Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » By Affiliations
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top 20 Journal Cited
 » Top 20 Cited
 » Top 20 Author Cited
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Effect of Different Carbon Sources and Endogenous Nitrogen on Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation

Thurairetnam, S., and Arasaratnam, V., and Senthuran, A., (2006) Effect of Different Carbon Sources and Endogenous Nitrogen on Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation. Malaysian Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 13 (1). pp. 1-10. ISSN ISSN 1511-2616

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://ejum.fsktm.um.edu.my/ArticleInformation.aspx?ArticleID=586

Affiliations

University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka. Faculty of Agriculture. Dept. of Agricultural Chemistry
University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka. Faculty of Medicine. Dept. of Biochemistry

Abstract

In this study the starch based carbon sources such as wheat, corn, rice, manioc and soybean were tested. The study was carried out to investigate the best starch based carbon source for SSF process. Among the locally available starch based carbon sources, corn flour (in suspension 38%, w/w) could be used after liquefaction (with 0.225 KNUml-1 Termamyl) and endogenous protein hydrolysis (with 0.5 AUml-1 Neutrase) for simultaneous saccharification (0.8 AGUml-1 glucoamylase) and fermentation (by S. cerevisiae). The simultaneous saccharification and fermentation not only reduced the inhibition of fermentation by sugars but also reduced the total time required for this process from 85 to 67 h.

Item Type:Journal
Additional Information:The financial assistance of International Programmes in the Chemical Sciences is acknowledged
Keywords:Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation, Liquefaction, Endogenous protein
Subjects:Q Science, Computer Science
R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:2240

1. Inlow D, McRae J, Ben-Bassat. A. Fermentation of com starch to ethanol with genetically engineered yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 1988; 32 : 227-234.

2. Amin G, Mot DR, Dijck VK, Verachtert H. Direct alcoholic fermentation of starchy biomass using amylolytic yeast strains in batch and immobilized cell systems. Appl Microb Biotechnol 1985; 22: 237-245.

3. Lyons TP, Kelsall DR. Conversion of Biomass into fuels-Ethanol Food, feed and fuel from biomass. Eds. Chahal, S. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt.Ltd New Deihi. 1991; 371- 399.

4. Kein CR, Venkatasubramanium V. Economics of current biotechnological methods of producing ethanol. TI Biotechnol. 1989; 7 : 22-29.

5. Mullins JT. Enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of corn for fuel alcohol. Biotechnol Bioeng 1985; 27: 321-326.

6. Pearson D. The chemical analysis of Foods, 7th Ed. Edinburg, Churchill Livingstone, London. 1976; 11-12.

7. Huggins C, Russel PS. Practical Clinical Biochemistry, 5th Edition Ed. Varley EH, Gowenlock AH Bell M., William Henemann Medical Books Ltd., London, 1980; 1:1079-1081.

8. Miller GL. Use of Dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chem. 1959; 31: 426-428.

9. Lowry OH, Roseberough NJ, Farr AL, and Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Fdolin Phenol reagent, J Biol Chem. 1951; 193: 265-275.

10. Varley H, Gowenlock AH, and Bell M. Practical Clinical Biochemistry Vol. 2, 5th Ed. William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd., London. 1980; 314-317.

11. Hicks CP. Starch refining -1 processing process. Biochem 1970; 5 (6): 38-38.

12. Chaplin M. The use of enzymes in starch hydrolysis. http://www.sbu.ac.uk/biologytenztech/starch.html 2001.

13. Roushdi M. Ghali Y, Ahia, RM, El-din MA. Starch, 1979; 31: 414-417.

14. Arasaratnam V. Bioconversion of starch to glucose and glucose as feedstock for production of ethanol, lactic acid and fructose. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Biochemistry, University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka. 1989.

15. Kunhi AAM,. Ghildyal NP, Lonsane BK, Ahmed SY, Natarajan CP. Studies on production of alcohol from saccharified waste residue from cassava starch processing industries Starch 1981; 33 : 275-279.

16. Reddy AC, Abouzied MM.Glucose feedback inhibition of amylase activity in Aspergillus sp. and release of this inhibition when co cultured with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb Technol 1986; 7: pp 659-666.

17. Arasaratnam V, Balasubramanium K. Synergistic action of α-amylase and glucoamylase on raw starch. Journal of Microb Biotechnol 1992; 7(1): 37-46.

18. Mot DR, Dijck VK, Donkers A, Verachtert H. Potentialities and limitations of direct alcoholic fermentation of starchy material with amylolytic yeasts. Applied Microb Biotechnol 1985; 22: 222-226.

19. Kim K, Hamdy M.K.. Acid hydrolysis of sweet potato for ethanol production. Biotechnol and Bioeng 1985; 27: 316-320.

20. Lee G.M., Kim C.H., Yusof Z.A.M., Han M.H., Rhee S.K.. Sago Starch Saccharification and Simultaneous Ethanol Fermentation by Amyloglucosidase and Zymomonas mobilis. J.Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 1987; 38: 235-242.

21. Senthuran A, Senthuran V, Mattrason B, Kaul RH. Lactic acid fermentation in a recycle batch reactor using immobilized Lactobacillus casei. Biotechnol Bioeng 1997; 55 (6): 841-853.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
   
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.