Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » By Affiliations
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top 20 Journal Cited
 » Top 20 Cited
 » Top 20 Author Cited
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Comparison of BACTEC MGIT 960 system and BACTEC 460 TB system for growth and detection of Mycobacteria from clinical specimens

Ganeswrie R., and Chui C.S., and Balan S., and Puthucheary S.D., (2004) Comparison of BACTEC MGIT 960 system and BACTEC 460 TB system for growth and detection of Mycobacteria from clinical specimens. Malaysian Journal of Pathology, 26 (2). pp. 99-103. ISSN 0126-8635

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
55Kb

Official URL: http://www.mjpath.org.my/past_issue/MJP2004.2/03%20Bactec.pdf

Affiliations

Hospital Sultanah Aminah, Johor Bahru
Hospital Sultanah Aminah, Johor Bahru
Hospital Sultanah Aminah, Johor Bahru
University of Malaya, Faculty of Medicine. Dept. of Medical Microbiology

Abstract

This study was carried out to compare the performance of BACTEC MGIT 960 with the BACTEC 460 TB for growth and detection of Mycobacteria from human clinical specimens. The BACTEC MGIT 960 instrument is a fully automated system that utilizes MGIT tubes containing an oxygen sensor embedded in silicon at the bottom and filled with 7 mL of modified Middlebrook 7H9 broth. Identical samples were inoculated into the two automated systems and incubated for six weeks. Over a period of three months, 279 specimens were decontaminated and processed according to the standard CDC NALC/NaOH method, using the commercial MycoPrep kit. Forty-two specimens (15%) yielded Mycobacterium tuberculosis; 37 (88%) were detected by the fluorescent BACTEC MGIT 960 and 35 (83%) detected by the radiometric BACTEC 460 TB. Fifteen specimens (5%) yielded Mycobacterium Other Than Tuberculosis (MOTT); 10 (66%) were detected by BACTEC MGIT 960 and 11 (73%) detected by BACTEC 460 TB. The average time to detection and contamination rates and the average time to obtain results of antimicrobial susceptibility tests between the two systems were compared. The performance of the BACTEC MGIT 960 was comparable to the BACTEC 460 TB system which has been the “Gold Standard” for automated detection of TB. The former was more rapid, as sensitive and less labour intensive than the BACTEC
460. Our data demonstrates that the BACTEC MGIT 960 system is an accurate, automated and a non-radioactive alternative to the BACTEC 460 TB for the culture and susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Tuberculosis, BACTEC, rapid detection.
Subjects:R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:1841

1. Kanchana MV, Cheke D, Natyshak I., Connor B, Warner A, Martin T. Evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system for the recovery of Mycobacteria. Diagnostic Microbiol Infect Dis 2000; 37: 31-6.

2. Kochi A Tuberculosis: a global emergency. World Forum. 1993; 14: 438.

3. Anargyros P, Astill DS, Lim IS. Comparison of improved BACTEC and Lowenstein – Jensen media for culture of Mycobacteria from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28: 1288-91.

4. Kirihara JM, Hillier SL, Coyle MB. Improved detection times for Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium tuberculosis with the BACTEC radiometric system. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 22:841-5.

5. Tortoli E, Cichero P, Piersimoni C, Simonetti T, Gesu G, Nista D. Use of BACTEC MGIT 960 for recovery of Mycobacteria from Clinical Specimens: Multicentre Study. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37: 3578-82

6. Somoskovi A, Kodmon C, Lentos A, Bartfai Z, Tamasi L, Fuzy J, Magyar P. Comparison of recoveries of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using the Automated BACTEC MGIT 960 System, the

BACTEC 460 TB System, and Lowenstein-Jensen medium. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 2395-97.

7. Hanna BA, Ebrahimzadeh A, Elliot LB, Morgan MA, Novak SM, Rushch-Gerdes et al. Multicentre evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 System for the recovery of Mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37: 748-51.

8. Salfinger M, Pfyffer GE. The new diagnostic mycobacteriology laboratory. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1994; 13: 961-79.

9. Wolinsky E. Conventional diagnostic methods for tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 1994;19: 396-401.

10. Kent PT, Kubica GP. Public health mycobacteriology: a guide for the level 3 laboratory. Department of Health and Human Services. 1985. Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, USA.

11. Strum AW, Roux L. Evaluation of the BACTEC TABLE 3: Contamination rates (%) for the individual system Culture System Aug Sep Oct 3 month average ACTEC MGIT 960 12.6 5.8 5.1 7.8. ACTEC 460 TB 5.8 4.1 7.8 5.9

12. Saleh AF, Weyer B, Brons U. Comparison of the BACTEC MGIT 960 System with the BACTEC 460 System and the solid media for the detection of Mycobacteria from the clinical specimens in a clinical laboratory. 9th European Congress of

Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Berlin, 1999.

13. Cernoch PL, Enns RK, Saubolle MA, Wallace RJ. Cumitech 16A, Laboratory Diagnosis of the Mycobacterioses. Weissfeld AS. (editor). American Society for Microbiology, Washington D.C. 1994.

14. Harris J.M, Brink T, Bustos S, Copertino DW, Franklin G, Kelly K, Llorin O, Yanson K.Development of a Homogenous DNA Amplification Test for the real-time, Direct Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA on the BDProbeTec ET Instrument. 99th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology. May 1999.

15. Rohner P, Ninet B, Metral C, Emler S, Auckenthaler R. Evaluation of the MB/Bact System and the comparison to the BACTEC 460 System and Solid Media for the Isolation of Mycobacteria from clinical Specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35: 3127-31.

Repository Staff Only: item control page