Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Personal, Academic and Departmental Correlates of Research Productivity: A Review of Literature.

Zainab A.N., (1999) Personal, Academic and Departmental Correlates of Research Productivity: A Review of Literature. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 4 (2). pp. 73-110. ISSN 1394-6234

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://ejum.fsktm.um.edu.my/ArticleInformation.aspx?ArticleID=150

Affiliations

University of Malaya, Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, MLIS Programme

Abstract

Reviews published sources on research productivity under two broad categories, general measures of research productivity and correlates of publication productivity. The latter cover studies on three broad determinants comprising (1) personal, (2) academic, (3) and departmental correlates considered to be related to academic publication productivity.

Item Type:Journal
Additional Information:This note was added by the search_and_modify.pl script.
Keywords:Research productivity; publication productivity; correlates of productivity, scientometrics.
Subjects:Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Science
ID Code:415

Allison, P.D. and Long, J.S. 1990. Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 55: 469-478.

Allison, P.D. and Stewart, J.A. 1974. Productivity among scientists: evidence for accumulative advantage. American Sociological Review 39: 596-606.

Allison, P.D.; Long, J. Scott and Krauze, Tad K. 1982. Cumulative advantage and inequality in science, American Sociological Review 47: 615-625.

Andrews, Frank M. 1964. Scientific performance as related to time spent on technical work, teaching or administration, Administrative Science Quarterly, 9: 182-193.

Andrews, Frank.M. 1976. Creative process In: Pelz, Donald C and Andrews, Frank M. (eds). Scientits In: Organizations: productive climate for research development. Ann Abor, Mich: Institute of Social Research:

337-365.

Austin, Helen S. 1969. The women doctorate in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Austin, Helen S. 1978. Factors affecting women’s

scholarly productivity, In: The higher education of women: essays in honour of Rosemary Park. New York: Praeger: 133-157.

Austin, Helen S. 1984. Academic scholarship and its rewards In: Advances in motivation and achievement Vol.2, edited by Marjorie W. Steinkamp and Martin L. Maehr.

Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press.

Babchuk, Nicholas and Bates, Alan P. 1962. Professor or producer: the two faces of academic man. Social Forces 40: 341-348.

Babu, A Ramesh and Singh, Y.P. 1998. Determinants of research productivity. Scientometrics, vol.43, no.3: 309-329.

Barnhill, Robert and Linton, Marigold. 1992. Promoting research in science and engineering departments: a chair’s perspective. In: Innovation models for University research.

C.R. Haden and J.R. Brink (eds). Amsterdam: Elsier Science Publishers.

Bayer, A. E. and Dutton, Jeffrey E. 1977. Career age and research professional activities of academic scientists. Journal of Higher Education 48: 259-282.

Bean, John. 1982. A causal model of faculty research productivity. Paper presented at the nnual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

Behymer, Charles A. 1974. Institutional and personal correlates of faculty productivity. Ph.D. dissertations, University of Michigan.

Bentley, R.J. 1990. Faculty research performance over time and its relationship to sources of grant support. Ph.D thesis, University of Michigan.

Bentley, R.J. and Blackburn R.T. 1990. Changes in academic research performance over time: a study of institutional accumulative advantage. Research in Higher Education 31(4): 327-345.

Berelson, B. 1960. Graduate education in the United States. New York: McGraw Hill.

Biglan, A. 1973. Relationships between 23 subject matter: characteristics and the structure and output of university departments,Journal of Applied Psychology 57:204-213.

Blackburn, R.T. … et al. 1991. Faculty at work: focus on research, scholarship, and service. Research in Higher Education vol.32, no.4: 385-413.

Blackburn, R.T.; Behymer, C.E. and Hall, D.E. 1978. Researc notes: correlates of faculty publications. Sociology of Education. 51:132-141.

Bland, C.J. and Ruffin, M.T. 1992. Characteristics of a productive research environment: literature review. Academic Medicine, vol.67, no.6: 385-397.

Blau, Peter. 1973. The organization of academic work. New York: John Wiley.

