Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Using Product Platform Architecture for Identification of Part Commonality in Support of Design for Modularity

Abdullah A.B., and Kamaruddin A.R., and Ripin Z.M., (2004) Using Product Platform Architecture for Identification of Part Commonality in Support of Design for Modularity. Jurnal Kejuruteraan, 16 . pp. 49-65. ISSN 0128-0198

Full text not available from this repository.

Affiliations

Universiti Sains Malaysia. School of Mechanical Engineering
Universiti Sains Malaysia. School of Mechanical Engineering
Universiti Sains Malaysia. School of Mechanical Engineering

Abstract

Modular approach is one of the best design techniques as it promotes better and faster designing process. Due to functional independence and physical similarities, it tends to drive platform development. This paper will discuss the application of modularity approach to drive for platform design from a multi-family home appliances product. By utilising the conventional heuristics rules to identify modules, a platform is then developed so that it can be shared among those products. Three consumer products from different family are used as case study. As a result, a new design is proposed with several improvements to the products in terms of part count and part commonality.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Modular approach, heuristic approach, platform, commonality.
Subjects:Q Science, Computer Science
T Technology, Engineering
ID Code:4180

Abdullah, A. B. & Ripin, Z. M. 2002. Module identification method: a qualitative and quantitative approach.World Engineering Congress 2002, Sarawak, Malaysia, pp. 38-42.

Abdullah, A. B. & Ripin, Z. M. 2003. Modularization to support product platform for redesign. ]9th Int. Conf on CAD/CAM, Robotics and Factories of the Future 2003. Vol. I., pp. 333-345.

Brenmer, R. 1999. Cutting edge platform. Financial Times: Automotive World, pp. 30-38.

Gonzalez-Zugasti, J., & Otto, K. 2000. Modular platform-based product family design. ASME Design Automation Conference, Baltimore.

Gonzalez-Zugasti, J., Baker, J. & Otto, K. 2000. A method for architecting product platform with an application to interplanetary mission design. Research in Engineering Design 12: 61-72.

Jiao, J. & Tseng, M. M. 2000. Understanding product family for mass customization by developing commonality indices. J. Mech. Design 11(3): 225-243.

Huang, C. C. & Kusiak, A. 1998. Modularity in design of products and systems. IEEE Trans. On Sys, Man and Cyber Part A: Systems and Humans. 28(1): 66-77.

Huang, C. C. 2000. Overview of modular product development. Proc. National Science Council, ROC (A). 24(3): 149-165.

Kota, S., Sethuraman K & Miller, R. 2000. A metric for evaluating design commonality in product families. J. Mech. Design 122: 403-410.

Martin, M. & Ishii, K. 1997. Design for variety: development of complexity indices and design charts. ASME DETC.

Pahl, G. & Beitz, W. 1998. Engineering design. London: The Design Council, Perera, H. S. C., Tabucanon, M. T. & Nagaruru, N. 1999. Component part standardization: a way to reduce life-cycle costs of products. Int. J. Prod. Econ.60-61: 109-116.

Stone, R. B., Wood, K. L. & Crawford, R. H. 2000. A heuristics method for identifying modules for products architectures. Design Studies. 21: 5-31.

Sudjianto, A. & Otto, K. 2001. Modularization to support multiple brand platforms, Pittsburgh: ASME DTM.

Ulrich, K. & Tung, K. 1991. Fundamentals of product modularity. In Sharon, A. (Ed.), Issues in design/manufacture integration, pp. 73-79. New York: ASME.

Repository Staff Only: item control page