Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Pembentukan Model Sekolah Berkesan Malaysia: Satu Kajian Delphi

Shahril Charil Hj Marzuki, and Muhammad Faizal A. Ghani, (2007) Pembentukan Model Sekolah Berkesan Malaysia: Satu Kajian Delphi. Jurnal Pendidikan, 27 (1). pp. 179-199. ISSN 01265261

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
114Kb

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Education.
University of Malaya. Faculty of Education.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to develop an effective school model based on the Malaysian context. To obtain experts’ consensus, the Delphi Technique has been chosen as the method of study. Fifteen experts from various fields with wide experience in school leadership have been chosen as respondents. The use of four rounds Delphi Technique in this study has successfully identified seven contributory aspects and their strategies to make schools more effective. Furthermore, the experts‘ consensus was that all 138 items in the fourth round of the Delphi Technique can be used as the content of the Malaysian Effective School Model.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:School models, Leadership in schools
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:5195

1. Abdul Karim Md Nor. (1989). Characteristics of effective rural secondary schools in Malaysia. Tesis kedoktoran yang tidak diterbitkan, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA. Dimuat turun pada 10 Januari, 2007, daripada EPRD, KPM.

2. Anderberg, M. R. (1973). Cluster analysis for applications. New York: Academic Press.

3. Basu, J., & Schroeder, D. (1977, June). People productivity. Modern Office Technology, 3, 12-19. Dimuat turun pada 20 November, 2006, daripada ProQuest database.

4. Bolender, M. (2004). A study of the evolving image of a new school within the context of school effectiveness. SSTA Research Center Report No. 97-08. Dimuat turun pada 13 Mac, 2005 daripada http://www.sstarc.forumfyi.org.

5. Chan, Y. F. (1999). Pengurusan strategik ke arah sekolah berkesan. Khidmat dan Suara Rasmi JPA, 39, 20-26. Dimuat turun pada 20 November, 2006, daripada http://www.planetklik.com.my.

6. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15-27.

7. Frost, D., & Durrant, J. (2003). Teacher leadership: Rationale, strategy and impact. School Leadership and Management, 23(2), 173-186. Dimuat turun pada 10 Disember, 2006, daripada ProQuest database.

8. Gatewood, L. J., & Gatewood, D. J. (1983). Applied imagination. New York: Scribners.

9. Harris, A. (2002). School improvement: What’s in it for schools? London: Falmer Press.

10. Helmer, O. (1968). Analysis of the future: The Delphi Method. Dalam J. R. Bright (Ed.), Technological forecasting for industry and government: Method and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

11. Ludwig, B. (1997). Predicting the future: Have you considered using the Delphi methodology? Journal of Extension, 35(5), 233-239. Dimuat turun pada 12 November, 2006, daripada http://www.joe.org/joe/1997october/tt2.html

12. Martino, J. P. (1972). Technologies forecasting for decision making. New York: Elsevier.

13. Marzano , R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action .Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

14. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Quantitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

15. Purkey, S., & Smith, M. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal, 83, 427-462.

16. Rahimah Ahmad, Zulkifli Abdul Manaf, & Shahril Marzuki. (1999). School effectiveness and school improvement in Malaysia. Dalam T. Townsend, P. Clarke, & M. Ainscow (Sid. Ed.), Third millennium schools: A world of difference in effectiveness and improvement (ms. 265-282). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.

17. Rawitch, C Z. (1991). Minority students and journalism education: A model program design using the Delphi technique. Tesis kedoktoran tidak diterbitkan. University of Georgia, USA. Dimuat turun pada 12 September, 2006. daripada ProQuest Database. (Dissertation Abstract Item: AAT9300498).

18. Sackman, H. (1975). Delphi technique: Expert opinion, forecasting and group process. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

19. Saedah Siraj. (1998). Kurikulum berkesan. Dalam Marohaini Yusof, Zulkifli Manaf, Aini Hassan, Shahril Marzuki, Ananda Kumar, & Abdul Jalil Othman (Eds.), Pendidikan guru untuk sekolah berkesan. Kuala Lumpur: Fakulti Pendidikan, UM.

20. Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. New York: Elsevier.

21. Shahril Marzuki. (1997). Kajian sekolah berkesan di Malaysia: Model lima faktor. Tesis kedoktoran yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

22. Silver, H. (1994). Good schools, effective schools: Judgement and their histories. London: Cassell.

23. Slaughter, R. A. (1995). Future tools and techniques. DDM Media Group. Dimuat turun pada 12 November, 2006, daripada http://www.cl.uh.edu/futureweb/futdef.html

24. Steward, J., O’Halloran, C., Harrigan, P., & Spencer, J. A. (1999). Identifying appropriate tasks for the preregistration year: Modified Delphi technique. British Medical Journal, 319(7204), 224-229. Dimuat turun pada 23 Novemher,2006 daripada http://bmj.bmjjourbnals.com/cgi/content/abstract/319/7204/224

25. Stoll, L., & Myers, K. (1997). No quick fixes: Perspectives on schools in difficulty. London: Falmer Press.

26. Townsend, T. (2001, Januari 6). Satan or saviour? Reflection and futures of school effectiveness and school improvement research. Kertas kerja dibentangkan di International Congress for School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Monash University, Australia. Dimuat turun pada 12 November, 2006, daripada http://www.ccea.org.uk/pubs.htm

27. Vanderstoep, S. W., Anderman, F. M., & Midgley, C. (2005). The relationship among principal “venturesomeness”, a stress on excellence and the personal engagement of teachers and students. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5, 254-271. Dimuat turun pada 18 Disember, 2006, daripada ProQuest database.

28. West, M., Jackson, D., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2000). Leadership for school improvement. Dalam K. Riley & K. Seashore Louis (Eds.), Leadership for change. London: Routledge.

29. Wicklein, R. C. (1993). Identifying critical issues and problems in technology education using a modified-Delphi Technique. Journal of Technology Education, 5(1), 34-45. Dimuat turun pada 23 Disember, 2006, daripada http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/ej-search.html

30. Williams, D.L., Boone, R., & Kingsley, K.V. (2004). Teacher belief about educational software: A Delphi Study. Journal of Research on Teaching in Education, 36(3), 213-229. Dimuat turun pada 12 November, 2006, daripada http://www.ryerson.ca/~mjoppe/ResearchProcess/841TheDelphiMethod.htm

31. Yeager, P. (1995). Parents view home schooling as viable option. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5, 149-77. Dimuat turun pada 24 November, 2006, daripada ProQuest database.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.