Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Interactive Whiteboard: A New Dimension in Teaching and Learning

Rafiza Abdul Razak, and Adelina Asmawi, (2004) Interactive Whiteboard: A New Dimension in Teaching and Learning. Masalah Pendidikan, 27 . pp. 213-220. ISSN 0126-5024

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
42Kb

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Education.
University of Malaya. Faculty of Education.

Abstract

Interactive board is a current teaching and learning aid used in education. This innovation has several advantages which can be applied in teaching and learning that includes collaborative learning, support interactivity, record notations, and is accessible to all. The interactive board gives a new domension to presentations in teaching and learning.

Papan Interaktif merupakan alat bantuan pengajaran dan pembelajaran yang terkini digunakan dalam pendidikan. Inovasi ini mempunyai banyak kelebihan yang boleh diaplikasikan dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Antara ciri-ciri utama papan interakfif adalah: pembelajaran kolaboratif, interaktiviti, keupayaan merakam dan boleh diakses oleh semua termasuk golongan berkeperluan khas. Papan Interaktif memberikan salu dimensi baru kepada corak persembahan dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Interactive white boards, Use of, Teaching
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:5104

1. Academic Search Elite On GALILEO. (1999). Biology comes alive at Wilson Magnet High School (1999). T H E (Technological Horizons in Education) Journal, 27(4), 110. Retrieved June 12, 2004,from http://www.galileo.peachnet.edu

2. Atkinson, E. S. (2000). An investigation into the relationship between teacher motivation and pupil motivation. Educational Psychology, 20(1), 45-57.

3. Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism, implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. pp.170-198. New York: Simon & Schuster.

4. Gellerman, E. (1994). Teleconferencing systems facilitate collaboration and distance learning. T H E (Technological Horizons in Education) Journal, 22(3).

5. Gerard, F., & Widener, J. (2000). A SMARTer way to teach foreign language: The SmartBoard interactive Whiteboard as a language learning tool. Retrieved June 6, 2004, from http://edcompass.smarttech.com/NR/rdonlyres/3CABE650-1C29-4E3A-BC21-45BB97F08B0D/0/SBforeignlanguageclass.pdf

6. Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2001). Running with technology: The pedagogic impact of the large scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(3), 257-276.

7. Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2002). The introduction of interactive whiteboards into schools in the UK: Leaders, led and the management of pedagogic and technological change. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 6(24).

8. Grabarek, M. A. (2003). Computers in classrooms & classrooms on computers: Ideas from your colleagues for teaching & leaning with technology. Retrieved November 22, 2004, from http://courses.durhamtech.edu/tlc/www/html/Special_Feature/ideas.htm

9. Latham, P. (2002). Teaching and learning primary mathematics: The impact of interactive whiteboards. London: BEAM Education.

10. Lee, M., & Boyle, M. (2003). The educational effects and implications of the interactive whiteboard strategy of Richardson primary school: A brief review. Retrieved June 5, 2004, from http://www.richardsonps.act.edu.au

11. Singhanayok, C., & Hooper, S. (1998). The effects of cooperative learning and learner control on students’ achievement, option selections, and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46, 117-33.

12. Smith, H. (2002). Interactive whiteboard evaluation. Retrieved June 5, 2004, from http://www.kented.org.uk/ngfl/whiteboards/

13. Wishart, J., & Blease, D. (1999). Theories underlying perceived changes in teaching learning after installing a computer network in a secondary school. British Journal of Education Technology, 30(1), 25-42. Retrieved June 6, 2004, from Academic Search Elite on GALILEO: http://www.galileo.peachnet.edu

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.