Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

A M-E (Mobile-Elearning) Adaptive Architecture to Support Flexible Learning

Issack, Santally Mohammad, and Hosany, Mussawir, and Gianeshwar, Ramsawok, (2006) A M-E (Mobile-Elearning) Adaptive Architecture to Support Flexible Learning. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology (MOJIT), 3 (1). pp. 19-28. ISSN 1823-1144

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://pppjj.usm.my/mojit/articles/pdf/0406/03-0306-Santally-Mauritius-final.pdf

Affiliations

University of Mauritius. Virtual Center for Innovative Learning Technologies
University of Mauritius. Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
University of Mauritius. Dept.of Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Abstract

This paper describes the M-E adaptive architecture designed to blend mobile and e-learning in a single integrated computer-based infrastructure. A prototype application has been developed that consists of three main components namely the web-based interface, the mobile access interface, and the adaptation mechanism that is used to provide just-in-time tailored content according to students’ individual preferences. The prototype application is currently restricted to the design of multiple-choice questions that can be answered by students either using a web-interface or by downloading on their mobile phones. Their progress is then synchronised with the main web database for pedagogical followup by their respective teachers. The blending of the pedagogical approach to support mobile learners adds more flexibility to the learning process. However, it is clear that m-learning would not be suitable for reading large files but rather it should be used to support carefully chosen and well-fitted pedagogical scenarios that will potentially improve the teaching and learning process.

Item Type:Journal
Additional Information:We acknowledge the excellent work carried out by our three students (Kurmally, Jhumka and Sullimun Jeajee) in the implementation of the prototype applications as part of their final year project. We thank all support staff from the Faculty of Engineering and VCILT for their technical assistance to the students.
Subjects:Q Science
T Technology
L Education
ID Code:1633

Buch, K. & Bartley, S. (2002). Learning style and training delivery mode preference. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14(1), 5-10.

Cronbach, L. & Snow, R. (1977). Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions. New York: Irvington.

Davis, G.A. (1983). Educational Psychology. New York: Allyn Bacon.

Dunn, R.. (1996). How to implement and supervise a learning style program. USA: ACSD.

Dunn, R., Griggs, S.A., Olson, J., Gorman, B. & Beasley, M. (1995). A meta analytic validation of the Dunn and Dunn learning styles model. Journal of Educational Research, 88(6),353-361.

Jonassen, D.H. & Grabowski, B. (1993). Individual Differences and Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ.

Kinshuk & Lin T. (2004). Application of learning styles adaptivity in mobile learning environments. Third Pan Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning, 4-8 July 2004, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Masood, M. (2004). A ten-year analysis: trends in traditional educational technology literature. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, Vol 1(2). [Online]

http://pppjj.usm.my/mojit/articles/V1N2-final/MOJIT-Mona.htm

Mcloughlin, C., (1999). The implications of research literature on learning styles for the design of instructional material. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 222-241. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet15/mcloughlin.htm

Multisilta, J., Henno, J., Lipiäinen, J. & Hämäläinen, M. (2001). Is the Future of eLearning in Mobile Devices?. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2001(1), 1372-1375. [Online]. Available: http://dl.aace.org/8746.

Patel A. & Kinshuk. (1997). Intelligent tutoring tools in a computer integrated learning environment for introductory numeric disciplines. Innovations in Education and Training International Journal, 34(3), 200-207.

Peck, M.L. (1983). Aptitude treatment interaction research has educational value. Proceedings of selected research paper presentations at the 1983 convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology and sponsored by the Research and Theory Division. (pp. 564-622).New Orleans: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

Santally, M. (2003). Individual instruction and distance learning: Application of learning and cognitive styles. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 5(2), 15-26.

Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning, Computers and Education, 34, 177-193.

Shepherd, C. (2001). M is for maybe. Retrieved August 23, 2004, from http://www.fastrak-consulting.co.uk/tactix/features/mlearning.htm

Son, C., Lee, Y. & Park, S. (2004). Toward new definition of M-learning. Health., & Higher Ed. 2004(1), 2137-2140. [Online]. http://dl.aace.org/16745.

Trifonova, A., Knapp, J., Ronchetti, M. & Gamper, J. (2004). Mobile ELDIT: Transition from an e-learning to an m-learning system. Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2004(1), 188-193. [Online]. http://dl.aace.org/15398.

Yuen, S. & Wang, S. (2004). M-learning: Mobility in learning. Health & Higher Ed, 2004(1), 2248-2252. [Online]. http://dl.aace.org/16763.

Repository Staff Only: item control page