Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author


   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


Login | Create Account

Publication Productivity of Malaysian Authors and Institutions in LIS

Norhazwani Yazit, and Zainab A.N., (2007) Publication Productivity of Malaysian Authors and Institutions in LIS. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 12 (2). pp. 35-55. ISSN 1394-6234

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL:


University of Malaya. Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology. MLIS Programme


The paper attempted to provide a “picture” of Malaysian LIS research and publications. The study aimed to show (a) the total number and spread of publications produced by Malaysian authors; (b) the active authors; (c) the authorship pattern; (d) the affiliation status of the authors; (e) the main channels used to publish; and (f) the subject covered by the published works. The study confined its scope to the publications produced between 1965 and 2005 by Malaysian authors published in Malaysia as well as abroad. Bibliometric techniques and regression analysis were employed as the measuring instrument. The data was collected from seven online databases and seven well established library OPACs, which are expected to hold earlier and current LIS publications. A bibliometric toolbox was used to feed in text files which provided brief summaries of ranked results, a bibliograph and minimal Bradford zonal analysis. The subject categorization used by Gorman and Corbit’s Model of core competencies for LIS was used to categorized entries by subjects. The results indicated that (a) Malaysian LIS authors preferred to publish in journals (511, 48.9%) and conference papers (474, 45.4%); (b) the publication distribution fluctuated over the 41 year period but the moving average depicted a steady incremental trend; (c) a total of 506 authors contributed to 1,045 publications and 309 are one-time authors’ (d) the active authors in LIS are affiliated to 131 institutions and the productive institutions were the national Library of Malaysia, University of Malaya library and the academics at the MLIS Programme, University of Malaya.; (e) publication productivity was related to institutional active involvement in LIS journal publishing; and (f) the main subject areas actively researched upon were collection development and management, information centres and services, and ICT applications LIS.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Published works; scholarly communication; Authorship pattern; Bibliometrics; Malaysia
Subjects:Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Science
ID Code:1605

Adamson, Martha C. and Zamora, Gloria J. 1981. Publishing in library science journals,College & Research Libraries, Vol. 42: 235-241.

Agboola, A.T. and Oduwole, A.A. 2005. Staff seminars and publication productivity: a study of academic librarians in Ogun State, Nigeria. Library Management, Vol. 26,no. 8/9: 478-486.

Adkins, Denise and Budd, John. 2006. Scholarly productivity of US LIS faculty. Library and Information Science Research, Vol.28, no. 3, 2006: 374-389.

Aina, L.O. and Mooko, N.P. 1999. Research and publication patterns in library and information science, Information Development, Vol.15, no.2: 114-119.

Atinmo, Morayo I. and Jimba, Samuel W. 2002. Gender and authorship patterns in an African Librarianship journal, 1991-01997. Library Review, Vol. 51, no. 9: 458-463.

Bradigan, Pamela S. and Mularski, Carol A. 1996. Evaluation of academic librarians’publications for tenure and initial promotion. Journal of Academic Librarianship,Vol. 22: 360-365.

Budd, John M. 1999. Increases in faculty publishing activity: an analysis of ARL and ACRL institutions. College & Research Libraries, Vol. 6, no.4: 3-8-315.

Budd, John M. 2000. Scholarly productivity of US LIS aculty: an update. Library Quarterly, Vol. 70, no. 2: 230-245.

Budd, John M. and Seavey, Charles A. 1990. Characteristics of journal authorship by academic librarians. College & Research Libraries, Vol.51: 466.

Budd, John M. and Seavey, Charles A. 1996. Productivity of US Library and information science faculty: the Hayes study revisited. Library Quarterly, Vol. 66,no. 1: 1-20.

Edem, U.S. and Lawal, Olu Olat. 1999. Job satisfaction and publication output among librarians in Nigerian universities. Library Management, Vol. 20, no. 1: 39-46.

Edzan, N.N. and Abrizah Abdullah. 2003. Looking back: the Master of Library and Information Science programme at the University of Malaya. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol.8, no.1: 1-18.

Fenske, Ruth E. and Dalrymple, Prudence W. 1992. Factors influencing research productivity among health sciences librarians. Bulletin of Medical L:ibrary Association, Vol.80, no. 4.

Gu, Yinian and Zainab A.N. 2001. Publication productivity of Malaysian researchers in the field of Computer Science and Information Technology. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol. 6, no.1: 1-23.

