Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » By Affiliations
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top 20 Journal Cited
 » Top 20 Cited
 » Top 20 Author Cited
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Margin Width, Internal Line Angle And Labial Emergence Profiles Of Maxillary Metalloceramic

Yahya N.A. (Noor Azlin Yahya), and Youngson, C.C., (2007) Margin Width, Internal Line Angle And Labial Emergence Profiles Of Maxillary Metalloceramic. Annals of Dentistry, 14 (1). 7p.. ISSN 0128-7532

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://ejum.fsktm.um.edu.my/ArticleInformation.aspx?ArticleID=526

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Medicine. Dept. of Conservative Dentistry
University of Liverpool. School of Dentistry. Dept. of Clinical Dental Sciences

Abstract

The purpose of this study were to compare the emergence profiles of crowns with their contralateral tooth, in vitro, and to determine if there is any association between the design of tooth preparations and the resultant emergence profile. 50 working models used for single crown construction were examined. Measurements of the faciolingual width of the crowns and contralateral teeth were taken using digital calipers. Internal line angles and the margin width of dies and the emergence profile of the corresponding crowns were measured from longitudinally sectioned polyvinylsiloxane indices mounted on a flat-bed scanner using image analysis software. Using Students t tests, no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) were found for shoulder width (mean 0.94 ± 0.23mm), internal line angle (mean 105.83 ± 13.57°) or emergence profiles (28.56 ± 12.95°) in the different (anterior, premolar or molar) preparations or crowns. The mean emergence profiles for all crowns was statistically significantly greater (p<0.001) than the contralateral tooth (mean 15.33 ± 7.77°). Using linear regression, there was a weak statistical relationship between emergence profile and margin width (Emergence profile° = 31.352 – 2.973 x margin width (mm)). There was no statistical association between the internal line angle and the resultant emergence profile. In conclusion, the emergence profiles of crowns were higher than the contralateral teeth. Maxillary metalloceramic crown preparations had shoulder widths that did not conform to recommendations in standard texts but line angles were within a satisfactory range. The margin width exerts a weak effect upon the emergence profile of the crown.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Emergence profile; crown preparation; shoulder width
Subjects:R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:1986

1. Black GV. Operative Dentistry, vol.2. Chicago, Medico-Dental Publishing Co. 1908.

2. Loe H. Reactions of marginal periodontal tissues to restorative procedures. Int Dent J 1968; 18: 759-78.

3. Ramfjord SP. Periodontal aspects of restorative dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 1974; 1: 107-26.

4. Yap UJ, Ong G. Periodontal considerations in restorative dentistry. Part 2: Prosthodontic considerations. Dent Update 1995; 23: 13-6.

5. Becker CM, Kaldahl WB. Current theories of crown contour, margin placement, and pontic design. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 107-15.

6. Flores-de-Jacoby L, Zafiropoulos G-G, Ciancio S. The effect of crown margin location on plaque and periodontal health. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1989; 3: 197-205.

7. Waerhaug J. The effect of rough surfaces upon gingival tissues. J Dent Res 1956; 35: 323-5.

8. Karlsen K. Gingival reactions to dental restoration. Acta Odontol Scand 1970; 28: 895-904.

9. Newcomb GM. The relationship between the location of subgingival crown margins and gingival inflammation. J Periodontol 1974; 45:151-4.

10. Valderhaug J, Ellingsen JK, Jokstad A. Oral hygiene, periodontal conditions and carious lesions in patients treated with dental bridges. A 15-years clinical and radiographical follow-up study. J Clin Periodontol 1993; 20: 482-9.

11. Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K. Clinical and microbiologic effect of subgingival restorations with overhanging or perfect margins. J Clin Periodontol 1983; 10: 563-78.

12. Wheeler RC. Some fundamentals in tooth form. Dental Cosmos 1928; 70: 889-92.

13. Wheeler RC. Restoration of gingival or cervical margins in full crowns. Dental Cosmos 1931; 73:238-42.

14. Wheeler R.C. Complete crown form and the periodontium. J Prosthet Dent 1961; 11: 722-34.

15. Morris ML. Artificial crown contours and gingival health. J Prosthet Dent 1962; 12: 1146-56.

16. Yuodelis RA, Weaver JD, Sapkos S. Facial and lingual contours of artificial complete crown restorations and their effects on the periodontium. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 29: 61-6.

17. Sundh B, Kohler B. An in vivo study of the impact of different emergence profiles of procera titanium crowns on quantity and quality of plaque. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 457-60.

18. Croll BM. Emergence profile in natural tooth contour. Part 1: Photographic observations. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 4-10.

19. Koidis PT, Burch JG, Melfi RC. Clinical crown contours: contemporary view. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 114: 792-5.

20. Kuo SB, Hong HH, Tsai TP, Shen YF. Developing an optimal emergence profile of the definitive restoration with a modified impression cap technique for ITI solid abutment. Prosthet Dent 2002; 88 : 646-8.

21. Croll BM. Emergence profile in natural tooth contour. Part 2: Clinical considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 374-9.

22. Ferencz JL. Maintaining and enhancing gingival architecture in fixed prosthodontics J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 650-7.

23. Stein RS, Kuwata M. A dentist and a dental technologist analyze current ceramo-metal procedures. Dent Clin North Am 1977; 21: 729-49.

24. Jameson LM, Malone WFP. Crown contours and gingival response. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 47:620-4.

25. Tung FF, Nourbakhsh N, Bahn C. Accurate procedure for simultaneous registration of gingival emergence profile and maximal intercuspal position for metal ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 681-5.

26. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: An art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 363-76.

27. Hooper SM, Huggett R, Foster LV. Teaching veneer and crown margins in UK dental schools. Dent Update 1993; 20: 192-6.

28. Sozio RB. The marginal aspect of the ceramometal restoration. The collarless ceramometal restoration. Dent Clin North Am 1977; 21: 787-801.

29. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Fisher OW. Preparation design and margin distortion in porcelain fused to metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 29: 276-84.

30. Seymour KG, Samarawickrama DYD, Lynch EJ. Metal ceramic crowns – a review of tooth preparation. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 1999;7: 79-84.

31. Seymour K, Zou L, Samarawickrama DYD, Lynch E. Assessment of shoulder dimensions and angles of porcelain bonded to metal crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75: 406-11.

32. Hunter AJ, Hunter AR. Gingival crown margin configurations: A review and discussion. Part 1: Terminology and widths. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 548-52.

33. Burke FJT. A synopsis of the adult dental health survey: Oral health in the United Kingdom 1998. Dent Update 2001; 27: 184-6

34. Seymour KG, Samarawickrama DYD, Zou L, Lynch E. Shoulder dimensions and angles of bonded crown preparations. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 553. Abs 1219.

35. Alhouri N, Watts DC, McCord JF, Smith PW. Mathematical analysis of tooth and restoration contour using image analysis. Dent Mat 2004;20: 893-9.

36. Northeast SE, Van Noort R, Johnson A, Winstanley RB, White GE. Metal-ceramic bridges from commercial laboratories: alloy composition, cost and quality of fit. Br Dent J 1992; 172: 198-204.

37. Donovan T, Prince J. An analysis of margin configurations for metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 153-7.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
   
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.