Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Pembentukan Kerangka Teori Sekolah Cemerlang [Developing a theoretical framework for excellent schools]

Shahril Charil Marzuki, (2004) Pembentukan Kerangka Teori Sekolah Cemerlang [Developing a theoretical framework for excellent schools]. Masalah Pendidikan, 27 . pp. 23-38. ISSN 0126-5024

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
89Kb

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Education.

Abstract

This article explores the construction of a theoretical framework of school effectiveness and leadership. School effectiveness is described as a function of four major factors: principal appropriateness, teacher preparedness, student readiness and infrasrtucture adequacy. The most ineffective schools are those where the principal is inappropriate, the teacher is unprepared to teach, the student is unready to learn and the school infrastructure is inadequate, while in the most effective schools the opposite occurs. Suggestions are given for transforming ineffective schools into effective ones.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Excellence in schools, Malaysia, quality measures
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:5084

1. Abdul Shukor Abdullah. (1991). Pengurusan organisasi: Perspektif pemikiran dan teori. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

2. Brookover, W. B., & Lezotte, L. W. (1979). Changes in school characteristics coincident with change in student achievement. East Lansing: Michigan State University, College of Urban Development.

3. Carroll, J. B. (1989). The Carroll Model: A 25 year retrospective and prospective view, Educational Researcher, 18(1), 26-31.

4. Edmonds, R. R. (1977). Search for effective schools: The identification and analysis of city schools that are instructionally effective for poor children. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

5. Edmonds, R. (1979a). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15-27.

6. Hopkins, D., Ainscow. M., & West, M. (1994). School improvement in an era of change. London: Cassell.

7. Hopkins, D., & Reynolds, D. C. (1999). Moving on and moving up: Confronting the complexities of school improvement in The Improving Schools Project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4. 23-51.

8. Hussein Mahmood. (1993). Kepemimpinan dan keberkesanan sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

9. Levine, D., & Lezotte, L. (1990). Unusually effective schools. Madison, WI: The National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.

10. Mortimore, P. (1991). Effective schools from a British perspective: Research and practice. Dalam J. Bliss & W. Firestone (Ed.), Creating effective schools. London: Prentice-Hall.

11. Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools. Kertas dibentangkan dalam Seminar Sekolah Efektif, Institut Aminuddin Baki, Genting Highlands.

12. Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis., S., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: The junior years. Somerset: Open Books.

13. Rahimah Haji Ahmad & Zulkifii A. Manaf. (1996). Towards developing a profile of effective and less effective schools. Jurnal Pendidikan, 17, 51-64.

14. Reynolds, D., Creemers, B. P. M., Hopkins, D., Stoll, L., & Bollen, R. (1996). Making good schools: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. London: Routledge.

15. Reynolds, D., Creemers, B., Nesselrodt, P. Schafter, E., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (Eds). (1994). Advances in school effectiveness research and practice. Oxford: Pergamon.

16. Rosenholtz, S. J. (1985). Effective schools: Interpreting the evidence. American Journal of Education, 93, 353-387.

17. Ruder, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., Ouston, J., & Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

18. Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling: Research, theory and practice. London: Cassell.

19. Sergiovani, T. J. (1982). Ten principles of quality leadership. Educational Leadership, 35(9), 234-245.

20. Sergiovani, T. J. (1984). Leadership and excellence in schooling. Educational Leadership, 41(5), 23-40.

21. Sharifah Md. Nor. (2000). Keberkesanan sekolah: Satu perspektif sosiologi. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.

22. Shahril@Charil Marzuki. (1997). Kajian sekolah berkesan di Malaysia: Model lima faktor. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. (Tesis kedoktoran tidak diterbitkan).

23. Slater, R. O., & Teddlie, C. (1992). Toward a theory of school effectiveness and leadership. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8(4). 247-257.

24. Slavin, R. (1997). A theory of school and classroom organization. Educational Psychologist, 22, 89-108.

25. Stoll, L., & Fink, D. C. (1996). Changing our schools. Buckingham: Open University Press.

26. Stringfield, F, & Teddlie, C. (1988). A time to summarise: The Louisiana School Effectiveness Study. Educational Leadership, 46(2), 43-49.

27. Sweeney, J. (1982). Research synthesis on effective school leadership. Educational Leadership, 39(5), 346-352.

28. Teddlie, C., Kirby, P. C., & Stringfield, S. (1989). Effective versus ineffective schools: Observable differences in the classroom. American Journal of Education, 97(3), 221-236.

29. Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, R. (2002). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer.

30. Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1985). A differential analysis of effectiveness in middle and lower socioeconomic status schools. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 20, 38-44.

31. Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools make a difference. New York: Teachers College Press.

32. Weber, G. (1971), Inner city children can be taught to read: Four successful schools. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.

33. Witte, J., & Walsh, D. (1990). A systematic test of the effective schools model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(2), 188-212.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.