Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Publication Productivity, Focus on Institutional, Collaborative and Communicational Correlates: A Review of Literature.

Zainab A.N., (2000) Publication Productivity, Focus on Institutional, Collaborative and Communicational Correlates: A Review of Literature. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 5 (1). pp. 53-94. ISSN 1394-6234

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://ejum.fsktm.um.edu.my/ArticleInformation.aspx?ArticleID=154

Affiliations

University of Malaya, Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, MLIS Programme

Abstract

Review studies on academic research assessment comprising: the counting of publication output, citation counts, weighting publications, peer ratings, recognition and multiple indicators. Also describes institutional correlates of publication productivity such as funding, library resources and electronic support. Studies on other correlates such as collaboration, information use and dissemination are also described.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Publication productivity; Research output; Institutional correlates. Collaboration, Channels of communication; Information use; Dissemination of information; Weighting of publications; Citation counts; Peer rating.
Subjects:Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Science
ID Code:428

Abels, E.G.; P. Liebscher and D.W. Denman, D.W. 1996. Factors that influence the use of electronic networks services by science and engineering facuty in small universities and colleges. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol.47: 146-158.

Abrams, Peter A. 1991. The predictive ability of peer review of grant proposals: the case of ecology and the US National science Foundation. Social Studies of Science, Vol.21: 111-132.

Abt, H.A. 1984. Citations to single and multi-authored papers. Publications of the Astronomical Society the Pacific, Vol.96: 746-749.

Adams, J.A. and S.C. Bonk. 1995. Electronic information technologies and resources: use by university faculty and faculty preferences for related library services. College and Research Libraries, Vol.56: 119-131.

Allen, Robert S. 1991. Physics information and scientific communication: informal sources and communication patterns. Science and Technical Libraries Vol.11,no.3:27-38.

Allen, T.J. 1977. Managing the flow of technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Allison, P.D. and J.S. Long. 1990. Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, Vol.55: 469-478.

Allison, P.D. and J.A. Stewart. 1974. Productivity among scientists: evidence for accumulative advantage. American Sociological Review, Vol.39: 596-606.

Anderson, R.C.; F. Narin and P. McAllister. 1978. Publication ratings versus peer ratings of universities. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, Vol.29, no. 2: 91-103.

Anthony, L.J. ; H. East and M.J. Slater. 1969. The growth of the literature of physics. Report on the Progress in Physics, Vol.3: 709-767.

Applebee, Andrelyn C.; Peter Clayton and Celina Pascoe. 1997. Australian academic use of the Internet. Internet Research, Vol. 7, no. 2: 85-94.

Arunachalam, S. and K.C. Garg. 1985. A small country in a world of big science: a preliminary bibliometric study of science in Singapore. Scientometrics, Vol.8, no.5-6: 301-313.

Ashoor, Mohammed Saleh and Abduss Sattar Chaudhry. 1993. Publication patterns of scientists working in Saudi Arabia. International Information and Library Review, Vol. 25, no. 1: 61-71.

Austin, Anne E and Roger G. Baldwin. 1992.Faculty collaboration: enhancing the quality of scholarship and teaching. Eric digest. At: http://ericae.net/db/digs/ed347958. Html. Also published as ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report no. 7. Washington, D.C. : George Washington University,School of Education and Human Services.

Avkiran, N.R. 1997. Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research. Scientometrics, Vol.39, no.2: 173-184.

Babu, A Ramesh and Y.P.Singh. 1998. Determinants of research productivity. Scientometrics, Vol. 43, no. 3 309-329.

Bane, A.F. and W.D. Milheim. 1995. Internet insights: how academics are using the Internet. Computers in Libraries, Vol.15: 32-36.

Bayer, A.E. and John C. Smart. 1988. Author collaboration styles in academic scholarship. Paper presented at an annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April New Orleans.

Bayer, A.E. and J. Folger. 1966. Some correlates of a citation measure of productivity in science. Sociology of Education, Vol.39: 381-390.

Bayer, A.E. and John C. Smart. 1991. Career publication patterns and collaborative “styles” in American science, Journal of Higher Education, Vol.62, no.6: 613

Beaver, D. de B and R. Rosen. 1978. Studies in scientific collaboration, Part I: The professional origins of scientific co-authorship, Scientometrics, Vol.1: 65-84.