Blume, S.S. and Sinclair, Ruth. 1973. Chemists in British universities: a study of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, 38: 126-138.

Boice, R. 1988. Chairs as facilitators of scholarly writing. The Department Advisor, vol. 3, no.4: 1-5.

Box, Steven and Cotgrove, Stephen. 1968. The productivity of scientists in modern industrial research laboratories. Sociology, 2:163-172.

Braun, T.; Glanzel, W and Schubert, A. 1990. Publication productivty: from frequency distribution to scientometric indicators. Journal of Information Science 16: 37-44.

Braxton, J.M. 1983. Department colleagues and individual faculty publication productivity. The Review of Higher Education vol.6, no.2: 115-128.

Budd, Hohn M. 1995. Faculty publishing productivity: an institutional analysis and comparison with library and other measures. College and Research Libraries.Vol.56, no.6: 547-554.

Calligaro, I.L.S…et al. (1991). Pharmacy research in academic institutions. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 55: 40-45.

Cartter A.M. 1966. An assessment of quality in graduate education. Washinton Dc: American Council on Education

Cattell, R.B. and Drevdahl, JE. 1955. A comparisonof the personality profile of eminent researchers with that of eminent teachers and administrators and that of the general population. British Journal of Psychology 46: 248-261.

Centra, J.A. 1983. Research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Research in Higher Education, vol.18, no.4: 379-389.

Chambers, Jack. 1964. Creative scientists of today, Science 145:1203-1205.

Chubin, Daryl E ; Porter, Alan L and Boeckman, Margaret. 1981. Career patterns of scientists. American Sociological Review 46: 488-496

Clark, S.M. and Corcoran, M. 1993. Perspectives on the professional socialization of women faculty: a case of accumulative disadvantage:? In: J.S.Glazer et al (eds). Women in higher education: a feminist press. Nedham Heights, MA: ASHE Reader Series, Ginn Press.

Clemente, Frank and Sturgis, Richard B. 1974. Quality of department of doctoral training and researh productivity. Sociology of Education 47:287-299.

Clemente, Frank. 1973. Early career determinants of research productivity. American Journal of Sociology vol.79no.2:409-419.

Cocoran, Mary and Clark, Shirley M. 1984. Professional socialization and contemporary career attitudes of three faculty generations. Research in Higher Education, 20:

131-153.

Cohen, J.E. 1991. Size, age and productivity of scientific and technical research groups. In, Igielnik, Simon. (1986). Testing the use of a Medical Centre-wide online current awareness service: BAC TM /Current contents, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science.

Cole, Jonathan R. 1979. Fair science. New York: The Free Press.

Cole, Jonathan R. and Cole, Stephen. 1973. Social stratification in science. Chicago: the univ of Chicago Press.

Cole, Jonathan R. and Zuckerman, Harriet. 1984. The productivity puzzle: persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists, In: Advances in

motivation and achievement: women in science. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press: 217-258.

Cole, Jonathan R. and Zuckerman, Harriet. 1987. Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science, Scientific American (Feb): 83-89.

Cole, S. 1979. Age and scientific performance. American Journal of Sociology 84:958-977.

Cole, S. and Cole, J.R. 1967. Scientific output and recognition: a study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review 32:377-390.

Collins, W. Andrew. 1971. Identifying and fostering productive researchers. An occasional paper from ERIC at stanford. Palo Alto, Calif: Stanford University. ERIC

Clearinghouse ED 047 538.

Cooper, J.O., Heron, T.E. and Heward, W.C. 1987. Applied behaviour analysis. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.

Crane, Diane. 1965. Scientists at major and minor universities: a study of productivity and reognition. American Sociological Review 30:699-714.

Creamer, Elizabeth G and McGuire, Sharon P. 1998. Applying the cumulative advantage pespective to scholarly writers in higher education, The Review of Higher Education,

vol.22, no.1: 73-82

Creswell, John W. 1985. Faculty research performance: lessons from the sciences and the social sciences. Washington : ERIC (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, no.4)

Creswell, John J. and Bean, John P. 1981. Research output, socialization and the Biglan model, Research in Higher Education vol.15, no.1: 69-91.

