Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Teachers’ Orientation towards Students’ Note Taking: Scale Validation

Sahari M., and Nik A. Hisham, and Nik Suryani, and Marzuki A., (2004) Teachers’ Orientation towards Students’ Note Taking: Scale Validation. Jurnal Pendidikan, 24 . pp. 61-72. ISSN 0126-5261

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
132Kb

Affiliations

International Islamic University Malaysia. Centre for Education & Human Development.
International Islamic University Malaysia. Centre for Education & Human Development.
International Islamic University Malaysia. Centre for Education & Human Development.
International Islamic University Malaysia. Centre for Education & Human Development.

Abstract

Kajian ini menguji secara empirikal satu model teoretikal tentang orientasi guru terhadap penyediaan nota pelajaran yang dicernakan sebagai didasari oleh tiga dimensi bebas. Prosedur persampelan rambang dijalankan di 28 buah sekolah menengah, melibatkan 749 guru terlatih yang dipilih dan populasi seramai 2296 guru. Sejumlah 15 item diuji daripada satu instrumen yang telah digunakan dalam kajian terdahulu; setiap item dijangkakan berkaitan dengan satu daripada tiga orientasi berkenaan. Hasil analisis mengesahkan bahawa orientasi guru terhadap tingkah laku murid menyediakan nota bersifat multi-dimensi; iaitu orientasi-orientasi deduktif, konstruktif, dan evaluatif. Kedua, terdapat korelasi yang sederhana antara orientasi konstruktif dengan orientasi evaluatif, manakala hubung kait antara faktor-faktor lain adalah rendah. Orientasi tiga-faktor itu menerbitkan satu model pengukuran yang sah dan boleh dipercayai dan ia sesuai digunakan untuk membantu proses mendidik guru ke arah pendidik yang konstruktif.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Note taking amongst students
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:5207

1. Arbuckle, J. L. (1989). AMOS: Analysis of moment structure. American Statisticians, 43, 66.

2. Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1995). AMOS 4.0 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters.

3. Ausubel, D. P. (1962). A subsumption theory of meaningful learning and retention. Journal of Psychology, 66, 213-244.

4. Barr, R., & Tagg, J. (1995, November). From teaching to learning. Change, 13-25.

5. Carroll, W. M. (1997). Technology and teachers’ curricular orientations. Educational Horizons, 75 (2), 66-72.

6. Cheung, D. (2000). Measuring teachers’ orientations to curriculum: Application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 149-159.

7. Cunningham, R. (1985, December). Curriculum orientation of home economics teachers. Paper presented at the American Vocational Association Convention, St. Louis, MO.

8. Cunningham, R., & Moore, D. W. (1986). The confused world of main ideas. In J. B. Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension, (pp. 1-29). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

9. Dee-Lucas, D., & DiVesta, F. J. (1979). Learner generated organizational aids: Effects on learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 304-311.

10. Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264.

11. Duell, O. K. (1986). Metacognitive skills. In G. D. Phye & T. Andre (Eds.), Cognitive classroom learning. Orlando, FL: Academic.

12. Einstein, G. O., Morris, J., & Smith, S. (1985). Notetaking, individual differences, and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 522-532.

13. Fernstermacher, G. D. (1986). Philosophy of research on teaching: Three aspects. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 37-49). New York: Macmillan.

14. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.

15. Foil, C. R., & Alber, S. R. (2002). Fun and effective ways to build your students’ vocabulary. Intervention in School and Clinic, 37, 131-141.

16. Glynn, S. M., & DiVesta, F. J. (1977). Outline and hierarchical organization as aids for study and retrieval. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 89-95.

17. Harris, K. R., & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of instruction: Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392-417.

18. Hortin, S. U., Lovitt, T. C., & Christensen, C. C. (1991). Note-taking from textbooks: Effects of a columnar format on three categories of secondary students. Exceptionality, 2, 20-24.

19. Howe, M. J. (1970). Using students’ notes to examine the role of the individual learner in acquiring meaningful subject matter. Journal of Educational Research, 64 (2), 61-63.

20. Isaacs, G. (1994). Lecturing practices and note-taking purposes. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 203-217.

21. Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Providing the instructor’s notes: An effective addition to note-taking. Educational Psychologist, 20, 23-32.

22. Kiewra, K. A. (2002). How classroom teachers can help students learn and teach them how to learn. Theory into Practice, 41, 71-80.

23. Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., & McShane, A. (1988). Providing study notes: A comparison of three types of notes for review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 595-597.

24. Kneale, P. E. (1998). Note-taking for geography students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 22, 427-433.

25. Lasley II, T. J. (1998). Paradigm shifts in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 84-86.

26. Lazarus, B. D. (1991). Guided notes, review, and achievement of secondary students with learning disabilities in mainstream content courses. Education and Treatment of Children, 14, 112-127.

27. Mayer, R. E. (1992). Cognition and instruction: On their historic meeting within educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 405-412.

28. Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SIO model for guiding three cognitive constructions in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 357-371.

29. Mayer, R. E. (1999). Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 141-159).

30. Meter, P. V., Yokoi, L., & Pressley, M. (1994). College students’ theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 323-338.

31. Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Generative effects of note-taking during science lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 34-38.

32. Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context bound? Educational Researcher 18, 16-25.

33. Plotnick, E. (2001). A graphical system for understanding the relationship between concepts. Teacher Librarian, 28, 42-44.

34. Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181-221.

35. Sahari, M. (1999). The effectiveness of coding as a text-processing strategy: A meta analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 20, 27-38.

36. Sahari, M. (2000). Students’ note-taking strategy: Development of teacher orientation scale. Unpublished manuscript, International Islamic University Malaysia.

37. Scheaffer, R. L., Mendenhall, W., & Ott, R. L. (1996). Elementary survey sampling (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

38. Smith, D., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teacher and Teacher Education, 5, 1-20.

39. Suritsky, S. K., & Hughes, C. A. (1991). Benefits of notetaking: Implications for secondary and post secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 7-18.

40. Tuckman, B. W. (1992). Educational psychology: From theory to practice. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.

41. Tuckman, B. W. (1993). The coded elaborative outline as a strategy to help students to learn from text. Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 5-13.

42. Weishaar, M. K., & Boyle, J. R. (1999). Note-taking strategies for students with disabilities. The Clearing House, 76, 392-395.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.