Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Aplikasi Pembelajaran Secara-konstruktivisme dalam Pengajaran Karangan-berpandu [Application of constructivism in learning and teaching guided composition]

Abdul Jalil Othman, and Bahtiar Omar, (2005) Aplikasi Pembelajaran Secara-konstruktivisme dalam Pengajaran Karangan-berpandu [Application of constructivism in learning and teaching guided composition]. Masalah Pendidikan, 28 . pp. 221-232. ISSN 0126-5024

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
186Kb

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Education. Dept. of Educational Linguistic and Literacy.

Abstract

Constructivism is based on the premise that learners actively contruct their own learning. This article explores the use of constructivism in guided essay writing. It compares the traditional method of teaching guided writing with the constructivist approach. The changing roles of students and teachers under constructivism are discussed.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:constructivism learning and teaching
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:4999

1. Abdul Jalil Othman (1997). Kesan teknik penggabungan ayat terhadap pertautan dalam karangan Bahasa Melayu pelajar Tingkatan 1. Disertasi Sarjana, Fakulti Pendidikan, Umversiti Malaya.

2. Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune.

3. Briner, M. (2005). [Atas Talian] http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itcdata/constructivism.html

4. Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision And Curriculum Development (ASCD).

5. Brooks, M. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). The courage to be constructivist. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 38-43.

6. Bruner, J. (2005). Constructivist theory. [Atas talian] http://tip.psychology.org/bruner.html

7. Bruner, J. S, Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1967). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.

8. Cook-Gumprez, J. (Ed.). (1986). The social construction of literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.

9. Gagne, R. M. (1965). The learning of concepts. The School Review, 73(3), 187-196.

10. Koh Boh Boon (1989). Beberapa aspek penting dalam pengajaran karangan bergambar. Dlm. Koh Boh Boon. Perspektif-perspektzf dalam pengajaran Bahasa Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: DBP.

11. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001a). Pembelajaran secara konstruktivisme. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.

12. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001b). Sukatan pelajaran Bahasa Melayu KBSM. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.

13. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2004). Format pentaksiran Bahasa Melayu SPM. Kuala Lumpur: Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia.

14. Lindgren, H. C. (1985). Educational psychology in the classroom (7th ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

15. Mahzan Arshad (2003). Pendidikan literasi Bahasa Melayu: Satu pendekatan bersepadu. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan.

16. Marohaini Yusof, Mahzan Arshad, & Abdul Jalil Othman (2004). Buku teks Bahasa Melayu Tingkatan 4. Kuala Lumpur: DBP.

17. McCrimmon, J. (1980). Writing with a purpose. Boston, MA: Houghton.

18. Nik Azis Nik Pa (1999). Pendekatan konstruktivisme radikal dalam pendidikan matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

19. Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. New York: Columbia UP.

20. Sharifah Norul Akmar Syed Zamri (2004). Konstruktivisme radikal dan temuduga klinikal dalam penyelidikan pendidikan Matematik. Dlm. Marohaini Yusof (Ed.), Penyelidikan kualitatif: Pengalaman kerja lapangan kajian. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

21. Taba, H. (1966). Teaching strategies and cognitive functioning in elementary school children (Cooperative Research Project 2404). San Francisco, CA: San Francisco State University.

22. von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer.

23. Wells, G. (1990). Creating the conditions to encourage literate thinking. Educational Leadership, 47(6), 13-17.

Repository Staff Only: item control page