Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Digital Versus Screen Film Mammography: A Clinical Comparison

Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz, (2008) Digital Versus Screen Film Mammography: A Clinical Comparison. Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal, 4 (4). 6p..

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
2885Kb

Official URL: http://www.biij.org/2008/4/e31/e31.pdf

Affiliations

University of Malaya, Faculty of Medicine, Dept. of Biomedical Imaging


Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Breast Carcinoma, Digital Film Mammography, Screen Film Mammography, cancer
Subjects:R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:4023

1. Lim GCC, Halimah Y, eds. Second report of the National Cancer Registry. Cancer incidence in Malaysia 2003. Kuala Lumpur: National Cancer Registry, 2004.

2. Gold RH, Bassett LW, Widoff BE. Highlights from the history of mammography. Radiographics 1990; 10(6):1111-31.

3. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH et al. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 2001; 91(9):1724-31.

4. Van Ongeval C, Bosmans H, Van Steen A. Current status of digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer. Curr Opin Intern Med 2007; 6(1):77-84.

5. Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ, Kuzmiak CM, eds. Digital Mammography. Philadephia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004.

6. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356(3):227-36.

7. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138(3):168-75.

8. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005; 353(17):1773-83.

9. Lewin JM, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE et al. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179(3):671-7.

10. Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S et al. Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography. Eur Radiol 2002; 12(11):2679-83.

11. Kim HH, Pisano ED, Cole EB et al. Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187(1):47-50.

12. Diekmann F, Bick U. Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography. Eur Radiol 2007; 17(12):3086-92.

13. Ranganathan S, Faridah Y, Ng KH. Moving into the digital era: a novel experience with the first full-field digital mammography system in Malaysia. Singapore Med J 2007; 48(9):804-7.

14. Haygood TM, Whitman GJ, Atkinson EN et al. Results of a survey on digital screening mammography: prevalence, efficiency, and use of ancillary diagnostic AIDS. J Am Coll Radiol 2008; 5(4):585-92.

15. Bick U, Diekmann F. Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know? Eur Radiol 2007; 17(8):1931-42.

16. Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Solari M et al. Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187(1):38-41.

17. Pisano ED, Cole EB, Kistner EO et al. Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology 2002; 223(2):483-8.

18. Tosteson AN, Stout NK, Fryback DG et al. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148(1):1-10.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.