Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Optimisation in Fluoroscopy

Axelsson, B., (2007) Optimisation in Fluoroscopy. Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal, 3 (2). e47.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
151Kb

Official URL: http://www.biij.org/2007/2/e47/e47.pdf

Affiliations

Växjö Central Hospital, Sweden, Dept. of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Optimisation of radiation protection in fluoroscopy is important since the procedure could lead to relatively high absorbed doses both in patients and personnel resulting in acute radiation injury. Optimisation procedures include adjustment of the fluoroscopy equipment such as exposure factors as well as proper use of automatic brightness control and pulsed fluoroscopy. It is also important to gain the benefits of image processing and the higher sensitivity of flat panel detectors as compared to image intensifier-TV systems. Proper positioning of the patient with respect to detector and X-ray tube is of fundamental importance to image quality and radiation dose to the patient. Both image quality and radiation dose are also affected by the methodology used with parameters such as magnification factor, increased filtration, use of last-image-hold and the use of a grid. There is a direct relation between patient dose and the absorbed dose to the personnel since this is mostly due to scattered radiation from the patient. If the correct methodology and the correct radiation protection devices are used, the absorbed dose to the personnel could be minimised to acceptable levels even for those working with complex procedures. In order to have an organised review of all aspects of optimisation, it is recommendable to have an active quality system at the department. This system should define responsibilities and tasks for persons involved.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Radiation protection, fluoroscopy, patient dose, dose reduction
Subjects:R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:4941

1. Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, van Vliet M. Assessment of effective dose in paediatric radiology: a survey at 14 dutch hospitals. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2000; 90:135-40.

2. Suleiman OH, Conway BJ, Quinn P et al. Nationwide survey of fluoroscopy: radiation dose and image quality. Radiology 1997; 203(2):471-6.

3. Kuon E, Glaser C, Dahm JB. Effective techniques for reduction of radiation dosage to patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures. Br J Radiol 2003; 76(906):406-13.

4. Hwang E, Gaxiola E, Vlietstra RE et al. Real-time measurement of skin radiation during cardiac catheterization. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998; 43(4):367-70; discussion 371.

5. Huda W, Peters KR. Radiation-induced temporary epilation after a neuroradiologically guided embolization procedure. Radiology 1994; 193(3):642-4.

6. Nahass GT, Cornelius L. Fluoroscopy-induced radiodermatitis after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93(9):1546-9.

7. Vano E, Gonzalez L, Beneytez F et al. Lens injuries induced by occupational exposure in non-optimized interventional radiology laboratories. Br J Radiol 1998; 71(847):728-33.

8. Smiddy PF, Quinn AD, Freyne PJ et al. Dose reduction in double contrast barium enema by use of low fluoroscopic current. Br J Radiol 1996; 69(825):852-4.

9. Brown PH, Thomas RD, Silberberg PJ et al. Optimization of a fluoroscope to reduce radiation exposure in pediatric imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2000; 30(4):229-35.

10. Tapiovaara MJ, Sandborg M, Dance DR. A search for improved technique factors in paediatric fluoroscopy. Phys Med Biol 1999; 44(2):537-59.

11. Hernandez RJ, Goodsitt MM. Reduction of radiation dose in pediatric patients using pulsed fluoroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167(5):1247-53.

12. Vano E, Geiger B, Schreiner A et al. Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50(23):5731-42.

13. Trianni A, Bernardi G, Padovani R. Are new technologies always reducing patient doses in cardiac procedures? Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005; 117(1-3):97-101.

14. Geijer H, Beckman KW, Andersson T et al. Radiation dose optimization in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). I. Experimental studies. Eur Radiol 2002; 12(10):2571-81.

15. Axelsson B, Boden K, Fransson SG et al. A comparison of analogue and digital techniques in upper gastrointestinal examinations: absorbed dose and diagnostic quality of the images. Eur Radiol 2000; 10(8):1351-4.

16. Hansson B, Finnbogason T, Schuwert P et al. Added copper filtration in digital paediatric double-contrast colon examinations: effects on radiation dose and image quality. Eur Radiol 1997; 7(7):1117-22.

17. Fenner JW, Morrison GD, Kerry J et al. A practical demonstration of improved technique factors in paediatric fluoroscopy. Br J Radiol 2002; 75(895):596-602.

18. Soderman M, Hansson B, Axelsson B. Radiation dose and image quality in neuroangiography: effects of increased tube voltage, added x-ray filtration and antiscatter grid removal. Interv Neurorad 1998; 4:199-207.

19. Marshall NW, Faulkner K. Optimization of personnel shielding in interventional radiology. Faulkner K, Teunen D. Radiation Protection in Interventional Radiology. London, UK: Brit Inst of Radiol, 1995.

20. Axelsson B, Cederlund T, Svane B. Evaluation of exposure to personnel in cardiac angiography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 1995; 57:433-6.

Repository Staff Only: item control page