Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » By Affiliations
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top 20 Journal Cited
 » Top 20 Cited
 » Top 20 Author Cited
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Polishing Mechanism And Its Effect On The Mechanical Properties Of Ceramic Restorations - A Review Of The Literature

Ahmad R. (Rohana Ahmad), and Wu, B.M., and Morgano. S.M., (2001) Polishing Mechanism And Its Effect On The Mechanical Properties Of Ceramic Restorations - A Review Of The Literature. Annals of Dentistry, 8 (1). pp. 57-61. ISSN 0128-7532

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://ejum.fsktm.um.edu.my/ArticleInformation.aspx?ArticleID=430

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Dentistry. Dept. of Conservative Dentistry
Boston University Goldman. School of Dental Medicine. Dept. of Restorative Sciences and Biomaterials
Boston University Goldman. School of Dental Medicine. Dept. of Restorative Sciences and Biomaterials

Abstract

Polishing of dental ceramics has become an increasingly important procedure in restorative dentistry as allceramic restorations, which require post-cementation occlusal adjustment, are gaining in popularity. There are numerous studies in both dental and ceramic literature on polishing of dental ceramics and the effects of polishing on their mechanical properties. However, lack of standardization in polishing parameters, precludes comparison among these studies. A clear understanding is lacking of the relative roles and interdependence of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristic, and polishing load. This paper will discuss the mechanism of polishing and review the literature on polishing and its effect on the mechanical properties of ceramic restorations.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:polishing mechanism, polishing parameters, dental ceramic, mechanical properties.
Subjects:R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:2046

1. McLean lW. The nature of dental ceramics and their clinical use: Science and art of dental ceramics. Volume 1. Chicago Quintessence 1979; 61-114.

2. lagger DC, Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of unglazed, glazed, and polished porcelain on human enamel. 1 Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 320-323.

3. lacobi R, Shillingburg HT, Duncanson MG. A comparison of the abrasiveness of six ceramic surfaces and gold. 1 Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 303-309.

4. Malkin S. Theory and applications of machining with abrasives. Grinding Technology. Chichester, England. Ellis Horwood Limited 1989; 107-245.

5. Kalpakjian S. Manufacturing Engineering and Technology. Third Edition. Reading, Mass. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc. 1995;781-824.

6. Klausner LH, Cartwright CB, Charbeneau GT. Polished versus autoglazed porcelain surfaces. 1 Prosthet Dent 1982; 47: 157-162.

7. Sulik WD, Plekavich El. Surface finishing of dental porcelain. 1 Prosthet Dent 1981; 46: 217-221.

8. Raimondo RL, Richardson IT, Wiedner B. Polished versus autoglazed dental porcelain. 1 Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 553-557.

9. Patterson CIW, McLundie AC, Stirrups DR, Taylor WG. Efficacy of a porcelain refinishing system in restoring surface finish after grinding with fine and extra fine diamond burs. 1 Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 402-406.

10. Goldstein GR, Barnhard BR, Penugonda B. Profilometer, SEM, and visual assessment of porcelain polishing methods. 1 Prosthet Dent 1991;65: 627-634.

11. Hulterstrom AK, Bergman M. Polishing systems for dental ceramics. Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51: 229-234.

12. Haywood VB, Heymann HO, Kusy RP, Whitley lQ, Andreaus SB. Polishing porcelain veneers: an SEM and specular reflectaflce analysis. Dent Mater 1988; 4: 116-121.

13. Haywood VB, Heymann HO, Scurria MS. Effects of water, speed, and experimental instrumentation on finishing and polishing porcelain intra-orally. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 185~188.

14. Scurria MS, Powers 1M. Surface roughness of two polished ceramic materials. 1 Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 174-177.

15. Levy H. Effects of laboratory finishing techniques on the mechanical properties of dental ceramics. lnt Dent 1 1987; 69: 1039-1045.

16. Brackett S, Leary 1, Turner K, 10rdan RD. An evaluation of porcelain strength and the effect of surface treatment. 1 Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 446-451.

17. Fairhurst CW, Lockwood PE, Ringle RD, Thompson WOo The effect of glaze on porcelain strength. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 203-207.

18. Griggs lA, Thompson lY, Anusavice Kl. Effects of flaw size and auto-glaze treatment on porcelain strength. 1 Dent Res 1996; 75: 1414-1417.

19. Giordano R, Cima M, Pober R. Effects of surface finish on the flexural strength of feldspathic and aluminous dental ceramics. lnt 1 Prosthodont 1995; 8: 311-319.

20. Chen YC. Evaluation of the effect among different surface polish on the flexural strength of dental ceramics. Boston University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Mass., 1996. Master's thesis.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
   
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.