Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

University Teachers And Students’ Perceptions Of ELT Methodologies And Their Effectiveness

Wilhelm, Kim Hughes, and Chen, Betty Pei, (2008) University Teachers And Students’ Perceptions Of ELT Methodologies And Their Effectiveness. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 18 (2). pp. 79-102. ISSN 1675-8021

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
139Kb

Affiliations

University of Macau, China
University of Shenzhen, China

Abstract

Since the mid 1970’s, a number of Asian countries have been concerned with economic reform and a firmer position in the global market. As such, a great deal of attention has been devoted to the improvement of English language teaching and learning, especially at the tertiary level. The purpose of this study was to investigate English language teaching and learning at three universities located on China’s mainland so as to identify issues worthy of more in-depth investigation. Perceptions sought from 25 English teachers and 312 English majors included: degree of satisfaction with materials and facilities; importance of English skill areas; effectiveness of teaching methods used; and factors contributing to effective language learning. Questionnaire data also included teacher/student talk time and how classes were typically structured. In addition, teachers were asked to give their views of their roles in the class and the importance of various assessment factors. Students were asked to indicate their perceptions for learning English, their perceived responsibilities in class, and their mastery of various English skills. One issue which emerged was the perception by students that they have little opportunity to practise English in the class. Teachers dominate “talk time” and this, combined with a lack of group work, indicate that little actual change has taken place regarding traditional teacher and learner roles in the classroom. Both groups were dissatisfied with textbooks and felt a lack of involvement when selecting materials or deciding syllabi. An interesting finding was the emphasis students placed on the importance of the social university environment for their success in English.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:ELT in Asia, curricular reform, methodology, perceptions of students, perceptions of teachers.
Subjects:P Language and Literature
L Education
ID Code:5072

Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Brumfit, C., & Johnson. K. (2000). The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). Globalization, methods and practise in periphery classrooms. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 134-150). London: Routledge.

Dzau, Y. F. (1990). English in China. Hong Kong: API Press Ltd.

Hamid, R. (2005). Curriculum reform to improve educational outcomes and future opportunities for all students. Paper presented at the B-Span World Bank Institute videoconference. Retrieved November 8, 2007 from http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/122745/700%5Frohani%5Fhamid.ppt

Howatt. A. P. R. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jarvis, H., & Atsilarat, S. (2004). Shifting paradigms: from a communicative to a context-based approach. Asian EFL Journal. December 2004. http://asian-efljournal.

com/december_04_HJ&SA.php

Ji, S. (2002). English as a global language in China. The Weekly Column, article 99.Retrieved 22 January 2003, from

http://www.eltnewsletter.com/back/May2002/art992002.htm

Kim, S. J. (2004). Coping with Cultural Obstacles to Speaking English in the Korean Secondary School Context. Asian EFL Journal. September 2004. http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/september_04_ksj.php

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537-560.

Lam, A. (2005). Language education in China: Policy and experience from 1949. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

Liao, X. (2000). How communicative language teaching became acceptable in secondary schools in China. TESOL Journal, 6(10), 12-15.

Sun, G., & Cheng, L. (2002). From context to curriculum: A case study of communicative language teaching in China. TESL Canada, 19(2), 67-86.

Wang, Z. (1999). Trends of ELT in China. Foreign Languages 6, 36-41.

Wilhelm, K. H. (1997a). Language -- not the only barrier. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching 7, 55-75.

Wilhelm, K. H. (1997b). Sometimes kicking and screaming: Language teachers-intraining react to a collaborative learning model. Modern Language Journal 81(4),527-542.

Yoon, K. (2004). CLT Theories and Practises in EFL Curricula. A Case Study of Korea. Asian EFL Journal. September 2004. http://www.asian-efljournal.com/september_04_yke.php

Yu, L. (2001). Communicative language teaching in China. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 194-198.

Xiao, A. (1998). An academic or a more practical approach. Forum, 36(2), 28.

Repository Staff Only: item control page