Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Teachers’ Choice of Participation in the Decision Making Process

Vasutheven, Sasidharan, and Tie, Fatt Hee, (2004) Teachers’ Choice of Participation in the Decision Making Process. Jurnal Pendidikan, 24 . pp. 41-48. ISSN 0126-5261

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
70Kb

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Education.
University of Malaya. Faculty of Education.

Abstract

Penglibatan guru dalam proses membuat keputusan merupakan satu elemen penting dalam menentukan kejayaan sesebuah sekolah. Kajian ini menilai sejauh manakah guru-guru terlibat dalam proses membuat keputusan di sekolah. Instrumen yang digubal oleh Savery (1992) diubahsuai untuk kajian ini. Penglibatan guru dalam proses membuat keputusan merangkumi sembilan aspek iaitu dalam dasar sekolah; disiplin pelajar; angkubah ekonomi; beban pengajaran; dasar umum; penglibatan ibu bapa; peruntukan masa; domain pengajaran; dan, domain pengurusan. Empat jenis respons subjek terdiri daripada: keputusan dibuat hanya oleh pengetua; perundingan dengan guru tetapi keputusan dilakukan oleh pengetua; keputusan ditetapkan oleh pengetua bersama guru; dan, keputusan dilakukan hanya oleh guru. Kajian menunjukkan bahawa disiplin pelajar, peruntukan masa dan domain pengajaran merupakan tiga aspek yang dianggap amat memerlukan penglibatan guru dalam proses membuat keputusan.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Teachers, Decision making
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:5205

1. Barnard, C. I. (1938). Functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

2. Benson, N., & Malone, P. (1987). Teachers’ beliefs about shared decision making and work alienation. Education, 107, 244-251

3. Bolin, F. S. (1989). Empowering leadership. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 81-86.

4. Conley, S. (1991). Review of research on teacher participation in school decision making. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 17, pp. 225-266). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

5. Drucker, P. (1966). The effective executive. New York: Harper.

6. Duke, D. L., Showers, B. K., & Imber, M. (1980). Teachers and shared decision making: The costs and benefits of involvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16, 93-106.

7. Dunphy, D. (1976). The implications of management: Industrial democracy in Australia. Sydney: CCH Australia.

8. Hager, J. L., & Scarr, L. E. (1983). Effective schools - Effective principals: How to develop both. Educational Leadership, 40(5).

9. High, R. M., Achilles, C. M., & High, K. (1989). Involvement in what? Teachers‘ actual and preferred involvement in selected school activities. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee.

10. Imber, M. (1990). Factors contributing to teachers’ satisfaction with participative decision making. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23 (4).

11. Miniberg, E. I. (1970). The relationship between decision making & innovative activity: A study of the relationship among teacher perceptions and the locus of decision making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.

12. Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper.

13. Mohrman, A. M. (1978). Participation in decision making: A multidimensional perspective. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 14 (1).

14. Pejza, J. (1985). The Catholic school principal. A different kind of leader Paper presented at the annual Meeting of the National Catholic Education Association. St. Louis, April. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 256053).

15. Renegar, W. R. (1974). A comparison of views as expressed by faculty and administrators pertaining to participation in decision making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Auburn University.

16. Savery, L. K. (1992). The ideal decision making styles indicated by white collar workers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 7.

17. Schneider, G. T. (1984). Teachers’ involvement in decision making: Zones of acceptance, decision conditions and job satisfaction. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 18 (1).

18. Smylie, M. A. (1992). Teacher participation in school decision making: Assessing the willingness to participate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14 (3), 53-67.

19. Stein, R., & King, B. (1992). Is restructuring a threat to principals’ power? NASSP Bulletin, 76.

20. Taylor, D., & Tashakkori, A. (1997). Towards an understanding of teachers’ desire for participation in decision making. Journal of School Leadership, 7, 609-628.

21. Williams, R.B. (1990). Teacher professional autonomy and collective bargaining: Conflict or compromise? Education Canada, 30(4) 4.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.