Creswell, John J. and Brown, M.L. 1992. How chairpersons enhance faculty research: a grounded theory study. The Review of Higher Education, vol.15, no.1: 41-62.

Creswell, John J.; Patterson, Robert A. and Barnes, Michael W. 1984a. Enhancing faculty research productivity. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Association for

the Study of Higher Education, Chicago.

Creswell, John J.;Patterson, Robert A. and Barnes, Michael W. 1984b. Low and high research producers: a career perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Chicago, Illinois.

Davies, Robert A. 1954. Notes on age and productive scholarship of a university faculty. Journal of Applied Psychology 38:318-319.

De Bruin, R.E. et al. 1993. A study of research evaluation and planning: the University of Ghent. Research Evaluation 3: 1-4.

Debackere, Koenraad and Rappa, Michael A. 1995. Scientists at major and minor universities: mobility along the prestige continuum, Research Policy, 24: 137-150.

Dent, P.L. and Lewis, D.J. 1976. The relationship between teaching effectiveness and measures of research quality. Education Research Quarterly (Fall): 3-16.

Diamond, A.M. 1984. An economic model of the life-cycle research productivity of scientists. Scientometrics, vol.6, no.3: 189-196.

Dickson, Vaugh A. 1983. The determinants of publication rates of faculty members at a Canadian university, The Canadian Journal of Higher Education vol.12:2

Eastman, Caroline M. 1989. Research productivity and breadth of interest revisited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol.40, no.5: 359-360.

Eckert, Ruth E. and Williams, H.Y. 1972. College faculty view themselves and their jobs. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

Elton, Charles F and Rose, H.A. 1972. What are the ratings rating. American Psychologist 27: 197-201.

Etzkowitz, H. 1992. Individual researcher and their research groups, Minerva 30: 28-50.

Fitschi, A.et al. 1980. Effects of size within two institution of sociology. International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education 4:19.

Folger, John K.; Austin, Helen S. and Bayer, Alan E. 1970. Human resources and higher education. New York: Russell Sage.

Fonseca, Lucia… et al. 1997. The importance of human relationships in scientific productivity: Scientometrics: vol.39, no.2 159-171.

Fox, Mary Frank. 1983. Publication productivity among scientists: a critical review. Social Studies of Science.13: 285-305.

Fox, Mary Frank. 1985. Publication, performance and reward in science and scholarship. In: J.C. Smart (ed). Higher education: handbook of theory and research. Vol.1: New York: Agathon Press: 225-283.

Fox, Mary Frank. 1992. Research, teaching, and publication productivity: mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education 65: 293-305.

Franklin, M.N. 1988. The community of sience in Europe: preconditions for research effectiveness in European Community countries. Aldershot, Hants: Gower.

Friedrich, G.W. 1985. Renewing the commitment to scholarship. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO.

Fulton, Oliver and Trow, Martin. 1974a. Research activity in American women in the United States. In : Martin Trow (ed) Teachers and students. New York: McGraw-Hill: Chapter 6: 199-248.

Fulton, Oliver and Trow, Martin. 1974b. Research activity in American higher education, Sociology of Education, 47: 29-72.

Fulton, Oliver. 1975. Research and fairness: academic women in the United States, In: Martin Trow (ed) Teachers and students. New York: McGraw-Hill: 263-274.

Gallant, Jonathan and Prothero, J.W. 1972. Weight watching at the university: the consequences of growth. Science 175: 381-388.

Garland, Kathleen and Rike, Galen E. 1987. Scholarly productivity of faculty at ALA accredited programs of Library and Information science. Journal of Education for

Library and Information Science 28: 87-98.

Golden, John and Carstensen, Fred V. 1992. Academic research productivity, department size and Organization: further results, Comment. Economics of Education Review

vol.11, no.2: 153-160.

Gordon, Gerald and Morse, Edward V. 1970. Creative potential and organizational structure In: M.J. Cetron and J.D. Goldhar (eds). The science of managing organized technology vol.2. New York: Gordon and Breach: 517-531.