Beaver, D. de B and R. Rosen. 1979a. Studies in scientific collaboration: Part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799-1830. Scientometrics, Vol.1 :133-149.

Beaver, D. de B and R. Rosen. 1979b. Studies in scientific collaboration: Part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship, Scientometrics, Vol.1:231-245.

Behymer, Charles A. 1974. Institutional and personal correlates of faculty productivity. Ph.D. dissertations, University of Michigan.

Benning, V.J. 1976. Reports, In: Use of engineering literature, ed. By K.W. Mildren. London: Butterworth: pp 62-75.

Bentley, R.J. 1990. Faculty research performance over time and its relationship to sources of grant support. Ph.D thesis, University of Michigan.

Berghe, Herman Van den, et al. 1998. Bibliometric indicators of University research performance in Flanders. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol.49, no. 1: 59-67.

Bieber, Jeffrey P. and Robert T. Blackburn. 1993. Faculty Research productivity 1972-1988: development and application of constant units of measure. Research in Higher Education, Vol.34, no. no. 5: 327-345.

Blackburn, R.T.; C.E. Behymer and D.E. Hal. 1978. Research notes: correlates of faculty publications. Sociology of Education, Vol. 51: 132-141.

Blume, S.S. and Ruth Sinclair. 1973. Chemists in British universities: a study of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, Vol. 38: 126-138.

Bonzi, S. 1992. Senior faculty perception of research productivity. In: Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 29. Washington, DC: Knowledge Industry Publications: 206-211.

Bordons, Maria, et al. 1996. Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, Vol. 37, no.2: 279-295.

Bottle, et al. 1994. Citation analysis and the quality of scientific productivity. Bioscience, Vol. 27, no. 1: 26-31.

Braun, T., et al. 1994. World science in the eighties, national performances in publication output and citation impact, 1985-1989, versus 1980-1984. Scientometrics, Vol.31, no. 1 : 3-30.

Braun, T.; W. Glanzel and A. Schubert. 1990. Publication productivity: from frequency distribution to scientometric indicators. Journal of Information Science, Vol.16: 37-44.

Brown, J.M. 1994. The global computer network: indications of its use worldwide. International Information & Library Review, Vol. 26:51-65.

Bruce, H. 1994. Internet services and acaemic work: an Australian perspective. Internet Research, Vol.4, no.2: 24-34.

Bruce, H. 1995. Internet and academic teaching in Australia. Education for Information, Vol.13: 177-191.

Budd, Hohn M. 1995. Faculty publishing productivity: an institutional analysis and comparison with library and other measures. College and Research Libraries, Vol. 56, no.6: 547-554.

Chan, James L. 1978. Organizational concensus regarding the relative importance of research output indicators. The Accounting Review, Vol. 53, no. 2: 309-323.

Chase, Janet M. 1970 Normative criteria for scientific publication, American Sociologists, Vol.25: 262-265.

Chu, H. 1994. E-mail in scientific communication. In: 15th National Online Meeting: Proceedings – 1994, New York, May 10-12, 1994. Medford, NJ: Learned Information.

Clark, K.E. 1957. America’s psychologists: a survey of growing profession. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Clark, K.E. and Joni Gomez. 1990. Faculty use of databases at Texas A & M University, RQ, Vol. 29: 230-238.

Clarke, B.L. 1964. Multiple authorship trends in scientific papers. Science, Vol.143: 822.

Cohen, Joel. 1996. Computer mediated communication and publication productivity among faculty. Internet Research, Vol.6, no. 2/3:41-63.

Cole, S. 1989. Citation and the evaluation of individual scientists. TIBS, Vol.14: 9-13.

Cole, S. and J.R. Cole. 1967. Scientific output and recognition: a study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, Vol.32:377-390.

Cox, Lawrence M. 1980. Scientific productivity: a critical test of several hypotheses. Ph.D dissertation, Southern Illinois University.

Cozens, S. 1995.US research assessment: recent developments. Scientometrics, Vol. 34, no.3: 351-362.

Crase, D. & F.D. Rosato.1992. Single versus multiple authorship in professional journals. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dancing, Vol. 63, no.7:28-31.

Crawford, Susan; Barbara Halbrook and Simon Igielnik. 1986. Testing the use of a Medical Centre-wide online current awareness service: BAC TM /Current contents, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science.

