Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » By Affiliations
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top 20 Journal Cited
 » Top 20 Cited
 » Top 20 Author Cited
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Assessment of three Tropical Chlorophytes as Bioassay Organisms for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Enrichment in Freshwater Ecosystems

Chu, Wan Loy, and Ramadhona, Mala Silva, and Phang, Siew Moi, (2007) Assessment of three Tropical Chlorophytes as Bioassay Organisms for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Enrichment in Freshwater Ecosystems. Malaysian Journal of Science, 26 (2). pp. 15-25. ISSN 13943065

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://www.ejum.fsktm.um.edu.my/

Affiliations

International Medical University. Human Biology Section.
University of Malaya. Faculty of Science. Inst. of Biological Sciences.

Abstract

Enrichment of nitrogen and phosphorus in aquatic ecosystems can lead to excessive blooming of algae, resulting in eutrophication. The main objective of the present study was to assess the potential use of three tropical chlorophytes, namely Chlorella vulgaris UMACC 001, Scenedesmus
quadricauda UMACC 041 and Ankistrodesmus convolutus UMACC 101 as test organisms for the bioassay of nitrogen and phosphorus. The minimal medium used in this study was 1% Bold's Basal Medium (BBM), which contained 0.03 mM NaNO₃ or NH₄Cl and 0.02 mM phosphate (KH₂PO₄ and K₂HPO₄). The algae were grown in the minimal medium added with NaNO₃ or NH₄Cl ranging from 0.03, 0.15, 0.75, 3.75 to 18.75 mM for 96 hours using flask cultures. The dilution water without nitrogen and phosphorus was used as the control. For the phosphate experiments, the cultures were grown at 0, 0.02, 0.10, 0.50, 2.50 and 12.50 mM phosphate (KH₂PO₄ and K₂HPO₄) in 1% BBM containing 0.03 mM NaNO₃ or NH₄Cl. There was no marked difference in the specific growth rates (µ) of the three chlorophytes in response to nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment. The percentage growth enhancement (PGE₉₆) based on the percentage increase of cell number at 96 hours compared to that attained in dilution water was a useful parameter for the bioassay of nitrogen and phosphorus. The suitability of the algae as test organisms was assessed based on the linearity of the relationship between PGE₉₆ and nitrogen and phosphorus concentration, as indicated by the regression coefficient (R²). It was also based on the EC₅₀, which was the effective concentration that gave a PGE₉₆ of 50%. Based on the two parameters, Chlorella vulgaris was found to be a suitable test organism for the bioassay of NaNO₃ (EC₅₀ = 0.56 mM; R² = 0.98) while Ankistrodesmus convolutus was suitable for the bioassay of NH₄Cl (EC₅₀ = 0.005; r²= 0.86). When grown on NaNO₃, the sensitivity of Chlorella vulgaris to phosphate enrichment was very low (EC₅₀ = 822.72 mM). In comparison, when grown on NH₄Cl, the three algae were sensitive to phosphate enrichment (EC₅₀ = 0.08 - 0.12 mM). The three algae would be useful for the bioassay of phosphate in water samples containing NH₄Cl as the dominant nitrogen source.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Algae, bioassay, nitrogen, phosphorus, eutrophication
Subjects:Q Science, Computer Science
R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:2414

1. Vymazal J. (1994). Algae and Element Cycling in Wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida. pp. 334 - 431.

2. Carmago J. A. and Alonso A. (2006). Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: A global assessment. Env. Int. 32: 831- 849.

3. Anderson D. M., Glibert P. M. and Burkholder J. M. (2002). Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Nutrient sources, composition and consequences. Estuaries 25 (4): 704 -726.

4. Greer F. R. and Shannon M. (2005). Infant methaemoglobinaemia: The role of dietary nitrate in food and water. Pediatrics 116: 784-786.

5. Department of Environment (DOE) (2001). Malaysia Environmental Quality Report 2000. Department of Environment, Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment, Malaysia.

6. Dodds W. K., Jones J. R. and Welch E. B. (1998). Suggested classification of stream trophic state: Distribution of temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen, and phosphorus. Water Res. 32: 1455 - 1462.

