Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » By Affiliations
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Nucleolar Organizer Regions Distribution in Fine Needle Aspiration Cytological Smears from Breast Lesions

Hasnan J, and Jayaram, Gita , (1996) Nucleolar Organizer Regions Distribution in Fine Needle Aspiration Cytological Smears from Breast Lesions. Malaysian Journal of Pathology, 18 (1). pp. 35-41. ISSN 0126-8635

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://www.mjpath.org.my/past_issue/MJP1996.1/nucleolar%20organizer%20regions%20distribution.pdf

Affiliations

University of Malaya, Faculty of Medicine. Dept. of Pathology
University of Malaya, Faculty of Medicine. Dept. of Pathology

Abstract

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is now an integral part of the pre-operative investigation of breast lesions and the therapeutic protocol is today often planned on the basis of cytodiagnosis. However, from time to time the cytological picture may be equivocal or inconclusive. In recent years, nucleolar organizer region (NOR) scores have been explored for potential value in the diagnosis of malignancy as the scores in malignant nuclei are seen to be higher than in benign or reactive nuclei. With aview to applying NOR scoring in the evaluation of cytologically equivocal cases, we adopted the argyrophil technique for staining NOR S (AgNOR) in FNA cytological smears of 56 breast lesions, comprising 3 1 benign and 25 malignant lesions. Histological correlation was possible in 26 of these cases (17 malignant and 9 benign) and AgNOR scoring was done on paraffin sections of these as well. There was a significant difference between mean AgNOR scores in benign and malignant lesions in the cytological smears (P< 0.001). The AgNOR scores ranged from 2.5 to 5.0 per cell in benign lesions and 5.8 to 17.2 per cell in malignant lesions. None of the cases fell into the gray zone of overlap. One malignant lesion that was cytologically equivocal showed a mean AgNOR score of 6.08. The AgNOR scores on histological sections also showed a statistically significant difference (P< 0.001) between benign and malignant lesions with mean scores ranging from 1.34 to 2.58 dots per cell in benign lesions and scores of 2.42 to 5.28 dots per cell in malignant lesions. However, the scores overlapped in four cases and thcrefore it was considered unsuitable for routine diagnostic work. From this preliminary study, we conclude that an FNA AgNOR score of 5.0 and less strongly favours a benign lesion whereas a score above 5.0 would be in favour of amalignant lesion. A larger study would be needed to verify our impression that AgNOR scoring can be useful in cytologically equivocal cases.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Breast carcinoma, AgNORs, FNA cytology, histopathology
Subjects:R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:3447

1. Martin HE, Ellis EB. Biopsy by needle puncture and aspiration. Ann Surg 1930 ; 92 : 169-81.

2. Kline TS. Breast lesions diagnosis by fine needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Gynaecol Obstet 1979 ; 1 : 11-6.

3. Kline TS, Joshi LP, Neal HS. Fine-needle aspirate of the breast : Diagnosis and pitfalls. A review of 3545 cases. Cancer 1979 ; 44: 1458-64.

4. Kline TS. Masquerades of malignancy. A review of 4,241 aspirates from the breast. Acta Cytol 1981 ; 25(3) : 263-6.

5. Franzen S, Zajicek J. Aspiration biopsy in diagnosis of palpable lesions of the breast. Acta Radio1 1968 ;7 :241-63.

6. Koss LG, Woyke S, Olszewski. Aspiration biopsy: Cytologic interpretation and histologic bases. New York: Igaku Shoin, 1984 : 76.

7. Bibbo M, Scheiber M, Cejulis R, Keebler CM, Wied GL, Dowlatshahi K. Stereotaxic fine needle aspiration cytology of clinically occult malignant and premalignant breast lesions. Acta Cytol 1988 ; 32 : 193-201.

8. Maygarden SJ, McCall JB, Frable WJ. Fine needle aspiration of breast lesions in women aged 30 and under. Acta Cytol 1991 ; 35(6) : 687-94.

9. Strawbridge HTG, Bassett AA, Foldes I. Role of cytology in management of lesions of the breast. Surg Gyn Obst 1981 ; 152 : 1-7.