Creamer, Elizabeth G. 1999. Knowledge production, publication productivity and intimate partnerships. Journal of Higher Education, Vol.70, no.3: 262-277.

Creswell, John W. 1985. Faculty research performance: lessons from the sciences and the social sciences. Washington : ERIC (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, no.4)

Crow, G.M., L. Levine and N. Nager. 1992. Are three heads better than one? Reflections on doing collaborative interdisciplinary research. American Educational Research Journal, Vol.29, no. 4: 737-753.

Curtis, Karen L; Ann C. Weller and Julie M. Hurd. 1997. Information-seeking behaviour of health sciences faculty: the impact of the new information technologies. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 85, no. 4: 402-410.

David, H.G. ; L. Piip and A.R. Haly. 1981. The examination of research trends by analysis of publication numbers. Journal of Information Science, Vol. 3: 283-288.

Dobrov, G.M. and R.R.Kochcherovers. 1979. Scientific communication and scientific productivity Nauchno Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya Ser, Vol.1,no.11:1-6.

Drott, M. Carl. 1995. Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science Vol.46, no. 4: 299-305.

Finkensteadt, T and M. Fries. 1978. Zur forschungsmessung in den geisteswissenschaften.Ad Acta, 3:110-164. In: Daniel, H.D. and Fisch, R. (1990). Research performance in the German University Sector, Scientometrics

Vol. 19, no. 4-5: 349-361.

Folger, Anne and Gerald Gordon. 1962. Scientific accomplishment and social organization: a review of the literature. The American Behavioral Scientists, Vol.6: 51-58.

Fonseca, Lucia, et al. 1997 The importance of human relationships in scientific productivity: Scientometrics, Vol.39, no. 2 159-171.

Fox, M. F. and C.A. Faver. 1984. Independence and cooperation in research: the motivation and costs of collaborations. Journal of Higher Education., Vol.55:347-

359.

Fox, Mary Frank. 1983. Publication productivity among scientists: a critical review. Social Studies of Science, Vol.13: 285-305.

Gallant, Jonathan and J.W. Prothero. 1972. Weight watching at the university: the consequences of growth. Science, Vol.175: 381-388.

Garfield, E. 1970. Citation indexing for studying science. Nature, Vol.227: 669-671.

Garfield, E. 1979. Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics Vol.1, no. 4:359-375.

Garvey, W.D. 1979. Communication: the essence of science. Oxford: Pergamon.

Gillett, R. 1989. Research performance indicators based on peer review: a critical analysis. Higher Education Quarterly, Vol. 43, no. 1: 20-38.

Gillett, R. 1991. Pitfalls in assessing research performance by grant income. Scientometrics, Vol.22, no.2: 253-263.

Glenn, Norval D. and Wayne Villemez. 1970. The productivity of sociologists at 45 American universities. American Sociologists, Vol.5: 244-251.

Gordon, M.D. and Presser S. 1980.A critical assessment of inferred relations between multiple authorship, scientific collaboration, the production of papers and their acceptance for publications, Scientometrics, Vol.2: 193.

Grynspan, D and L. De Meis. 1990. The concept of creativity among biochemists. Biomedical Education, Vol.18: 182-188.

Gupta, D.K. 1986. Collaboration in research output: a review and case study of collaborative trends of entomological research in Nigeria, 1900-1973. International Information, Communications and Education, Vol.5: 57.

Gupta, D.K. 1993. Collaborative research trend in exploration geophysics. Scientometrics, Vol.28, no.3: 287-296.

Hagstrom, W.O. 1971. Inputs, outputs, and the prestige of university sciencedepartments. Sociology of Education, Vol.44: 375-397.

Hammel, Eugene. 1980. Report of the task force on faculty renewal. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California-Berkeley: 5.

Hardy, Andrew P. 1982. The selection of channels when seeking information: cost /benefit vs least-effort, Information Processing & Management, Vol.18, no. 6:289-293.

Hare, Paul and Geoffrey Wyatt. 1988. Modeling the determination of research output in British universities. Research Policy, Vol.17: 315-328.

Harmon, Lindsey R. 1963. The development of a criterion of scientific competence, In: Calvin W. Taylor and Frank Barron (eds). Scientific creativity: its recognition and development, New York : Wiley: 44-52.

Harnett, R.T,; M.J. Clark, and L. Baird 1978. Reputational ratings of doctoral people. Science, Vol.199: 1310-1314.