7. Kallqvist T. and Svenson A. (2003). Assesment of ammonia toxicity in tests with the microalga Nephroselmis pyriformis, Chlorophyta. Water Res. 37: 477 - 484.

8. Yeh H. J. and Chen C. Y. (2006). Toxicity assessment of pesticides to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata under air-tight environment. J. Hazard. Mat. 131: 6 - 12.

9. Melor I., Phang S. M., Tong S. L. and Brown M. T. (2002). A modified toxicity testing method using tropical marine microalgae. Env. Monitor. Assess. 75: 145 - 154.

10. Rojickova-Padrtova R. and Marsalek B. (1999) Selection and sensitivity comparisons of algal species for toxicity testing. Chemosphere 38: 3329 - 3338.

11. Pipe A. E. and Shubert L. E. (1984). The use of algae as indicator of soil fertility. In: Algae as Ecological Indicators (ed. Shubert L. E.) Academic Press, London. pp. 213 - 236.

12. Walsh G. E. and Merril R. E. (1984). Algal assays of effluents. In: Algae as Ecological Indicators (ed. Shubert L. E.) Academic Press, London. pp. 329 - 362.

13. Maestrini S. Y., Droop M. R. and Boniri D. J. (1984). Test algae as indicators of seawater quality prospects. In: Algae as Ecological Indicators (ed. Shubert L. E.) Academic Press, London. pp. 133 - 188.

14. De Vries P. J. R. and Kamphof G. J. (1984). Growth of some strains of Stigeoclonium (Chlorophyta) on nitrate, ammonium, ammonium nitrate and urea. Br. Phycol. J. 19: 349 - 356.

15. De Kuhn R. M., Streb C., Breiter R., Richter P., Neebe T. and Hader D. P. (2006). Screening for unicellular algae as possible bioassay organisms for monitoring of marine water samples. Water Res. 40: 2695 - 2703.

16. Hogan A. C., Stauber J. L., Pablo F., Adams M. S. and Lim R. P. (2005). The development of marine Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) procedures using the unicellular alga Nitzschia closterium. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 48: 433 - 443.

17. Phang S. M. and Chu W. L. (2004). The , University of Malaya Algae Culture Collection (UMACC) and potential applications of a unique Chlorella from the collection. Jap. J. Phycol. 52: 221 - 224.

18. Phang S. M., Chui Y. Y., Geetha K., Susila J. and Hashim M. A. (2001). High rate algal ponds for treatment of wastewater: A case study for the rubber industry. In: Photosynthetic Microorganisms in Environmental Biotechnology (eds. Kojima H. and Lee Y. K.) Springer-Verlag, Hong Kong. pp. 51 - 76.

19. Foo S. T., Chu W. Land Phang S. M. (2001). Tolerance of four Malaysian chlorophytes to nitrate and ammonium pollution. Malay. J. Sci. 20: 15 - 20.

20. Phang S. M. and Chu W. L. (1996). Catalogue of Strains. University of Malaya Algae Culture Collection. Institute of Postgraduate Studies and Research, University of Malaya. pp. 1 - 77.

21. Nichols, H. W. (1973). Growth media-Freshwater. In: Handbook of Phycological Methods - Culture Methods and Growth Measurements (ed. Stein J. R.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 7 - 24.

22. ASTM (1993). Standard Guide for Conducting Static Toxicity Test with Microa1gae Method E 1218-90. In: 1993 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 11.04. American Society for Testing of Material, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. pp. 929 - 940.

23. Trainor F. R. (1984) Indicator algal assays: Laboratory and field approaches. In: Algae as Ecological Indicators (ed. Shubert L. E.) Academic Press, London, pp. 3 - 14.

24. De La Noue, Laliberte G. and Proulx, D. (1992). Algae and wastewater. J. Appl. Phycol. 4: 247 - 254.

25. Nash S. M. B., Quayle P. A., Schreiber U. and Muller J. F. (2005). The selection of a model microalgal species as biomaterial for a novel aquatic phytotoxicity testing. Aquat. Toxicol. 72: 315 - 326.

26. Skulberg O. M. (1995). Use of algae for testing water quality. In: Algae, Environment and Human Affairs (eds. Wiessner W., Schneph E. and Starv R.) Biopress Limited, Bristol, England. pp.181 - 199.

Repository Staff Only: item control page