Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Strategi Pendidikan Perniagaan di Alaf Baru

Mohd. Hizam Hanafiah, (2003) Strategi Pendidikan Perniagaan di Alaf Baru. Jurnal Pendidikan (UKM), 28 . pp. 15-32. ISSN 01266020

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://www.penerbit.ukm.my/jdidik28-02.pdf

Affiliations

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Faculty of Business Administration

Abstract

This article studied how UKM can achieve competitive advantage in business education in the new millennium. Internal analysis has been conducted to recognize strengths and weaknesses while external analysis has been done to identify opportunities and threats that they may face in the new millenium. SWOT Matrix was use to generate relevant alternative strategies depending on the current strengths, weaknesses, opportunites and threats. Formulating a flexible policy is the core strategy that needs change in administration policy, use as culture approach, university restructuring. It also includes complimenting the current infrastructure, breaking down the bureaucratic barrier, rechecking the process of management and development of human resources and lastly broading the university fund. Five important strategies which are proposed are developing a center for excellence in business education, restructuring education program, improving pedagogy and education strategy, rearranging publishing strategy and strengthening research strategies, consultation and social services.


Artikel ini mengkaji bagaimana UKM boleh memiliki kelebihan bersaing dalam pendidikan perniagaan di alaf baru ini. Untuk itu, analisis dalaman dilakukan untuk mengenalpasti kekuatan dan kelemahan semasa sementara analisis luaran dilakukan untuk mengesan peluang dan ancaman yang perlu dihadapi terutamanya di alaf baru ini. Seterusnya Matriks SWOT digunakan untuk menjana strategi-strategi alternatif yang sesuai berdasarkan kekuatan, kelemahan, peluang dan ancaman semasa. Pembentukan dasar yang luwes merupakan strategi teras yang memerlukan perubahan dasar pentadbiran, pendekatan budaya, penstrukturan semula organisasi, melengkapkan infrastruktur semasa, mengatasi halangan birokratik, menyemak semula proses pengurusan dan pembangunan sumber manusia serta meluaskan dana universiti. Lima strategi penting yang dicadangkan ialah pusat kecemerlangan pendidikan perniagaan, pembentukan semula program pengajian, pembaikan pedagogi dan strategi pendidikan, menyusun semula strategi penerbitan dan memperkemaskan strategi penyelidikan, perundingan dan khidmat masyarakat.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Business education, University business education
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:2755

Aigner, D. J. 1999. Business And The Environment: Towards A New Relationship. Selections 15(3): 1-8.

Anthony, P. 1986. The Foundation of Management. London: Tavistock.

Anonymous. 1999. China: Joint MBA Programs. East Asian Executive Reports 21(2):15-16.

Anonymous. 2000. Why Corporate Universities Are Flourishing. HR Focus 2: 13.

Armstrong, L. 2000. The B-School On Your Desk. Business Week. 3 April. hal. 154.

Barnett, R. 1993. The Idea Of Academic Administration. Journal of Philosophy of Education 27(2): 179-192.

Baruch, V. & Peiperl, M. 2000. The Impact of An MBA on Graduate Careers. Human Resource Management Journal 10(2): 69-90.

Boyatzis, R. E. & Kram, K. E. 1999. Reconstructing Management Education as Lifelong Learning. Selections 16 (1): 17-27.

Carnall, C.A. 1992. MBA Futures. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Case, P. & Selvester, K. 2000. Close Encounters: Ideological Invasion and Complicity on An ‘International Management’ Master’s Programme. Management Learning 31(1):

11-23.

Daniel, C. A. 1999. Management Education in Historical Perspective. Business History Review 73(3): 570-572.

Daniele, A. & Thomas, A. 1997. What about The Workers? Studying Work of Management Educators and Their Orientations to Management Education. Kertas kerja Annual Conference of The British Academy Of Management, London Business School, 8-10 September.

David, F. R. 1999. Strategic Management: Concept And Cases. 7th edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Delbecq, A. L. 1999. Rethinking Management Education. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(2): 439-443.

Department of Education and Science (DES). 1997. Meeting the Challenge. London. HMSO.

Dugan, M. K. Grady, W. R. Payn, B. & Johnson, T. R. 1999. Highlights of The GMAT Registrant Survey: Lessons Learned from a Decade Of Research. Selections 15(3):17-26.

Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (pnyt.). 1997. Universities And The Global Knowledge Economy. London. HMSO.

Ewing, J. 1999. Siemens: Building A ‘B-School’ in its Own Backyard. Business Week, 15 November. 109-110.

Fennell, F. 1991. Development of Assessable Standards for National Certification. London: HMSO.