Harris, G.T. 1989. Research Output in Australian university research centres in economics. Higher Education, Vol.18: 397-409.

Hart, R. et al. 1990. Funded and non-funded research – Characteristics of authorship and patterns of collaboration in the 1986 library and information science literatures. Library and Information Science Research, Vol.12:71-86.

Hartmann, I. and F. Neihardt. 1990. Peer review at the Deutsche Forschungsge Meinschaft, Scientometrics, Vol.19, no.5-6: 419-425.

Heffner, A.G. 1981. Funded research, multiple authorship and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines. Scientometrics, Vol.39, no.1: 5-12.

Herbstein, F.H. 1993. Measuring “publication output” and “publication impact” of faculty members of a university chemistry department. Scientometrics, Vol. 28,

no. 3: 349-373.

.

Herner, S. 1954. Information gathering habits of workers in pure and applied science. Industrial Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 46, no.1: 228-236.

Herring, Conyers 1968. Critical reviews: the user’s point of view, Journal of Chemical Documentation, Vol.8, no.2: 232-236.

Hesse, B.W.; L.S. Sproull; S.B. Kielser and J.P. Walsh. 1993. Returns to science: computer networks in oceanography. Communication of the ACM, Vol.36,no.8:90-101.

Hicks, D. and J. Skea. 1989. Is big really better? Physics World, Vol. 2, no.12: 31-34.

Hurd, Julie M.; Ann C. Weller and Karen L. Curtis. 1992. Information seeking behaviour of faculty: use of indexes and abstracts by scientists and engineers. Proceedings of the Americam Society of Information Science, Annual Meeting, Vol. 29: 136-143.

Indonesia. Departmen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 1970. Kriteria pengangkatan dalam Jabatan Akademia serta prosedur pengangkatan dalam jbatan dan kenaikan pangkat tenaga edukatif perguruan tinggi dalam lingkungan departmen pendidikan dan kebudayaan. Lampiran II. Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan dan kebudayaan no: 79/1970 29 April 1970.

Irvin, John. and B.R. Martin. 1985. Basic research in the East and West: a comparison of the scientific performance of high energy physics accelerators. Social Studies of Sciences, Vol.15: 293-341.

Irvine, John. 1989. Evaluation of scientific institutions: lessons from a bibliometric study of UK technical universities. In: The evaluation on scientific research. Chichester: John Wiley.

Irving, John and B.R. Martin. 1983. Assessing basic research: the case of the Isaac Newton Telescope, Social Studies of Science, Vol.13: 49-86.

Johnes, Geraint. 1988. Determinants of research output in economics departments in British universities. Research Policy, Vol.17: 171-178.

Johnston, R. 1994. Effects of resource concentration on research performance. Higher Education, Vol.28: 25-37.

Jones, Lyle V. 1980. The assessment of scholarship, In: Edward H. Loveland (ed). Measuring the hard-to-measure, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 1-20.

Kaminer, Noam and Yale M. Braunstein. 1998. Bibliometric analysis of the impact of the Internet use on scholarly productivity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol.49, no.8: 720-730.

Kaufman, H. G. 1963. Factors related to the use of technical information in engineering problem solving. Brooklyn: Polytechnic Institute of New york.

Koenig, M.E.D. 1982. Determinants of expert judgement of research performance.Scientometrics, Vol.4, no.5: 361-378.

Korevaar, J.C. and H.F. Moed. 1996. Validation of Bibliometric indicators in the field of mathematics. Scientometrics, Vol.37, no.1: 117-130.

Kostoff, R.N. 1995. The handbook of research impact assessment .5th ed. DTIC Report Number ADA296021.

Kremer, J.M. 1980. Information flow among engineers in a design company. Ph.D thesis, University of Illinois. UMI 80-17965.

Kruytbosch, Carlos E. 1989. The role and effectiveness of peer review, In: The evaluations of scientific research. Chichester: John Wiley: 69-85.

Lawani, S.M. 1986. Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics, Vol.9,no.1-2:13-25.

Lawani, S.M.and A.E. Bayer. 1983. Validity of citation criteria for assissing the influence of scientific publications: new evidence with peer assessment. Journal of the American Society of information Science, Vol.34:59-74.

