Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Persepsi Pensyarah Terhadap Penerapan Kemahiran Komunikasi Menerusi Kokurikulum di Politeknik

Ahmad bin Esa, and Jailani bin Mohd. Yunus, and Noraini binti Kaprawi, (2005) Persepsi Pensyarah Terhadap Penerapan Kemahiran Komunikasi Menerusi Kokurikulum di Politeknik. Jurnal penyelidikan Pendidikan, 17 . pp. 1-13.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
517Kb

Official URL: http://209.85.175.104/search?q=cache:oGXTJ-vFbSYJ:www.moe.gov.my/index3.php%3Ffail%3D3%26y%3D1%26kategori%3Dpenyelidikan+Masalah+pendidikan+jurnal&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=my#3

Affiliations

Kolej Universiti Tun Hussein Onn. Fakulti Pendidikan Teknikal
Kolej Universiti Tun Hussein Onn. Fakulti Pendidikan Teknikal
Kolej Universiti Tun Hussein Onn. Fakulti Pendidikan Teknikal

Abstract

Tujuan kajian dijalankan ialah untuk meninjau persepsi pensyarah terhadap penerapan kemahiran komunikasi menerusi kokurikulum di politeknik-politeknik Malaysia. Reka bentuk penyelidikan yang digunakan ialah penyelidikan deskriptif jenis tinjau sampelyang melibatkan 291 orang pensyarah kokurikulum politeknik dengan menggunakan instrumen soal selidik dan temu bual. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan para responden memberi maklum balas positif terhadap penerapan kemahiran komunikasi menerusi kokurikulum di politeknik-politeknik. Didapati juga, secara keseluruhannya, tidakterdapat perbezaan persepsi yang signifikan di kalangan responden berlainan jantina dan jenis kokurikulum terhadap penerapan kemahiran komunikasi menerusi kokurikulum dipoliteknik. Walau bagaimanapun terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan di kalangan responden berlainan jenis kokurikulum terhadap penerapan beberapa kemahiran komunikasi menerusi kokurikulum. Kemahiran tersebut ialah menyampaikan maklumatdengan tepat, mentafsir lambang dan simbol dengan betul. Kajian ini menunjukkan bahawa kokurikulum dapat membantu membina kemahiran komunikasi di kalangan pelajar politeknik-politeknik di Malaysia.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Co-curriculum, communication skills, polytechnics, Malaysia
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:2588

Adnan Kamis (1993). “Aktiviti Kokurikulum Dasar KBSM: Ke Arah Kemantapan Insan Seimbang.” in Adnan Kamis (1993). “Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah: Pandangan Dan Maklum Balas. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 260 – 267.

Ab. Alim Abdul Rahim (1999). “Pengurusan Kokurikulum.” Kuala Lumpur: Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. 1 -10. Al. Ramaiah (1992). “Kepimpinan Pendidikan: Cabaran Masa Kini.” Petaling Jaya: IBS Buku Sdn. Bhd. 243 – 271.

Berita Harian (2004). “Lemah Komunikasi Punca Lepasan Universiti Gagal TemuDuga.” Berita Harian, 20 April 2004.

Berita Harian (2004). “ Kemahiran Analitikal Beri Kelebihan.” Berita Harian, 17 September 2004.

Briggs, H. dan Hodgson, P. (2000). “Generic Skills Development in Undergraduate Engineering Education in Australia.” http://www.hi.is/joner/eaps/cs_gene4.htm . Dicapai pada 13 Februari 2003.

California State University (1994). “University Policy Manual: Co-Curricular Courses.” Sacramento: California State University. http://www.csus.edu/acaf/univmanual/cocurcres.htm . Dicapai pada 22 Mac 2003.

Callan, V. J. (2003). “Generic Skills: Understanding Vocational Education and Training Teacher and Students Attitudes.” Adelaide: NCVER Ltd. 6 – 20.

Cascio, W. F. (1995). “Managing Human Resources.” New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. 192 – 224. Dawe, S. (2002). “Focusing on Generic Skills in Training Packages. “Kensington Park: National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) Ltd. 19 – 60.

