Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » By Affiliations
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top 20 Journal Cited
 » Top 20 Cited
 » Top 20 Author Cited
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

A Comparative Account of the Bilingual Education Programs in Malaysia and the United States

Parilah Mohd Shah, and Fauziah Ahmad, (2007) A Comparative Account of the Bilingual Education Programs in Malaysia and the United States. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 7 (2). pp. 1-15. ISSN 1675-8021

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
84Kb

Official URL: http://www.fpbahasa.ukm.my/linguistics/Gema/page63_77.pdf

Affiliations

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities

Abstract

This paper looks at major challenges encountered in the stipulation and implementation of bilingual education in Malaysia and the United States. It analyses in a comparative manner the language history and profile; the rationale and types of bilingual programs;the challenges faced in the development and implementation of bilingual programs in the aspects of linguistic perception and resources; and the general solutions to overcome the problems. With respect to the linguistic situation,English has a strong influence on the society in the two countries, with English holding a much higher position in the United States. Bilingual education in Malaysia is geared more towards the maintenance of the mother tongue than the one in the United States. The United States’ bilingual program is more transitional in nature, although there are some schools that conduct maintenance programs. Some of the problems faced by the two countries are linguistic perception,shortage of teachers, lack of materials and the allocation of funds. Both countries embark on the same solutions to the problems. To improve the linguistic perception, the media plays a significant role by holding a system-wide public relation campaign to reduce linguistic competition. Availability of resources is made easily accessible by the two countries so that there is an increase in number and amount. These two countries accept constructive criticisms on their existing bilingual education programs; evaluation of this nature could ensure the best bilingual education for all.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Bilingualiam, Malaysia, bilingual education
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:235

Aleman, S. R. (1993) Bilingual Education Act: Background and reauthorization issues. Washington: Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 365163).

Amrein, A., & Pena, R. A. (2000). Asymmetry in dual language practice: assessing imbalance in a program promoting equality. Education Policy Analysis Archives. Retrieved 30 April 2007 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n8.html

Asmah Haji Omar. (1982). Language and society in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa and Pustaka.

Asmah Haji Omar. (1987). Malay and its sociocultural context. Kuala Lumpur: DewanBahasa and Pustaka.

Baker, C. (1993). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Clevedon,England: Multilingual Matters Bilingual Education Act. (1974). P. L. 93-380, (21 Aug. 1974), 88 Stat. 503.

BW Associates Berkeley. (1991). Meeting the challenge of language diversity. Santa Cruz: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.

Ching, F. (1995). Malaysia returns to English. Far Eastern Economic Review, 158, 32.

Freeman, R. D. (1996). Dual language planning at Oyster Bilingual School: “It’s much more than language”. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3):557-582.

Garcia, O. (1991). Bilingual education: Focusschrift in honor of Joshua A. Fishman on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing

Garcia, O. & Baker, C. (1995). Policy and practice in bilingual education. Clevedon,England: Multilingual Matters Gill. S. K. (2003). English language policy changes in Malaysia: Demystifying the diverse demands of nationalism and modernization. Asian Englishes, 6: 10-22.

Hawes, C. (1989). TESL in developing English world. TESL Canada Journal, 6: 91-94.

Malay Mail. (1989). Varsity books. Kuala Lumpur.

Mead, R. (1988). Malaysia's national language policy. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Southeast Asia Studies.

Ministry of Education, Malaysia. (1983). New primary school curriculum. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa and Pustaka.

Nik Safiah Karim. (1987). The development of a 'Bahasa Melayu Tinggi' variety in modern Malay. Paper presented to the European Colloquium on Indonesian and Malay studies, Indonesia.

Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs. (1994). Educatinglinguistically and culturally diverse students. Washinton, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Ozog, C. (1990). The English language in Malaysia and its relationship with the national language. In R. B. Baldauf & A. Luke (Eds.), Language Planning and Education in Australasia and the South Pacific (pp. 305-17). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Ozog, C. (1992). Bilingualism and national development in Malaysia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 14: 59-72.

Pillay, H., & Thomas, M. (2003). A nation on the move: Challenges in the implementation of major change in language policy. Asian Englishes, 6: 36-42.

Reddy, M. A. (Ed.) 1994. Statistical abstract of the world. Detroit, Micigan: Gale Reserach Inc.

Schnaiberg, L. 1996. Parents worry bilingual ed. hurts students. Education Week, 23: 9-11.

Steele, P. (1990). Testing and evaluating speaking at secondary level. Singapore:Regional English Language Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.

ED 326064)

Repository Staff Only: item control page