Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » By Affiliations
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top 20 Journal Cited
 » Top 20 Cited
 » Top 20 Author Cited
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Shear Bond Strength Of Orthodontic Adhesives On Different Tooth Types: An In Vitro Study

Radzi Z. (Zamri Radzi), and Yahya N.A. (Noor Azlin Yahya), and Abu Kasim N.H. (Noor Hayaty Abu Kasim), and Ismail N.H., and Ismail N.A., and Zamzam N., (2006) Shear Bond Strength Of Orthodontic Adhesives On Different Tooth Types: An In Vitro Study. Annals of Dentistry, Vol.13 (No.1). pp. 18-23. ISSN 0128-7532

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
216Kb

Official URL: http://ejum.fsktm.um.edu.my/ArticleInformation.aspx?ArticleID=381

Affiliations

University of Malaya, Faculty of Dentistry. Dept. of Children's Dentistry & Orthodontics
University of Malaya. Faculty of Dentistry. Dept. of Conservative Dentistry
University of Malaya. Faculty of Dentistry. Dept. of Conservative Dentistry
University of Malaya. Faculty of Dentistry
University of Malaya. Faculty of Economics & Administration. Dept. of Applied Statistics
University of Malaya, Faculty of Dentistry. Dept. of Children's Dentistry & Orthodontics

Abstract

Introduction: Owing to the variety of materials and methods employed, comparison of the results and findings from bonding studies is difficult. Until recently, several types of teeth have been used in published research papers as a substrate in orthodontic bonding research including bovine incisors, fresh and rebonded human premolars. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of an adhesive bonded to different tooth surfaces (human premolar, bovine incisor and rebonded human premolar). Methods: Two groups of thirty premolar teeth and one group of bovine incisors had brackets attached in a standardized manner using Transbond XT (3M Unitek). The adhesive was cured using conventional halogen light and a specially designed tool to standardize the distance between the light curing tip and the adhesive. The debonding force was measured using Instron universal testing machine. ANOVA and Post Hoc Dunnett C test were performed to determine any significant difference among groups (p<0.05). Results: The results of Post Hoc Dunnett C test indicated no statistical differences between the human premolar group and rebonded group. However, the differences existed in bond strength between bovine group versus human premolar group and bovine group versus human rebonded premolar group. Bovine group had the highest bond strength with mean values of 8.5 (S.D ± 4.2) MPa. Human premolar and rebonded groups had mean bond strengths of 6.1(S.D ± 4.5) and 4.9 (S.D ± 2.7)MPa, respectively. Conclusions: This study revealed that bovine teeth produced higher bond strength compared to both fresh and rebonded human premolar. Therefore, findings in any bond strength studies using bovine teeth should be interpreted with caution.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Orthodontic adhesives,bond strength,human premolar,bovine tooth
Subjects:R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:145

1. Buonocore, M.G. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. Journal of Dental Research, 1955; 34: 849-53.

2. Swift E.J. Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann H.O. Bonding to enamel and dentin: A brief history and state of the art. Quintessence International 1995; 26: 95-110.

3. Newman, G.V. Epoxy adhesive for orthodontic attachments. Progress report. American Journal of Orthodontics 1965; 56: 901-12.

4. Thanos, C.E., Munholland, T., Caputo, A.A. Adhesion of meshbase direct bonding brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics 1979; 75:421-30.

5. Gorelick, L. Bonding metal brackets with a selfpolymerizing sealant-composite: A 12- month assessment. American Journal of Orthodontics 1977;71:542-53.

6. Eliades, G.C., Brantley, W.A. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. European Journal of Orthodontics 2000; 22: 13-23

7. Fox, N.A., McCabe, J.F., Buckley, J.G. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. British Journal of Orthodontics 1994; 21: 33-43.

8. Kelsey, W.P., Shearer, G.O., Cavel, W.T., Blankenau, R.J. (1987). The effects of wand positioning on the polymerization of composite resin. J Am Dent Assoc 114: 213-5.

9. Pires, J..A.F., Cvitko, E., Denehy, G.E., Swift, E.J. (1993) Effects of curing tip distance on light intensity and composite resin microhardness. Quintessence Int; 24: 517-21.

10. ADEPT Report . Direct composite restoratives, Report 1991; 2: 53-64.

11. Littlewood S.J, Redhead A. Use of jigs to standardize orthodontic bond testing. Journal of Dentistry 1998; 26: 539-45.

12. Weatherell, J.A., Robinson, C., Hallsworth, A.S. Changes in the fluoride concentration of the labial enamel surface with age. Caries Research 1972; 6: 312-24.

13. Rueggeberg, F.A. Substrate for adhesion testing to tooth structure-review of literature. Dental Materials 1991; 7: 2-10.

14. Oesterle L.J, Shellhart W.C, Belanger G.K The use od bovine enamel in bonding studies. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1998; 113: 514-9.

15. Hobson R.S, Rugg-Gunn A.J, Booth T.A. Acidetch patterns on the buccal surface of human permanent teeth. Achieves of oral Biology 2002; 47: 407-12.

16. Mattick, C.R., Hobson, R.S. A comparative micro-topographic study of the buccal enamel of different tooth types. Journal of Orthodontics 2000; 27: 143-8.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
   
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.