Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Gauging the Use of and Satisfaction with Home Grown Electronic Journals: A Malaysian Case Study

Huzaimah Abdul Rani, and Zainab A.N., (2006) Gauging the Use of and Satisfaction with Home Grown Electronic Journals: A Malaysian Case Study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 11 (2). pp. 105-120. ISSN 1394-6234

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://ejum.fsktm.um.edu.my/ArticleInformation.aspx?ArticleID=390

Affiliations

University Malaysia Sarawak Library
University of Malaya, Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, MLIS Programme

Abstract

This study examines the users of electronic journals published in a hosting system called EJUM (Electronic Journal of the University of Malaya) and their perceived satisfaction with the electronic journals as well as their preferred features in electronic journals and problems they face when using the electronic journals. The Malaysian Journal of Computer Science (MJCS), Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science (MJLIS) and Journal of Problem Based Learning (JPBL) are being hosted by EJUM. These three electronic journals constitute 3 out of an estimated 17 electronic journals published in Malaysia. Users seem to use the electronic journals to mainly support research and teaching needs. About 50% of respondents rated the journals as “good”, 20.6% rated “fair”. Respondents seem to find out about the journals mainly serendipitously as they were browsing the Internet or “found out from a conference paper” or “saw information about it in an article”. Keywords (28.9%) and title (24.3%) searches were chosen by a third of respondents respectively. The majority of respondents (70%) indicated preferring retrieving articles in PDF or HTML. About 41.8% of respondents access the electronic journals while making searches on Google or Yahoo. The next most selected option was “from specific journal hosting system” (21.8%), followed by “from my library web portal” and “from citation links found in another resource”. Most respondents scan the abstracts first to check relevance and then download the articles. Most respondents believed that electronic journals will co-exist with print journals (46.2%). The rest believed that electronic journals will replace the print journals (25.5%) or will supplement (25.5%). The list of functions and features preferred by electronic journal is provided.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Electronic journals; Electronic publishing; User studies; Journal use study; EJUM; Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science; Malaysian Journal of Computer Science
Subjects:Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Science
ID Code:144

Akasawa, M and Ueda, S. 1998. On the use of electronic media by academic economists. Library and Information Sciences, Vol. 40: 1-27

Ashcroft, L and McIvor, S. 2001. Electronic journals: managing and educating for a changing culture in academic libraries. Online Information Review. Vol. 25, no. 6: 378-387.

Bancroft, A.F. et al. 1998. A forward looking library use survey: WSU libraries in the 21st century. Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol.24: 216-224.

Bar-Ilan, J. et al. 2003. A survey on the use of electronic databases and electronic journals accessed through the web by the academic staff of Israeli Universities. Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol.29, no.6: 346-361

Bauer, Kathleen and Bakkalbasi, Nia. 2005. An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9) September: 8p.

Brennan, M.J.; Hurd, J.M.; Blecic, D.D. and Weller, Ann C. 2002. A snapshot of early adopters of e-journals: challenges to the library. College & Research Libraries, Vol. 63, no.6: 5150526

Dillon, I.F. and Hahn, K.L. 2002. Are the researchers ready for the electronic only collection? Results of a survey at the University of Maryland. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2: 375-390.

E-Just. 2000. E-journal user study. Available at: http://ejust.stanford.edu

E-Just. 2001. First survey highlights. Available at: http//ejust.stanford.edu/findings /SurveyHighlights.html

E-Just. 2002. Second survey findings. Available at http//ejust.stanford.edu/findings 2.2SurveyHighlights.html

Monopoli, M.D.; Nicholas, P.Georgiou and Korfitai, M. 2002. A user-oriented evaluation of digital libraries: a case study of ‘electronic journals’ service of the library and information service of the University of Patras,

Greece. ASLIB Proceedings, 54: 103-117

Rogers, S.A. 2001. Electronic Journal usage at Ohio State University. College & Research Libraries, Vol.62: 25-34

Rusch-Feja, D and Siebeky, U. 1999. Evaluation of usage and acceptance of electronic journals, D-Lib Magazine, October 1999. Available at: http:www.dlib.org/dlib/october99/rusch-feja/10rusch-feja-full-report.html

Savori, A and Jeffrey, L. 2002. E-journal user study results and preliminary analysis: e-journal expert workshop. Stanford: Institute for the Future. Available at: http://ejust.stanford.edu/hiwire_0502.pdf#search=%22journal% 20usage%20study%20%22

Tenner, E. and Yang, Z.Y. 1999. End user acceptance of electronic journals: a case study from major academic research library. Technical Services Quarterly, Vol.17:1-14.

Tommey, H. and Burton, P.F. 1998. Electronic journals: a study of usage and attitudes among academics. Journal of Information Science, Vol. 24: 419-429

Weingart, S.J. and Anderson, J.A. 2000. When questions are answers: using a survey to achieve faculty awareness of the library’s electronic resources. College & Research Libraries, Vol. 61: 127-134.

Zainab A.N. ; Ang Tan Fong and Abrizah Abdullah. 2005. E-journal publishing in Malaysia: from single journal system to publishing through a host. Information Development, Vol.21: 53-65.

Repository Staff Only: item control page