Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Relationships between Sources and Dimensions of Computer Anxiety

Samsilah Roslan, and Tan Chee Mun, (2005) Relationships between Sources and Dimensions of Computer Anxiety. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology (MOJIT), 2 (2). pp. 41-49. ISSN 1823-1144

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://pppjj.usm.my/mojit/articles/pdf/August05/04-Article-039-Samsilah-UPM.pdf

Affiliations

Universiti Putra Malaysia. Faculty of Educational Studies
Universiti Putra Malaysia. Faculty of Educational Studies

Abstract

This study investigates computer anxiety among teachers graduate students in the Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Malaysia. Relationships between computer anxiety level and sources of computer anxiety are analysed to better understand the phenomenon. The modified Computer Anxiety Scale (COMPAS) originally developed by Oetting (1983) was used to measure computer anxiety level. Sources of computer anxiety were measured using 13 items developed by Graham & Glenn (1995). Most of the respondents are generally relaxed and confident with computers. Investigation into the sources of anxiety reveals that damage anxiety is the highest source of anxiety. Significant positive relationships are also found between sources of anxiety and anxiety level with task anxiety showing the strongest relationship with anxiety level (r =0.57 , p<0.05).

Item Type:Journal
Subjects:Q Science
T Technology
L Education
ID Code:1657

Appelbaum, S.H. (1990). Computerphobia: Training managers to reduce the fears and love the machines. Industrial & Commercial Training, 22(6), 9 –16.

Brosnan, M.J. (1998). The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, pp. 223 – 234.

Cambre, M.A. & Cook, D. (1985). Computer anxiety: definition, measurement and correlates. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1(1), 37 – 54.

Dorinina O.V. (1995). Fear of computers. Russian Social Science Review, 36 (4), 79 – 105.

Graham, B. & Glenn, R. (1995). A report on cyberphobia as a factor in teacher stress in queensland teachers, and implications for professional development. Cyberphobia, pp. 2 –105??.

Graham, B. & Glenn, R. (1997). Computer experience, school support and computer anxieties. Educational Psychology, 17(3), 267 – 284.

Hakkinen, P. (1994). Changes in computer anxiety in a required computer course. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27 (2), 141 – 153.

Harrington, K.V., McElory, J.C. & Morrow, P.C. (1990). Computer anxiety and computer based training: a laboratory. Educational Computing Research, 6, 343 – 358.

Henry, J.W. (1994). Resistance to computer-based technology in the workplace: Causes and solutions. Executive Development, 7(1), 20 – 23.

Kian, S.H. & Chee, K.K. (2002). Computer anxiety and attitudes toward computers among rural secondary school teachers: A Malaysian perspective. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35 (1), 27 – 48.

Marcoulides, G.A. (1989). Measuring computer anxiety: the computer anxiety scale. Educational Psychological Measurement, 49, 733 – 740.

Martin, B.L., Stewart, D.L. & Hillison, J. (2001). Computer anxiety levels of Virginia extension personnel. Journal of Extension, 39 (1)http://www.joe.org/joe/2001february/a1.html.

Oetting, E.R. (1983). Manual: Oetting’s Computer Anxiety Scale (COMPAS). Ft. Collins: Tri-Ethic Center for Prevention Research, Colorado State University.

Repository Staff Only: item control page