Lazinger, Susan S.; Judith Barllan and Bluma C. Peritz. 1997. Internet use by faculty members in various disciplines: a comparative case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 48, no.6: 508-518.

Liebert, Roland J. 1977. Research-grant getting and productivity among scholars. Journal of Higher Education, Vol.48:164-192.

Liebscher, P.; E.G. Abel and D.W. Denman. 1997. Factors that influence the use of electronic networks services by science and engineering faculty in small universities and colleges. Part II preliminary use indicators, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol.48:496-507.

Lightfield, E. Timothy. 1971. Output and recognition of sociologists. The American Sociologists, Vol.6: 128-133.

Lindsay, D. 1978. The scientific publications system in social sciences. San Francisco: Josey Bass.

Lindsay, D. 1980. Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: the problem of multiple authorship. Social Studies of Science,Vol.10: 145-162.

Linsky, A.S. and M.A. Strauss. 1975. Student evaluation, research productivity and eminence of college faculty. Journal of higher Education, Vol.46: 89-102.

Lodahl, J.B. and G. Gordon. 1972. The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. American Sociological Review

Vol. 37: 57-72.

Lofthouse, Stephen. 1974. Thoughts on “publish or perish”. Higher Education, Vol.2: 59-80.

Lotka, Alfred J. 1926. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, Vol.16, no.12: 317-322.

Luukkonen, T. 1992. Is scientists’ publishing behaviour reward-seeking? Scientometrics, Vol.24, no.2: 297-319.

Luukkonen, T.; O. Persson.and G. Sivertsen. 1992. Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration, Science, Technology and Human Values

Vol.17: 101-126.

Macroberts, Michael H. and Barbara R. Macroberts. 1982. A re-evaluation of Lotka’s law of scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, Vol.12: 443-450.

Martin, B.R. 1996. The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics, Vol.36, no.3: 343-362.

Martin, B.R. and J. Irvine. 1981. Internal criteria for scientific choice: an evaluation of research in high-energy physics using electron accelerators, Minerva, Vol.19: 408-432.

Martin, B.R. and J. Irvine. 1983. Assessing basic research: some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research Policy, Vol.12: 61-90.

McAllister, P.R. and D.A. Wagner. 1981. Relationship between R & D expenditures and publi-cation output for US colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education, Vol.15:3-29.

McClure, C.R. et al. 1996. The national research and education network: research and policy perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex,:ch.6.

Meadows, A.J. 1974. Communication in science. London: Butterworth.

Melin, G. and O. Persson. 1996. Studying research collaboration using coauthorships. Scientometrics, Vol.36, no.3 363-377.

Melin, G. and O. Persson. 1998. Hotel cosmopolitan: a bibliometric study of collaboration at some European universities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol.49, no.1: 43-48.

Melin, G. 1996. The networking university – a study of a Swedish university using institutional co-authorship as an indicator. Scientometrics, Vol.35: 15-31.

Meltzer, Bernard N. 1949. The productivity of social scientists. American Journal of Sociology: Vol.25-29.

Meltzer, Leo. 1956. Scientific productivity in organizational settings. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 12: 32-40.

Meneghini, R. 1996. The key role of collaborative work in the growth of Brazilian science in the last ten years. Scientometrics, Vol.35, no.3: 367-373.

Milne, P.A. 1992. Scholarly communication: poised for change at ANU In: Libraries, the heart of the matter. Proceedings of the Australian Library and Information Association 2nd Biennial Conference, Deakin, ACT: 245-250.

Moed, H.F. 1989. The use of bibliometric indicators for the assessment of research performance in natural and life sciences. Leiden: DSWO Press.

Moed, H.F. and A.F.J.van Raan. 1988. Indicators of research performance: applications in university research policy. In: A.F.J. an Raan (ed). Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology. Amsterdam: North-Holland:177-192.

Moed, H.F. et al. 1983. On the measurement of research performance: the use of bibliometric indicators. Leiden: Sciences Studies Unit, University of Leiden.

Moed, H.F. et al. 1985a. A comparative study of bibliometric past performnce analysis and peer judgement. Scientometrics, Vol.8: 149-159.

Moed, H.F. et al. 1985b. The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy, Vol.14:131-149.

Moed, H.F. et al. 1991. International scientific cooperation and awareness within the European Community: Problems and perspectives. Scientometrics, Vol.21: 291-311.

