2006;26(8):662-71.

Ebel RL, Frisbie DA. Essentials of Educational Measurement. 5th ed: Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; 1991.

Lange A, Lehmann IJ, Mehrens WA. USING ITEM ANALYSIS TO IMPROVE TESTS. Journal of Educational Measurement. 1967;4(2):65-8.

Downing SM. Construct-irrelevant Variance and Flawed Test Questions: Do Multiple-choice Item-writing Principles Make Any Difference? Academic Medicine. 2002;77(10)(Supplement):S103-S4.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.