Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » By Affiliations
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top 20 Journal Cited
 » Top 20 Cited
 » Top 20 Author Cited
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Component and Federation Concept Models in a Federated Database System

Masood, Nayyer and Eaglestone, Barry (2003) Component and Federation Concept Models in a Federated Database System. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, 16 (2). pp. 47-57. ISSN 0127-9084

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://mjcs.fsktm.um.edu.my/detail.asp?AID=268

Affiliations

Bahauddin Zakariya University
University of Sheffield

Abstract

A methodology for assigning interpretation to a database schema and to develop a federation context in the form of concept models is presented. The concept models are developed using the concepts from an ontology that acts as a semantic fulcrum in the schema integration methodologies. The ontology provides a common vocabulary to establish concept models. The benefit of establishing the concept models is twofold. One, it provides an interpretation to the component schemas of a federated database system. In this perspective it compensates the lack of semantic expressiveness of the current data models. Second, it becomes easier to compare different component schemas and to identify semantic similarities among them that is an essential step in schema integration, hence providing a basis for a semi-automated schema integration approach.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Schema integration, Schema analysis, Ontology, Concept hierarchies, Schema interpretation, Intrinsic semantics, In-context semantics
Subjects:Q Science
ID Code:368

M. Bonjour, G. Falquet, “Concept Base: A Support to Information Systems Integration”. CAISE*94, Utrecht, 1994.

S. Bressan, C. Goh, N. Levina, S. Madnick, A. Shah, M. Siegel, “Context Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in the Context Interchange System”. Applied Intelligence (13:2), September 2000, pp. 165-180.

C. Batini, M. Lenzerini, S. B. Navathe, “A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Database Schema Integration”. ACM Computing Surveys, 18, 4, December 1986, pp. 323-364.

Cattell, R. G. C. ed. The Object Database Standard: ODMG-93 Release 2.0. Morgan Kaufman San Francisco, 1996.

C. Collet, M. N, Huhns, W. Shen, “Resource Integration Using a Large Knowledge Base in Carnot”. IEEE Computer, Dec., 1991.

U. Dayal, H. Hwang, “View Definition and Generalization for Database Integration in a Multidatabase System”. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, November 1984, pp. 629-645.

B. Eaglestone, N. Masood, “Schema Interpretation: An Aid to the Schema Analysis in Federated Database Design”. First International CAiSE’97 Workshop on Engineering Federated Database System, Barcelona, Spain, June 1997, pp. 1-12.

T. Gruber, “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification”. Knowledge Acquisition, An International Journal of Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems, 5, 2, June 1993.

M. Garcia-Solace, F. Saltor, M. Castellanos, “Semantic Heterogeneity in Multidatabase Systems”. Object- Oriented Multidatabase Systems A Solution for Advanced Applications, Bukhres, O. A., Elmagarmid, A., Chapter 5, PHI, 1996.

V. Kashyap, A. Sheth, “Semantic and Schematic Similarities between Database Objects: A Context Based Approach”, 22nd VLDB, Bombay, 1996.

D. Lenat, R. V. Guha, Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project. Addison-Wesely, Reading, Mass., 1990.

J. A. Larson, S. B. Navathe, R. Elmasri, “A Theory of Attribute Equivalence in Database with Application to Schema Integration”. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, April 1989, pp. 449-463.

A. Motro, “Superviews: Virtual Integration of Multiple Databases”. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 13(7), 1987, pp. 785-798.

N. Masood, “Semantics Based Schema Analysis”. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Bradford, UK, February 1999.

N. Masood, “Semantic Heterogeneities: An Impedance to the Interoperability among Databases”. Accepted in Karachi University Journal of Science, University of Karachi, Pakistan, April 2000.

E. Mena, K. Kashyap, A. Sheth, A. Illaramendi, “OBSERVER: An Approach for Query Processing in Global Information Systems Based on Interoperation Across Pre-Existing Ontologies”, in Proceedings of the First IFCIS Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (COOpIS’96), Bressels, Belgium, June 1996.

S. Navathe, R. Elmasri, J. Larson, “Integrating User Views in Database Design”. IEEE Computer, 19(1), January 1986, pp. 50-62.

S. Navathe, A. Savasere, “A Schema Integration Facility Using Object-Oriented Data Model”, in Object- Oriented Multidatabase Systems: A Solution for Advanced Applications, PHI, 1996.

A. P. Sheth, S. K. Gala, S. B. Navathe, “On Automatic Reasoning for Schema Integration”. International Journal of Intelligent Co-operative Information Systems, 2(1), March 1993, pp. 23-50.

A. Sheth, V. Kashyap, “So Far (Schematically) Yet So Near (Semantically)”, in Proceedings, IFIP Wg 2.6 Conference on Semantics of Interoperable Database Systems (Data Semantics 5), North Holland, Amsterdam, 1993, pp. 283-312.

A. Sheth, V. Kashyap, “So Far (Schematically) Yet So Near (Semantically)”, in Proceedings, IFIP Wg 2.6 Conference on Semantics of Interoperable Database Systems (Data Semantics 5), North Holland, Amsterdam, 1993, pp. 283-312.

A. P. Sheth, J. A. Larson, “Federated Database Systems for Managing Distributed Heterogeneous and Autonomous Databases”. ACM Computing Surveys, 22(3), September 1990, pp. 183-236.

C. Yu, W. Sun, S. Dao, Keirsey, D., “Determining Relationships Among Attributes for Interoperability of Multi-Databases Systems”, in Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Interoperability in Multidatabase Systems, IMS, Kyoto, Japan, April 1991, pp. 251-257.

Repository Staff Only: item control page