Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Linguistic Pathways to the Study of Literature in the Malaysian ESL Context

Ganakumaran Subramaniam, (2003) Linguistic Pathways to the Study of Literature in the Malaysian ESL Context. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 3 (1). pp. 1-21. ISSN 1675-8021

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
102Kb

Official URL: http://www.fpbahasa.ukm.my/linguistics/Gema/GemaVol3.1.2003No2.pdf

Affiliations

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. School of Language Studies and Linguistics

Abstract

The teaching and learning of literature in English in the Malaysian English as a Second Language (ESL) context has evolved from being a core part of the English language curriculum to a point of near extinction only to re-emerge in the 21 st century in a far stronger form. Given the changed scenario of the teaching and learning of literature in Malaysia since the incorporation of literature as a compulsory and formally tested component of the Malaysian ESL syllabus for secondary schools, it is crucial that consideration be given to teaching and learning approaches. This paper proposes a pedagogical approach via language/linguistic pathways to the teaching and learning of the literature component in the ESL syllabus. The approach propagates that teaching of literature to Malaysian students begins with an introduction to and the awareness of forms and functions of the language in the literary texts. This helps create clear pathways to introduce to learners basic stylistic features in the texts and to consider their roles. Finally the linguistic pathways established through language-based and stylistic approaches may be used to develop specialised reading and interpretative techniques from personal, gender-based, cultural, national and postcolonial positions.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Learning of literature, Malaysia. English as a second language
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:510

1.Brumfit, C and Benton, M. 1993. Teaching Literature: A World Perspective. London: Macmillan.

2.Carter, R. 1982. A Note on Core Vocabulary. Nottingham Linguistic Circular. 11: 2. p. 39-50.

3.Carter, R. 1986. Linguistic Models, Language and Literariness: Study Strategies in the Teaching of Literature to Foreign Students. In C.J. Brumfit and R.A. Carter (Eds.), Literature and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4.Carter, R. 1987. Vocabulary:An applied linguistic guide. London: Allen and Unwin.

5.Carter, R. 1988. Vocabulary, Cloze and Discourse: An applied Linguistic View. In R. 6.Carter and M. McCarthy (Eds.),.Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Essex: Longman. p.161-180.

7.Carter, R. and Long, M. 1987a. The Web of Words: Exploring Literature Through Language.(students book) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

8.Carter, R. and Long, M. 1987b. The Web of Words: Exploring Literature Through Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

9.Carter, R. and Long, M. 1991. Teaching Literature. Harlow: Longman.

10.Collie,J. and Slatter,S. 1987. Literature in the Language Classroom: A Resource Book of Ideas and Activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11.Edwin, M. 1993. Teaching Literature in English in Malaysian Secondary Schools. In C. Brumfit and M. Benton (Eds.), Teaching Literature: A World Perspective. London: Macmillan .

12.Ganakumaran Subramaniam. 2002. Reading through Literature and Literature through Reading: The incorporation of a Literature Component in the Malaysian ESL Syllabus. In Maya Khemlani David & Fatimah Hashim. (Eds.), Developing Reading Skills. Sasbadi-MELTA ELT Series. Petaling Jaya:Sasbadi.

13.Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

14.Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

15.Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

16.Lakoff, R. 1972. The Pragmatics of Modality. Papers of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol. 7. p. 229-258.

17.Lazar, G. 1993. Literature and Language Teaching: A Guide for Teachers and Trainers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18.Maniam, K.S. 1993. In A Far Country. London: Skoob Books Publishing.

19.McCarthy, M. 1990. Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

20.McRae, J. 1991. Literature with a small ‘l’. London: Macmillan.

21.McRae, J. and Boardman, R. 1984. Reading Between the Lines: Integrated Language and Literature Activities (Teacher’s Book). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

22.McRae.J. and M.E. Vethamani. 1998. Now Read On. London: Routledge

23.Simpson, P. 1993. Language , Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge.

24.Widdowson, H 1975. Stylistics and the Teaching of Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Repository Staff Only: item control page