Gunne, G Manny and Stout, Douglas W. 1980. Productivity and publication patterns in departments of educational administration, Journal of Educational Administration

vol.18, no.1: 140-147.

Guston, B.H. 1973. Charisma, recognition and motivation of scientists. American Journal of Sociology 78:1119-1123.

Guyer,L. and Fidell, L. 1973. Publications of men and women psychologists: do women publish less?. American Psychologist 28:157-160.

Hagstrom, W.O. 1965. The scientific community. New York, Basic Books.

Hagstrom, W.O. 1971. Inputs, outputs, and the prestige of university science departments. Sociology of Education, 44: 375-397.

Hammel, Eugene. 1980. Report of the task force on faculty renewal. Berkeley, Calif: University of California-Berkerley: 5.

Hamovitch, W. and Morgenstern, R.D. 1977. Children and the productivity of academic women. Journal of Higher Education 48:633-645.

Hargens, Lowell L. 1975. Patterns of scientific research: a comparative analysis of research in three scientific fields. Washington DC: American Sociological Association.

Hargens, Lowell L. and Hagstrom, Warren O. Winter. 1967. Sponsored and contest mobility of American Academic scientists. Sociology of Education vol.40, no.1: 24-38.

Hargens, Lowell L.; McCann, James C. and Reskin, Barbara F. 1978. Productivity and reproductivity: fertility and professinal achievement among research scientists. Social Forces. 57:154-165.

Harrington, M.S. and Levine, D.U. 1986. Relationship between faculty characteristics and research productivity. Journal of Dental Education vol.50, no.9: 518.

Harry, J. and Goldner, N.S. 1972. The “null” relationship between teaching and research. Sociology of Education 45: 47-60.

Hemlin, S and Gustafsson, M. 1996. Research production in the arts and humanities: a questionnaire study of factors influencing research performance. Scientometrics, vol.37, no.3: 417-432.

Holley, John W. 1977. Tenure and research productivity. Research in Higher Education 6 : 181-192.

Horowitz, Stephen M; Blackburn, Robert T. and Edington, Dee W. 1984. Some correlates of stress with health and work/life satisfaction for university faculty and administrators. Paper presented at the annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, March, Chicago,Illinois.

Hoyt, Donald P. 1970. Instructional effectiveness.In: Inter-relationships with publication records and monetary rewards. (Research report no 10). Manhattan: Office

of Educational Research, Kansas State Univversity.

Irvin, John. and Martin, B.R. 1985. Basic research in the East and West: a comparison of the scientific peformance of high energy physics accelerators. Social Studies

of Sciences 15: 293-341.

Johnston, R. 1994. Effects of resource concentration on research performance. Higher Education, 28: 25-37.

Jordan, John M.; Meador, Mark and Walter, Stephen J.K. 1988. Effects of department size and organization on the research productivity of academic economists, Economics

of Education Review, vol.7, no.2: 251-255.

Jordan, John M.; Meador, Mark and Walter, Stephen, J.K. 1989. Academic research productivity, department size and organization: further results, Economics of Education

Review, 8:345-352.

Jungnickel and Crewswell. 1994. Workplace correlates and scholarl performance of clinical pharmacy faculty. Research in Higher Education, vol.35, no.2: 167-194.

Kasten, Katherine Lewellan. 1984. Tenure and merit pay as rewards for research, teaching, and service at aresearch university. Journal of Higher Education, 55(4):500-514.

Katz, D.A. 1973 Faculty salaries, promotion, and productivity at a large university, American Economic Review, 63: 469-477.

Kidwai, A.R. 1969. Recruitment and training of scientific research personnel Indian Journal of Public Administration 15: 576-587.

Knapp, Robert. 1963. Demographic, cultural and personality attributes of scientists InL C. Taylor and F. Barron (eds). Scientific creativity: its recognition and development. New York: John Wiley.

Knorr, K.D. et al 1979. Individual productivity as a social position. Effect in Academic and Industrial Research Unit In: F.M. Andrews (ed), Scientific productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapter 3.