Hart, Richard L. 1999. Scholarly publication by university librarians: a study at Penn State. College & Research Libraries, Vol.60, no.5: 454-462.

Hart, Richard L. 2000a. Co-authorship in the academic library literature: a survey of attitudes and behaviors, Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol.26, no. 5: 339-345.

Hart, Richard L. 2000b. Collaborative publication by university librarians: an exploratory study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 26: 94-99.

Hayes, Robert M. 1983. Citation statistics as a measure of faculty research productivity. Journal of Education for Librarianship, Vol.23: 151-172.

Henry, Deborah B. and Neville, Tina M. 2004. Research, publication and service patterns of Florida academic librarians. Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol.30, no. 6: 435-451.

Horri, Abbas. 2004. Bibliometric overview of library and information science research productivity in Iran. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. Vol.45, no. 1: 15-26.

Joswick, Kathleen E. 1999. Article publication patterns of academic librarians: an Illinois case study. College & Research Libraries, Vol.60, no. 4: 340-349.

Kademani, et al., 2005. Nobel laureates: their publication productivity, collaboration and authorship status. Scientometrics, Vol. 62, no.2: 261-268.

Liu, N.C. and Cheng, Y. 2005. Academic ranking of world universities – methodologies and problems. Higher Education in Europe, Vol.30, no.2.

Liu, Jinjing. 2003. A bibliometric study: author productivity and co-authorship features of JASIST 2001-2002. Mississippi Libraries, Vol. 67, no.4: 110-122.

Lotka, A.J. 1926. Statistics- the frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, Vol.16: 317-325.

Mabowonku, Iyabo. 2001. Trends in library and information science research in Africa, 1991-2000. African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science, Vol.11,no.2: 79-88.

Meho, Lokman I. and Spurgin, Kristina M. 2005. Ranking the research productivity of LIS faculty and schools: an evaluation of data sources and research methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol.56,no.12: 1314-1331.

Moracsik, M.J. 1985. Applied scientometrics: an assessment methodology for developing countries. Scientometrics, Vol.7, no.3: 165-176.

Muffo, John A.; Mead, Susan B. and Bayer, Alan E. 1987. Using faculty publication rates for comparing “peer” institutions. Research in Higher Education. Vol.27,no.2.

Narin, F. and Hamilton, Kimberley. 1996. Bibliometric performance measures, Scientometrics. Vol;. 36, no. 3: 293-310.

Nwakanma, Chukwuemeka Dean. 2003. Research publications in library and information Science (LIS) in Nigeria: publishing to the wrong audience. African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science, Vol.13,no.2:93-106.

Oyeniyi, J. Oluwakemi and Bozimo, D.O. 2004. The relationship between author collaboration and productivity: a study of sorghum literature in Nigeria. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, Vol.14, no.1: 29-36.

Tiew, W.S.; Abrizah, Abdullah and Kiran Kaur. 2002. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science. 1996-2000: a bibliometric study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol.6, no.2: 43-56.

Toutkoushian, et al. 2003. Using publications count to measure an institution’s research productivity. Research in Higher Education, Vol. 44, no. 2.

Tsay, Ming Yueh. 2004. Literature growth, journal characteristics and author productivity in subject indexing, 1977 to 2000. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol.55. no.1: 64-73.

Uzun, Ali. 2002. Productivity ratings of institutions based on publication in Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics, 1981-2000. Scientometrics, Vol.53,no. 3: 297-307.

Waworuntu, Bob and Holsinger, Donald B. 1989. The research productivity of Indonesian professors of higher education. Higher Education, Vol.18: 167-187.

Winston, Mark and Williams, James F. 2003. Collaboration between practitioners and teaching faculty: a study of research, publication, and citation patterns. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, Vol.44, no.3/4: 221-234.

Yeoh, Hai Loon. 2005. An analysis of research publications in library and information science in Malaysia. Dissertation (MLIS) – Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya.

Yontar, Aysel and Yalvac Mesut. 2000. Problems of library and information science research in Turkey: a content analysis of journal articles, 1952-1994. IFLA Journal, Vol.26, no/1: 39-51.

Zemon, Mickey and Bahr, Alice Harrison. 1998. An analysis of articles by college librarians. College & Research Libraries, Vol. 59, no. 5: 422-432.

Repository Staff Only: item control page