Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Investigation of the Image Quality of Plain Abdominal Radiographs in Three Nigerian Hospitals

Egbe, N.O., and Eduwem, D.U., and Ikamaise, V.C., (2007) Investigation of the Image Quality of Plain Abdominal Radiographs in Three Nigerian Hospitals. Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal, 3 (4).

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
161Kb

Official URL: http://www.biij.org/2007/4/e39/e39.pdf

Affiliations

University of Calabar, Nigeria. College of Medical Sciences, Dept. of Radiography
University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. Dept. of Radiology

Abstract

Purpose: A retrospective study of image quality of abdominal radiographs to establish a baseline for the development of quality control programmes in Nigerian hospitals. Materials and Method: Subjective evaluation of 210 plain abdominal radiographs produced between 2002 and 2004, and drawn from the film libraries of the hospitals, a teaching hospital (TH), a specialist hospital (SH) and a private clinic (PC) was carried out by four radiographers and three radiologists, using basic radiographic criteria such as collimation, optical film density, positioning, use of and correct placement of gonad shields, as well as criteria for image quality defined by the Commission for European Communities. Films were assessed as adequate, not adequate and poor for the radiographic/technical parameters, and scored 1 to 4 in an ascending order of performance for image quality. They were then ranked in order of overall quality. Pooled results were studied by method of analysis of means. Results: Results generally showed good radiographic image performance for pooled data. Respective hospital performance was best for TH for most of the data assessed. Based on individual parameters, the study found 6.61% of the total number of films ‘rejectable’. Of the 210 radiographs studied, 107 satisfied all the criteria for good quality images.
Conclusion: Findings underscore the need for implementing quality control programmes using the results of this study as a baseline.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Plain Abdominal Radiographs, Image Quality, Quality Control, Films, Calabar
Subjects:R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:4724

1. European Commission. European Guideleines on Quality criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images. Luxembourg, 1996; EUR 16260 EN.

2. International Atomic Energy Agency. Optimization of the Radiological Protection of patients undergoing radiography, fluoroscopy and computed tomography. Final report of a coordinated research project in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe. 2004; IAEA-TECDOC-1423.

3. Wadman M, Syk I, Elmstahl B et al. Abdominal plain film findings in acute ischemic bowel disease differ with age. Acta Radiol 2006; 47(3):238-43.

4. Martin CJ, Sharp PF, Sutton DG. Measurement of image quality in diagnostic radiology. Appl Radiat Isot 1999; 50(1):21-38.

5. Stieve FE, Hagemann G, Stender H-S. Relationship between Medical Requirements and Technical Parameters of Good Imaging Performance and Acceptable Dose. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 1993; 49(1):3-18.

6. Pina DR, Duarte SB, Ghilardi Netto T et al. Optimization of standard patient radiographic images for chest, skull and pelvis exams in conventional x-ray equipment. Phys Med Biol 2004; 49(14):N215-26.

7. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation SaEoIR. Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. 2000.

8. Ogundare FO, Uche CZ, Balogun FA. Radiological parameters and radiation doses of patients undergoing abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine X-ray examinations in three Nigerian hospitals. Br J Radiol 2004; 77(923):934-40.

9. Ogundare FO, Ajibola CL, Balogun FA. Survey of radiological techniques and doses of children undergoing some common x-ray examinations in three hospitals in Nigeria. Med Phys 2004; 31(3):521-4.

10. Lau S, Ng KH, Abdullah BJJ. Viewing Conditions in Diagnostic Imaging: A survey of selected Malaysian Hospitals. JHK Coll Radiol 2001; 4:264-7.

11. International Standards Organization. Photography-Density Measurements. Part 3. Geneva: ISO, 1983; ISO 5.

12. Jessen KA. Balancing image quality and dose in diagnostic quality. Eur Radiol Syllabus 2004; 14:9-18.

13. Bassey CE, Ojo OO, Akpabio I. Repeat profile in an X-ray department. J Radiol Prot 1991; 11:179-83.

14. Schandorf C, Tetteh GK. Analysis of the status of X-ray diagnosis in Ghana. Br J Radiol 1998; 71(850):1040-8.

15. Nigerian Nuclear Regulatory Authority. Nigerian Radiation Safety Regulations for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Practice. 2003.

Repository Staff Only: item control page