Koenig, M.E.D. 1982a. Bibliometric indicators versus expert opinion in assessing research performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science vol.34,

no.2: 136-145.

Koenig, M.E.D. 1982b. Determinants of expert judgement of research performance. Scientometrics, vol.4, no.5: 361-378.

Krebs, H.A. 1967. The making of a scientists. Nature 215: 1441-1445.

Kremer, J.M. 1980 Information flow among engineers in a design company. Ph.D

Kyvik, Svein. 1990a. Age and scientific productivity: differences in fields of learning. Higher Education, 19: 37-55.

Kyvik, Svein. 1990b. Motherhood and scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 20: 149-160.

Kyvik, Svein. 1991. Productivity in academia. Scientific publishing at norwegian universities.Norwegian University Press.

Kyvik, Svein. 1995. Are big university departments better than small ones?. Higher Education, 30:295-304.

Kyvik, Svein and Smeby, Jens-Christian. 1994. Teaching and research. The relationship between the supervision of graduate students and faculty research performance. Higher Education 28: 227-239.

Lawani, S.M. 1986. Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics vol.9, no.1-2:13-25.

Lawrence, Janet H. and Blackburn, Robert T. 1988. Age as a predictor of faculty productivity: three conceptual approaches. Journal of Higher Education, vol.59,no.1:22-38.

Lazersfeld, Paul F and Thielen, Wagner. 1958. The academic mind: social scientists in a time crisis. Glencoe, Ill. : The Free Press.

Lehman, Harvey C. 1953. Age and achievement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Levin, Sharon G. and Stephan, Paula E. 1989. Age and research productivity of academic scientists. Research in Higher Education vol.30, no.5: 1989.

Lightfield, E. Timothy. 1971. Output and recognition of sociologists. The American sociologists 6: 128-133.

Lodahl, J.B. and Gordon, G. 1972. The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. American Sociological Review 37:57-72.

Long, John S. 1978. Productivity and academic position in the scientific career. American Sociological Review, 43:889-908.

Long, John S. 1992. Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces vol.7, no.1:159-178.

Long, John S.; Allison, Paul D. and McGinnis, R. 1979. Entrance into the academic career. American Sociological Review 44: 816-830

Long, John S. and McGinnis, R. 1981. Organizational context and scientific productivity. American Sociological Review 46: 422-442.

Long, John. S. ; Allison, Paul D. and McGinnis, R. 1993. Rank advancement in academic careers: sex differences and the effects of productivity. American Sociological Review. 58: 703-722.

Luukkonen-Gronow, T. and Stole-Heiskanen,V. 1983. Myths and realities of role incompatibilty of women scientists, Acta Sociologica, 26:267-280.

Manis, Jerome G. 1951. Some academic influences upon publication productivity. Social Forces 29: 269-272.

Martin, B.R. 1996. The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics, vol.36, no.3: 343-362.

Martin, B.R. and Irvine, J. 1983. Assessing basic research: some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research Policy 12: 61-90.

Meador, Mark; Walters, Stephen J.K. and Jordan, John M. 1992. Academic research productivity: reply, still further results. Economics of Education Review, vol.11,no.2:161-167.

Meltzer, Bernard N. 1949. The productivity of social scientists. The American Journal of Sociology: 25-29.

Meltzer, Leo. 1956. Scientific productivity in organizational settings. Journal of Social Issues 12: 32-40.

Merton, Robert (ed). 1973b. The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Merton, Robert. 1973a. The Mathew effect in science In: Merton, Robert. The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Michalak, Stanley J. and Friedrich, Robert J. 1981. Research productivity and teaching effectiveness at a small liberal arts college. Journal of Higher Education 52(6): 578-597.

Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press: 195-226.

Moed, H.F. et al. 1983. On the measurement of research performance: the use of bibliometric indicators. Leiden: Sciences Studies Unit, University of Leiden.

Moravcsik, M.J. 1985. Applied scientometrics: an assessment methodology for developing countries. Scientometrics vol.7, no.3-6: 165-176.

