Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » By Affiliations
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Graft Selection in Rinoplasty : Indications and Limitations

Gendeh, B.S., and Mallina S., (2008) Graft Selection in Rinoplasty : Indications and Limitations. Medical Journal of Malaysia, 63 (1). pp. 35-38. ISSN 0300-5283

Full text not available from this repository.

Affiliations

Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Dept. of ENT.
Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Dept. of ENT.

Abstract

The nasal profile and skin thickness in the Caucasian Indian vary from the Oriental Chinese or Malay noses. Reduction rhinoplasty is more common in the Caucasian Indian noses whereas augmentation rhinoplasty is more common in the Oriental Chinese or Malay noses. Graft selection remains the greatest challenge for surgeons performing rhinoplasty. However, the preferred choice as far as possible for nasal reconstruction would be autografts as compared to allografts due to their lower rate of infection, extrusion and they do not induce an immune response. We have evaluated 40 patients and compared our experience with the grafts available over a period of 46 months.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Caucasian Nose, Oriental Nose, Rhinoplasty, Allografts, Autografts
Subjects:R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:4251

1. Staffel G, Shockley w. Nasal implants. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995; 28: 295-308.

2. Camarena LC, Guerra MT. Use of cartilaginous autografts in nasal surgery: 8 years of experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 1003-14.

3. Constantian, M. B. Indications and use of composite grafts in 100 consecutive secondary and tertiary rhinoplasty patients: Introduction of the axial orientation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg 2002; 110: 1116.

4. Neu BR. Combined conchal cartilage-ethmoid bone grafts in nasal surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 160-70.

5. Gendeh B.S., Vincent, S.T. Open septorhinoplasty: Operative technique and grafts. Medical Journal of Malaysia 2007; 62(1): 13-18.

6. Tardy ME. Denney J, Fritsch MH. The versatile cartilage autograft in reconstruction of the nose and face. Laryngoscope 1985; 95: 523-33.

7. Peck GC. The onlay graft for nasal tip projection. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 71: 27-37.

8. Sheen JH. Achieving more nasal tip projection by the use of a small autogenous vomer or septal cartilage graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 56: 3540.

9. Gunter, J.P., Clark, C.P., and Friedman, R. M. Internal stabilization of autogenous rib cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty: A barrier to cartilage warping flast. Reconstr. Surg 1997; 100: 161.

10. Spencer MG. Chondroplastic graft augmentation rhinoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 1990 104: 539-43.

11. Dhong, E. S., Han, S. K., Lee, C. H., Yoon, E. S., and Kim, W. K. Arithropometric study of alar cartilage in Asians. Ann. Plast. Surg 2002; 48: 386.

12. Ducut, Erick G, Han, Seung-Kyu, Kim, Sang-Bum M.D, Kim, Yang-Soo, Kim, Woo-Kyung. Factors Affecting Nostril Shape in Asian Noses. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118: 1613-21.

13. Constatian MB, Clardy RB. The relative importance of septal and nasal valvular surgery its correcting airway obstruction in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 98: 38-54.

14. Claus w. The evolution of rhinoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 1988; 102: 1079-85.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
   
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.