Fernandez, I. B., Murphy, K. E. & Simon, S. J. 2000. Integrating ERP In The Business School Curriculum. Communication of the ACM 43(4): 39-41.

Forman, J. 1999. Management Communication & MBA Education: An Argument for Management Literacy. Selections 15(3): 9-16.

Godfrey, P. C. 1999. Service-Learning And Management Education: A Call to Action. Journal of Management Inquiry 8(4): 363-378.

Golembiewski, R. T. 1996. The Future of Public Administration: End of a Short Stay in the Sun? Or a New Day a Dawning? Public Administration Review 56(2): 139-148.

Hall, P. D. 1996. No One Nest Way: Management Careers And Curricula in an Era of Institutional Crisis. Paper presented to the Nonprofit Management Education 1996 Conference. Berkeley, CA. March 14-16.

Holman, D. 2000. Contemporary Models of Management Education in The UK. Management Learning 31(2): 197-214.

Hosmer, L. 1995. Trust: The Connectivity Link Between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethic. Academy Of Management Review 20: 379-405.

Hosmer, L. T. 1999. Somebody Out There Doesn’t Like Us: A Study of the Position and Respect of Business Ethics at Schools of Business Administration. Journal of Business Ethics 22(2): 91-106.

Jennings, M. M. 1999. What’s Happening in Business Schools? Public Interest 137:25-32.

Louis, M. R. 1990. The Gap in Management Education. Selections 6(3): 1-12.

Kane, K. E. 1993. MBAs: A Recruiter’s –eye View. Business Horizons 36(1): 65-71.

Kenworthy, A. L. 1999. Management Students as Consultant: An Alternative Perspective on the Service-Learning “call to action”. Journal of Management Learning 8(4):379-387.

Knight, M. 1999. Management Communication in US MBA Programs: The State of the Art. Business Communication Quarterly 62(4): 9-32.

Merritt, J. 2000. The Class of 2000. Business Week, 26 Jun: 52-60.

Mingers, J. 2000. What Is It to be Critical? Teaching a Critical Approach to Management Undergraduates. Management Learning 31(2): 219-234.

Mintzberg, H. 1992. Debate. Harvard Business Review Nov/Dec: 129.

Mirabella, R. M. & Wish, N. B. 2000. The ‘Best Place’ Debate: A Comparison of Graduate Education Programs for Nonprofit Managers. Public Administration Review 60(3): 219-234.

Murphy, K. & Dunkin, A. 1999. Welcome to the World of MBA.com. Business Week, 5 April: 120.

Ouchi, W. G. 1980. Market, Bureaucracies and Clans. Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 129-141.

Pearce II, J. A. 1999. Faculty Survey on Business Education Reform. The Academy of Management Executive 13(2): 105-109.

Pelton, J. N. 1996. Cyberlearning Vs The Universities: An Irresistible Force Meets an Immorable Object. Electronic Library.

Plater, W. M. 1995. Future Works: Faculty Time In The 21st Century. Change, May-June 27: 22-34.

Pollitt, C. 1993. Managerialism and the Public Services: Cuts or Culture Change in the 1980s. Oxford: Balckwell.

Reid, C. D. & Clifford, B. 1999. Developments in the Electronic Delivery of Information Services for Management Education. Business Information Review 16(3): 151-157.

Reingold, J. Schneider, M. & Capell, K. 1999. Learning to Lead. Business Week, 18 Oktober: 76.

Ryan, C. 1999. Trends In Business Curricula: The View From AACSB. Business Communication Quarterly 62(1): 91-95.

Salamon, L. M. 1999. Nonprofit Management Education: A Field Whose Time Has Passed? Dlm. Michael O’Neill & Kathleen Fletcher (pnyt), Nonprofit Management Education: US And World Perspectives. Wesport: Praeger.

Sheehy, G. 1995. New Passages: Mapping Your Life Across Time. New York: Random House.

Sunoo, B. P. 1999. MBAs Take HR To Higher Level. Workforce 78(5): 81-87.

Whicker, M. C. 1997. An Economic Perspective of Academic Tenure. Political Science and Politics, March 30: 21-25.

Willmott, H. 1997. Critical Management Learning. In J. Burgoyne & M. Regnolds (Pnyt.),Management Learning. London: Sage.

Wright, P. 1992. Learning Through Enterprise: The Enterprise in Higher Education Initiative. Dlm. R. Barnett (pnyt.), Learning Effect. Buckingham: SHRE/Open University

Press.

Zaini Ujang. 1993. Universiti: Mendukung Tradisi Intelektual. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Kajian Dasar (IKD).

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.