Myers, R.C. 1970. Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology. American Psychologist, Vol.25, no.11: 1041-1048.

Narin, F. 1976. Evaluative bibliometrics: the use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

Narin, F.; K. Stevens and E.S. Whitlow. 1991. Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, Vol.21: 313-323.

Nederhof, A.J. and A.F.J. van Raan. 1993a. A bibliometric analysis of six economics research groups: a comparison with peer review, Research Policy Vol.22: 353-365.

Nederhof, A.J. et al. 1993b. Research performance indicators for university departments: a study of an agricultural university. Scientometrics, Vol.27, no. 2:157-178.

Oromaner, M. 1975. Collaboration and impact: the career of multi-authored publications. Social Science Information, Vol.14: 147-155

.

Orr, R.H. 1970. The scientist as an information processor: a conceptual model illustrated with data on variable related to library utilization. In: Communication among scientists and engineers, edited by C.E. Nelson and

D.K. Pollack. Lexington, Heath: Lexington Mass.

Pao, Miranda Lee. 1995. Global and local collaborators: a study of scientific collaboration, Information Processing & Management Vol. 28, no.1: 99-109.

Patel, N. 1972. Collaboration in the professional growth of American sociology.Social Science Information, Vol.12, no.6: 77-92, 80.

Pelz, Donald C and Frank M. Andrews. 1966. Scientists in organizations: productive climates for research and development. New York: John Wiley.

Peritz, Bluma C. 1983. A note on “scholarliness” nd “impact”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol.34, no.5: 360-362.

Persson, O. et al, 1997. Research collaboration at Nordic Universities, Scientometrics, Vol.39, no.2: 209-223.

Pinelli et al. 1993. The information seeking behaviour of engineers. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, Vol.52, sup.15: 167-201.

Plaza, L.M.; M.J. Martin and J. Rey. 1996. Scientific relations between Spain and Central Eastern European countries for the period 1982-1992. Scientometrics Vol.37, no.1: 131-142.

Poland, Jean A. 1993. Informal communication among scientists and engineers. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, Vol. 53: 171-181.

Presser, S. 1980. Collaboration and the quality of research. Social studies of Science, Vol.10: 95.

Price, D.J. De Solla. 1963. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.

Price, D.J. De Solla and D. De B. Beaver. 1966. Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologists Vol.21: 1011.

Prpic, Katarina. 1996a. Characteristics and determinants of eminent scientist’ productivity. Scientometrics, Vol.36: 185-206.

Prpic, Katarina. 1996b. Scientific fields and eminent scientists’ productivity patterns and factors. Scientometrics, Vol.37, no.3: 445-471.

Qin, Jian; F.W. Lancaster and Bryce Allen. 1997. Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Vol. 48, no.10: 893-916.

Raan, A.F.J van. 1989. Evaluation of research groups. In: The evaluation of scientific research. Chichester: John Wiley.

Ramsden, P. 1994. Describing and explaining research productivity. Higher Education, Vol.28: 207-226.

Reskin, Barbara F. 1977. Scientific productivity and the reward structure of science. American Sociological Review, Vol.42:491-504.

Rogers, E.M. 1986. Communication technology: the new media in society. New York: Free Press.

Roose, Kenneth D and Charles J. Anderson. 1970. A rating of graduate programs. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

Rosenbloom, R.S. and F.W. Wolek. 1970. Technology and information transfer: a survey of practice in chemistry, Boston: Harvard University.

Rushton, J.P. and S. Meltzer. 1981. Research productivity, university revenue and scholarly impact (citations) of 169 British, Canadian and United States Universities (1977). Scientometrics, Vol.3: 275-303.

Ruth, S. and R. Gouet. 1993. Must invisible colleges be invisible? An approach to examining large communities of network users. Internet Research. Vol.31, no.1: 36-53.

Salisbury, G.W. 1980. Research productivity of the state agricultural experiment station system: measured by scientific publication output. Bulletin 762. College

of Agriculture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Schaefermeyer, M.J. and E.H. Sewell. 1988. Communicating by electronic mail. American Behavioural Scientists. Vol.32, no.2: 112-123.

Schwartz, Charles. 1991. Research productivity and publication output: an interdisciplinary analysis. College & Research Libraries Vol.52, no.2: 414-424.

