Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Perkaitan Semantik dalam Penulisan [Relationship of Semantics in Writings]

Abdul Jalil Othman, (2001) Perkaitan Semantik dalam Penulisan [Relationship of Semantics in Writings]. Masalah Pendidikan, 24 . pp. 141-157. ISSN 0126-5024

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
59Kb

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Education.

Abstract

Transitions between ideas is said to be largely a matter of attitude. To convince ideas one must perhaps not only write beautiful sentences, but must also write sentences that are said to be properly connected. Thus, there are several basic considerations one should learn in providing transitions between ideas. Among them are using transitional expressions, repeating key words and phrases, using pronoun reference and using parallel form.

Item Type:Journal
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:5146

1. Abdul Aziz Abdul Talib. (1885). Langkah-langkah permulaan dalam mengajar kanak-kanak menulis karangan: Satu Pendekatan, Jurnal Dewan Bahasa, No. 31, Bil. 10.

2. Abdul Aziz Abdul Talib, (1989). Pengajaran dan pengujian bahasa: Perspektif untuk perguruan. Kuala Lumpur: Nurin Enterprise.

3. Abdul Jalil Othman. (1989). Rujukan segera Bahasa Malaysia KBSM. Kuala Lumpur: Berita Publishing Sdn. Bhd.

4. Awang Sariyan. (1980). Kesalahan umum penggunaan Bahasa Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

5. Brown, H. D. (1980). Principles of language learning and teaching. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

6. Deese, J. (1984). Thought into speech: The pychology of a language. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.

7. Grimmes, J.E. (1975). The thread of discourse. The Hague: Mounton and Co.

8. Gutwinski, W. (1976). Cohesion in literary texts. The Hague : Mounton.

9. Halliday M.A.K and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

10. Halliday M.A.K. and Hasan, R. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

11. Hunt, K. W (1985). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. NCTE Research Report. Urbana, Illinois: NCTE.

12. James, C. (1980). Contrastive analysis. London : Longman Group Ltd.

13. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, (1988). Sukatan pelajaran sekolah menengab, Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

14. Kress, G.R. (1982). Learning to write. London, Boston and Henley: Rontledge & KeganPaul Ltd.

15. Khathijah Abdul Hamid. (1984). Analisis penguasaan sintaksis dalam karangan murid-murid tingkatan empat di sebuah sekolah menengah. Disertasi ijazah sarjana pendidikañ (tidak diterbitkan), Fakulti Pendidikan, Univerisiti Malaya.

16. Khatijah Abdul Hamid, (1994). Analisis kohesi dan koheren dalam karangan bahasa Melayu pelajar-pelajar tingkatan empat di sebuah sekolah menengah. Cadangan penyelidikan ijazah doktor Falsafah (tidak diterbitkan), Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Malaya.

17. Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing, London: Oxford Universiti Press.

18. Smith, F. (1982). Writing and the writer. London: Heinman Educational Book.

19. Tarigan, H.G. (1980). Menyimak sebagai suatu ketrampilan berbahasa. Bandung: FKSSSIKIP.

20. Tarigan, H.G. (1987). Pengajaran wacana. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa.

21. Tarigan, H.G. (1995). Pengajaran wacana, Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

22. Widdowson, H.G. (1979). E.ploration in applied linguistic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Repository Staff Only: item control page