De Leon, J. E. dan Borchers, R. E. (1998). “High School Employment Trends and the Skills Graduates Need to Enter Texas Manufacturing Industries.” Journal of Vocational and Technical Education. Vol. 15. N. 1. M.s. 1 – 18.

Hawke, G (2003). “Generic Skills’ in a Changing Work Environment.” Dalam Gibb, J. (2003). “Generic Skills in Vocational Education and Training.” Adelaide: NCVER Ltd. 19 -38.

Hishamuddin Mohd (2003). “Get Into The Business World.” Kertas kerja di “National IPT, Industry and Career Symposium 2003.”12-13 Julai 2003, di Century Mahkota, Melaka. Tidak diterbitkan.

Jackson, W. (1997). “Tracking the Development of Generic Skills: The Experience of 1987 and 1992 St. F. X. Graduates.” St. Francis Xavier University. 1-3.

Kearns, P. (2001). “Generic Skills for the New Economy.”Kensington Park: National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) Ltd. 41 -64.

Keystone Central School District (2002). “Philosophy of Co-Curricular Activities http://www.kcsd.k12.pa.us/guides/hs/cocurr.html . Dicapai pada 22 Mac, 2003.

Krejeie, R. V. dan Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research.Educational and Psychological Measurement. 207 -210.

Lendal, K (1997).”Management by Menu.” London: Wiley and Son Inco.

Matthews, B. (2000). “Co-Curricular Philosophy.” Bunbury: Bunbury Cathedral Grammar School. http://www.begs.wa.edu.au/home/co_curricalar.htm . Dicapai pada 21 Mac 2003.

Michigan State Universiti (1988). “Opportunities for Renewal: The Report of the Cauncil to Review Undergraduate Education.” Michigan: East Lansing. 42-50.

Mohamad Ismail bin Mohamad Yunus (2004). “Enhancing Student Character Building and Ethics Development Process Through Co-Curriculum Activities: IIUM Experience. Kertas Kerja International Conference on Student Development, 16 – 18 April 2004 di Hotel Pan Pacific, Kuala Lumpur. Tidak diterbitkan.

Mohd. Hamidi Abdul Hamid (2002). “Pengurusan Sekolah Cemerlang Menurut Islam.”Maran: Perniagaan Qomarul Roihan. 51-63

Mustafa Daud (1994a). “Pengurusan Islam.” Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications and Distributors Sdn. Bhd. 94-147.

Mustafa Daud (1994b). “Pekerjaan Dan Perusahaan Menurut Islam.” Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications and Distributors Sdn. Bhd. 38-53.

National Academy Foundation (2001). “Co-Curricular Enhancements.” USA: National Academy Foundation. http://nafnetwork.net/resources/NAFResourcesCenter/cocurricular. Dicapai pada 23 Mac 2003.

News Straits Times (2003). “Jobles Graduates Lack Critical Skills.” 20 Ogos 2004.

Omardin Ashaari (1996). “Pengurusan Sekolah”. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications and Distibutors Sdn. Bhd.. 124-149.

Potrafka, R. M. et. al (1997). “The World Wide Web, Student Organizations, and Co-Curricular Transcripts.” University of Missouri- Rolla. 1-12.

Raggat, P. (1995). “Competencies, Attributes and Curriculum: The Australian Agenda.” Dalam Burke, J. (1995). “Outcomes, Learning and the Curriculum.”London: The Falmer Press. 307-322.

Rohanida Ab. Manaf dan Mohd. Sofian Omar Fauzee (2002). “Kepentingan Kokurikulum Dalam Sistem Pendidikan.” Dalam Mohd. Sofian Omar Fauzee, Aminuddin Yusof dan Borhan Yusof (2002). “Kokurikulum Peranan Dan Implikasi.” Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications and Distributors Sdn. Bhd.

Stoner, A.F. dan Wankel, C. (1997). “Management (Terjemahan).” Petaling Jaya: Amiza Publishing Sdn. Bhd. 2-27.

Shamsaadal Sholeh Saad (2004). “Konflik Remaja Masa Kini dan Cabaran Menanganinya.” Kertas kerja Seminar Pembangunan Keluarga Kebangsaan 2004, 29-30 Mei 2004, di Universiti Malaya. Tidak diterbitkan.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.