10. Frable WJ. Needle aspiration of the breast. Cancer 1984 ; 53 : 671-6.

11. Delazier-Blanket CD, Walt H, Engel E. Ectopic nucleolar organizer regions (N0R)s in human testicular tumours. Cytogenet Cell Gene 1986 ; 41 :107-13.

12. Hubbel HR. Hsu TC. Identification of nucleolus organizer regions (NOR) in nonnal and neoplastic cells by silver staining techniques. Cytogenet Cell Gene 1977 ; 19.

13. Underwood JCE, Gin DD. Nucleolar organizer regions as diagnostic discriminants for malignancy. J Pathol 1988 ; 155 : 95-6.

14. Anonymous. NORs - a new method for the pathologist. Lancet 1987 ; 1 : 1413-4.

15. Ayres JG, Crocker JG, Skilbeck NQ. Differentiation of malignant from normal and reactive mesothelial cells by argyrophil technique for nucleolar organizer region associated proteins. Thorax 1988 ; 43 : 366-70.

16. Boldy DAR, Crocker J, Ayers JG. Application of the AgNOR method to cell imprints of lymphoid tissue. J Pathol 1989 ; 157 : 75-9.

17. Cardillo MR. AgNOR technique in fine needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland masses. Acta Cytol 1992 ; 36 ((2) : 147-5 1.

18. cboper J, , ~ichaelLs. Argyrophilic NOR associated protein in stratified squamous epithelial of congenital Thorax 1987 ; 42 : 972-5.

19. CrockerJ, Ayres J, McGovern J. Nucleolarorganizer regions in small cell carcinoma of the bronchus. Thorax 1987 ; 42 : 972-5.

20. Egan MJ, Raafat F, Croker J, Smith K. Nucleolar organizer regions in small cell tumours of chilhood. J Pathol 1887 ; 153 : 275-80.

21. Egan MJ, Crocker J. Review. Nucleolar organiser regions in pathology. Br J Cancer 1992 ; 65 : 1-7.

22. Stahl A. The nucleolus and nucleolar chromosomes. In : Jordon EG, Cullis CA, eds. The Nucleolus. London : Cambridge University Press, 1982 : 1-24.

23. Ploton D, Menager M, Jeamesson P, Himber G, Pigeon F, Adnet J-J. Improvement in the staining and in the visualization of the argyrophilic proteins o the nucleolar organizer region at the optical level. Histochem J 1986 ; 18 : 5-14.

24. Smith R, Crocker J. Evaluation of nucleolarorganizer region associated proteins in breast malignancy. Histopathology 1988 ; 12 : 113-25.

25. Ohri AK, Herbert A, Rolye G. Nucleolar organizer regions in breast cancer. J Pathol 1988; 4 : 347a.

26. Giri DD, Nottingham JF, Lawry J, Dundas SAC, Underwood JCE. Limitations of the AgNOR technique in distinguishing between benign and malignant epithelial lesions of the breast. J Pathol 1988 ; 154 : 4a.

27. Sivridis E, Sims B. Nucleolar organizer regions : new prognostic variable in breast carcinomas. J Clin Pathol 1990 ; 43 : 390.

28. Mourad WA, Balis BE, Livingston S, Shoukri M, Cox CE, Nicosa SV, Rowlands DT. Argyrophilic nucleolar organizer regions in breast carcinoma. Correlation with DNA flow cytometry, histopathology, and lymph node status. Cancer

1992 ; 69 : 1739-44.

29. Misra K, Kumar ND. Nucleolar organizer regions in FNAC smears of breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 1992 ; 8 : 346-8.

30. Giri DD, Dundas SAC, Sanderson PR, Howat AJ. Silver-binding nucleoli and nucleolar organizer regions in FNAC of the breast. Acta Cytol 1989 ; 33(2) :

31. Crocker J, Boldy DAR, Egan MJ. How should we count AgNORs? Proposals for a standardized approach. J Pathol 1989 ; 158 : 185-8.

32. Croker J, MC Govern J. Nucleolar organizer regions in normal, cirrhotic and carcinomatous liver. J Clin Pathol 1988 ; 41 : 1044-8.

33. Croker J, Nar P. Nucleolar organizer regions in lymphomas. J Pathol 1987 ; 151 :

Repository Staff Only: item control page