Nederhof, A.J. and Raan, A.F.J. van. 1987. A validity study of bibliometric indicators: the comparative performance of cum laude doctorates in chemistry. Scientometrics, 17:427-435.

Neumann, R. 1992. Perceptions of the teaching research nexus: a framework for analysis. Higher Education, vol.23, no.2: 159-171.

Neumann, Yoram. 1979. Research productivity of tenured and non-tenured faculty in US universities: a comparative study of four fields and policy implications. The Journal

of Educational Administration 17: 92-101.

Over, Ray. 1982. Does research productivity decline with age. Higher Education vol.11 no.5: 511-520.

Parker, Edwin B.; Lingwood, David A and Paisley, William J. 1968. Communication and research productivity in an inter-disciplinary behavioral science research area.

Stanford University, California institute for Communication Research. Spring-field, VA: National Technical Information Service.

Parsons, Talcott and Platt, Gerald. 1968.The American academic profession: a pilot study. Grant G55B, National Science of Education.

Pelz, Doald C. and Andrews, Frank M. 1976. Scientists in organizations: productive climates for research and development. Ann Arbor, Mich: Institute for Social Research

Pelz, Donald C & Andrews, Frank M. 1966, Scientists in organizations: productive climates for research and development. New York: John Wiley.

Prpic, Katarina. 1996a. Characteristics and determinants of eminent scientist’ productivity. Scientometrics 36: 185-206.

Prpic, Katarina. 1996b. Scientific fields and eminent scientists’ productivity patterns and factors. Scientometrics, vol.37, no.3: 445-471.

Qurashi, M.M. 1993. Dependence of publication rate on size of some university groups and departments in UK and Greece

in comparison with N.C.I., USA. Scientometrics vol.27, no.1: 19-38.

Raan, A.F.J van. 1989. Evaluation of research groups. In: The evaluation of scientific research. Chichester: John Wiley.

Ramsden, P. 1994. Describing and explaining research productivity. Higher Education 28: 207-226.

Ramsden, P. and Moses, I. 1992. Associations between research and teaching in Australian higher education. Higher Education, vol.23, no.3: 273-295.

Raymond, Jerral C. 1967. Publication, production of knowledge and career patterns of American Economists. Ph.D thesis. University of Virginia.

Reskin, Barbara F. 1977. Scientific productivity and the reward structure of science. American Sociological Review 42:491-504.

Reskin, Barbara F. 1978a. Scientific productivity, sex and location in the institution of science. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 1235-1243.

Reskin, Barbara F. 1978b. Sex differentiation and the social organization of science. In: J. Gaston (ed).The sociology of science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 6-37.

Reskin, Barbara F. 1979. Academic sponsorship and scientists careers, Sociology of Education 52: 129-146.

Roe, A. 1952. A psychologist examines 64 eminent scientists, Scientific American 187:21-25.

Roe, A. 1953a. The making of a scientists. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company.

Roe. A. 1953b. A psychological study of eminent psychologists and anthropologist and a comparison with biological and physical scientists, Psychological Monographs 67:2.

Roe, A 1964. Psychology of scientists In: K. Hill (ed). The management of scientists. Boston, Mass. : Beacon Press: 49-71.

Roe, A. 1982. Patterns in productivity of scientists, Science 176: 940-941.

Roose, Kenneth D and Anderson, Charles J. 1970. A rating of graduate programs. Washington, D.C.: American Council on

Education.

Rushton, J.P., Murray, H.G. and Paunonen, S.V. 1987. Personality characterstics associated with high research productivity In: D.N. Jackson and J.P. Rushton (ed)

Scientific excellence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Chapter 5.

Shepard, H.A. 1956. Creativity in R/D teams, Research and Engineering (Oct): 10-13.

Simon, Rita James. 1974. The work habits of eminent scientists. Sociology of work and occupation 1:327-335.

Simon, Rita.James.; Clark, S.M. and Galway, K. 1967. The women Ph.D: a recent profile. Social Problems. 15: 221-236.

Singh, Y.P and Laharia, S.N. 1986. Interpersonal ommunication and scientific productivity, Interaction, no.4:27-32.

