Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » By Affiliations
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top 20 Journal Cited
 » Top 20 Cited
 » Top 20 Author Cited
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Exploring the connection between the testing of reading and literacy: The case of the MUET

Lee, King Siong, (2004) Exploring the connection between the testing of reading and literacy: The case of the MUET. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 4 (1). pp. 1-10. ISSN 1675-8021

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
53Kb

Official URL: http://www.fpbahasa.ukm.my/linguistics/Gema/GemaVol4.1.2004No4.pdf

Affiliations

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Abstract

The Malaysian University English Test (MUET), introduced in 1999, is a potentially high-stakes test because of the fact that it is a mandatory requirement for admission into public universities. It was introduced with the aim of bringing about a higher level of English proficiency, especially crucial for those entering university. The paper focuses on the impact of the Reading component on literacy, and examines four factors that are perceived to affect the impact of the MUET, namely: 1) the perceived status of the MUET, 2) the sociopolitical situation, 3) the teacher/teaching, and 4) the test construct. It concludes that the reading construct in the MUET Reading component is inadequately operationalized and suggests that the construct be reviewed in the light of long-term literacy goals.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:MUET, English Language proficiency, English test, University entrance
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:512

1.Alderson, J.C. (2000) Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

2.Alderson, J.C. and Hamp-Lyons,L. (1996) TOEFL preparation courses: a study of washback. Language Testing13 (3), 280-297

3.Alderson, J.C. and Wall, D. (1993) Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics 14 (2). 115-129

4.Bachman, L.F. and Palmer, A.S. (1996) Language Testing in practice Oxford: Oxford University Press

5.Cheng, L. (1997) How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong Kong. Language and Education 235 11(1), 38-54

6.Frederiksen, N. (1984) The Real Test Bias American Psychologist, March, 193-202

7.Gipps, Caroline V. (1994) Beyond Testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: The Falmer Press

8.Heath, S.B. (1991) ‘The Sense of Being Literate : Historical and Cross-cultural Features’ in P.D. Pearson, R.Barr, M.L. Kamil, and P.B.Mosenthal (Eds) Handbook of Reading Research Vol II. New York: Longman, 3-25 Kern, Richard (2000) Literacy and Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.

9.Latham, H. (1877) On the Action of Examinations Considered as a Means of Selection. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell

10.Lee, King Siong (2004) Reading into our Reading Tests in Wijayasuriya, Basil and Fatimah Hashim (Eds) Reading Connections Petaling Jaya: Sasbadi Sdn Bhd ,128-140

11.Lee, King Siong and Wong, Fook Fei (2001) Making washback work. The English Teacher (MELTA) Vol XXIX March 2001, 12-22

12.Li, X. (1990) How powerful can a language test be? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 11 (5), 393-404

13.Madaus, G.F. (1988) The influence of testing on the curriculum. In Travers L. (ed) Critical Issues in curriculum ( 87 th yearbook of the Society for the study of Education) Part 1. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 83-121

14.Messick, S. (1989) Validity. In Linn, R.L. (ed) Educational Measurement 3 rd edition, American Council onEducation/Macmillan, New York, 13-103

15.Popham, J. (1987) The merits of measurement driven instruction. Phi Delta Kappa May, 679-682

16.Shohamy, E. (1993) The power of tests:the impact of language tests on teaching and learning (NFLC Occasional Papers) The National Foreign Language Centre, Washington D.C.

17.Shohamy, E., Donitsa-Schmidt, S., Ferman, I. (1996) Test impact revisited: washback effect over time. Language Testing 13 (3) 298-317

Street, B.V. (1984) Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

18.Spolsky,Bernard (1995) Measured Words: The Development of Objective Language Testing. Oxford: OUP

19.Sunday Star, Malaysia 27 July 2003

20.Wall, D. and Alderson, J.C. (1993) Examining washback: the Sri Lankan Impact Study. Language Testing 10 (1), 41-69

21.Venezky, R.L. (1990) Definitions of Literacy. In Venezky, R.L. et al (Eds) 1990 Towards Defining Literacy. Newark,D.E. International Reading Association

22.Urquhart, A.H. and Weir, C.J. (1998) Reading in a second Language:Process,Product and Practice. Longman.

23.Wallace, C. (1992) Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press

24.Watanabe,Y. (1996) Does grammar-translation come from the entrance examination? Preliminary findings from classroom-based research. Language Testing 13 (3), 319-333

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
   
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.