Sen, B.K. 1997. Mega-authorship from a bibliometric point of view. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, Vol.2, no.2: 9-18.

Shuchman, H.I. 1981. Information transfer in engineering. Glastonbury, CT: The Futures Group.

Smart, John C. and Alan E. Bayer. 1986. Author collaboration and impact: a note on citation rates of single and multiple authored articles, Scientometrics,

Vol.10: 297-305.

Sonnert, Gerhard. 1995. What makes a good scientists?: determinants of peer evaluation among biologists, Social Studies of Science, Vol.25: 35-55.

Spears, R and M. Lea. 1994. Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, Vol.21: 427-459.

Srichandra,. 1970. Scientists: a socio-psychological study. New Delhi: Oxford. Stankiewicz, R. 1976. Research groups and the academic science organization, Sociologisk Forskning, Vol. 13, no.2.

Styvendaele, B.J.H.Van. 1977. University scientists as seekers of information: sources of references to periodical literature. Journal of Librarianship, Vol.9,

no.4: 270-277.

Subramaniam, K.1981a. Research productivity and breadth of interest of interest of computer science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science Vol.35: 369-371.

Subramaniam, K. 1981b. Scientific and technical resources. New York: Marcel Dekker.

Subramaniam, K. 1983. Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review. Journal of Information Science, Vol.6: 33-38.

Taylor, R.S. 1986. Value added processes in information systems. Norwood, NJ.: Ablex Press.

Velho, L and J. Krige. 1984. Publication and citation practices of Brazilian agricultural scientists. Social Studies of Science, Vol.14: 45-62.

Vieira, Dorice and Richard Faraino. 1997. Analyzing the research record of an institution’s list of faculty publication, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 85, no.2: 154-157.

Wade, N. 1975. Citation analysis: a new tool for science administrators, Science Vol.188: 429-432.

Wakefield, R.A. 1978. Focus on Washington, Grants Magazine, Vol.1, no.2: 149-153.

Walker, R.D. and C.D. Hurt. 1990. Scientific and technical literature: an introduction to forms of communication. Chicago: American Library Association: 46-47.

Wanner, Richard A; Lionel S. Lewis and David I. Gregorio. 1981. Research productivity in academia: a comparative study of the science, social sciences, and humanities. Sociology of Education, Vol.54: 238-253.

Waworuntu, Bob. 1986a. Productivity of faculty in Indonesian Public Higher Education. Ph. D. thesis, State University of New York at Albany. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms International.

Waworuntu, Bob. 1986b. The research productivity of faculty in Indonesian Public Higher Education. Ph.D thesis. State University of New York at Albany.

White, C.M. 1995. Uses and impacts of computer mediated communication: a survey of faculty in mass communication and related disciplines. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens.

White, Marilyn Domas. 1994.Communications behaviour of academic economists. Ph.D. thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ann Arbor: UMI Dissertation Service.

Wood, Fred B.; Karen T. Wallingford, and Elliot R. Siegal. 1997. Transitioning to the Internet: results of a National Library. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, Vol.85, no.4: 331-340.

Woods, Fiona. 1990. Factors influencing research performance of university academic staff. Higher Education, Vol.19: 81-100.

Zachos, G. 1989. Bibliometric indicator in basic research evaluation, with a comparative assessment of two university departments in Greece. M.Sc dissertation. Loughborough: Loughborough University of Technology.

Zachos, G. 1991. Research output evaluation of two university departments in Greece with the use of bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, Vol.21 no.2: 195-221.

Zainab A.N. 1999. Personal, academic and departmental correlates of research productivity: a review of literature. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, vol.4, no.2, December: 73-110.

Zhang, Haiqi. 1995. Biomedical articles from China published in foreign periodicals based on Medline database. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 14:234-240. (In Chinese).

Zhang, Haiqi. 1996. Research performance in key medical universities in China observed from the scientific productivity. Scientometrics. Vol.37, no.1: 177-190.

Zhang, Wenxian. 1998. Analyzing faculty & staff’s information needs and use of electronic technologies: a liberal Arts College’s perspective. Journal of Educational Media & Library Science, Vol.35, no.3: 218-241.

Zhu, Jialong; A.J. Meadows and G. Mason. 1991. Citations and departmental research ratings, Scientometrics, Vol. 21, no.2: 171-179.

Zuckerman, Harriet. 1977. Scientific elite: nobel laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.