Skinner, B.F. 1953. Science and human behaviour. New York: MacMillan.

Small, H.G. 1974. Characteristics of frequently cited papers in chemistry. Final report on contract number NSF-C795, Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.

Snyder, Julie K. ; McLaughlin and Montgomery,James R. 1991. Factors contributing to research excellence. Research in Higher Education. Vol.32, no.1:45-48.

Soldofsky, Robert M. 1984. Age and productivity of University faculties: a case study. Economics of Education Review vol.3, no.4: 289-298.

Sonnert, Gerhard. 1995. What makes a good scientists?: determinants of peer evaluation among biologists, Social Studies of Science, 25: 35-55.

Stankiewicz, R. 1979a. The size and age of Swedish academic research groups and their scientific performance. In: Frank M. Andrews (ed), Scientific productivity: the

effectiveness of research groups in six countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stankiewicz, R.1979b. The effects of leadership on the relationship between the size of research groups and their scientific performance.R & D Management 9: 207-212.

Subramaniam, K. 1984. Research productivity and breadth of interest of computer science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 35: 369-371.

Taylor, Calvin W. and Barron, Frank. 1963. Scientific creativity: its recognition and development. New York: john Wiley.

Taylor, Calvin W. and Ellison, Robert L. 1967. Biographical predictors of scientific performance. Science vol.155 , no.3765: 1975-1980.

Thagaard, T. 1986. Scientific communities. Oslo: Dept of Sociology, Univ of Oslo.

Tien, Flora F. and Blackburn, Robert T. 1996. Faculty rank system, research motivation, and faculty research productivity: measurement refinement and theory testing. Journal of Higher Education, vol.67, no1: 2-22.

Voeks, V.W. 1962. Publications and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education. 33:212-218.

Vollmer, Howard M. 1970. Ealuating two aspects ofquality in research program effectiveness In: Cetron, M.J and Goldhar, J.D. (eds). The science of managing organized technlogy. New York: Gordon and Breach, vol. 4:1487-1501

Wade, N. 1975. Citation analysis: a new tool for science administrators, Science 188: 429-432.

Wallmark, H.J. and Sellerberg, B. 1966. Efficiency vs. size of research teams, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM-13: 137-142.

Wallmark, H.J. et al. 1973. The increase in efficiency with size of research teams, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM-20: 80-86.

Wanner, Richard A; Lewis, Lionel S. and Gregorio, David I. 1981. Research productivity in academia: a comparative study of the science, social sciences, and humanities.

Sociology of Education 54: 238-253.

Waworuntu, Bob. 1986a. Productivity of faculty in Indonesian Public Higher Education. Ph. D. thesis, State University of New York at Albany. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms International, 1986.

Waworuntu, Bob. 1986b. The research productivity of faculty in Indonesian Public Higher Education. Ph.D thesis. State University of New York at Albany.

Webster,D.S. 1985. Does research productivity enhance teaching?. Educational Record, 66: 60-63.

Wells, W.P. 1962. Group age and scientific performance. Ph.D thesis.- University of Michigan.

Wells, W.P. and Pelz, D.C. 1966. Groups. In: Pelz, D.C. and Andrews, F.M. Scientists in organizations. New York: Wiley.

Westbrook, J.H. 1960.Identifying significant research. Science 132: 1229-1234.

Wilson, L. 1942. The academic man. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wispe, Lauren G. 1969. The bigger the better: productivity, size and turnover in a sample of psychology departments. American Psycholgist 24: 662-668.

Woods, Fiona. 1990). Factors influencing research performance of university academic staff. Higher Education 19: 81-100.

Ziman, J. 1989. Restructuring academic science. London: Science Policy Support Group.(Concept paper no. 8).

Zuckerman, H.A.and Merton, R.K. 1971. Patterns of valuation in science: institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system, Menirva, 9: 66-100.

Zuckerman, Harriet. 1970. Stratification in American science in E O. Laumann (ed) Social Stratification: research and theory for the 1970s. New York: Bobbs-Merrill:

235-254.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.