Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Effects of Combined Strategy Instruction and Attribution Retraining on Students’ Academic Achievement

Loh, Sau Cheong, and Habibah Elias, and Sharifah Md. Nor, and Rahil Mahyuddin, and Jegak Uli, (2004) Effects of Combined Strategy Instruction and Attribution Retraining on Students’ Academic Achievement. Jurnal Pendidikan, 24 . pp. 83-91. ISSN 0126-5261

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
54Kb

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Education.
Universiti Putra Malaysia. Faculty of Educational Studies.
Universiti Putra Malaysia. Faculty of Educational Studies.
Universiti Putra Malaysia. Faculty of Educational Studies.
Universiti Putra Malaysia. Faculty of Educational Studies.

Abstract

Kajian ini meneliti kesan gabungan pengajaran strategi dan latihan semula atribusi terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar Satu program latihan semula atribusi yang berasaskan strategi telah djalankan ke atas 133 orang pelajar dari sebuah sekolah yang terpilih. Rekabentuk Kumpulan Kawalan Tak Setara telah digunakan. Empat jenis rawatan, iaitu gabungan pengajaran strategi dan latihan semula atribusi, pengajaran strategi sahaja, latihan semula atribusi sahaja dan tanpa rawatan telah diagihkan secara rawak kepada empat kumpulan rawak. Keputusan kajian menunjukkan penambahan yang signifikan dalam min skor pencapaian bagi ketiga-tiga kumpulan eksperimental berbanding dengan kumpulan kawalan tanpa rawatan (perbezaan min=15.07, p=.0005). Kumpulan gabungan pengajaran strategi dan latihan semula atribusi dan juga kumpulan pengajaran strategi sahaja memaparkan penambahan yang signifikan dalam min skor pencapaian berbanding dengan kumpulan latihan semula atribusi sahaja (perbezaan min=7.81, p=.006). Beberapa implikasi daripada hasil kajian juga telah dibincangkan.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Attribution retraining, academic performance
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:5213

1. Ames, C. (1987). The enhancement of student motivation. In M. Maehr & D. Kleiber (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 5, Enhancing motivation, pp. 123-148). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

2. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (1996). Introduction to research in education (5th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.

3. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Muffin.

4. Feldman, K. A. (1989). The association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multi-section validity studies. Research in Higher Education, 30, 583-645.

5. Gronlund, N. E. (1993). How to make achievement tests and assessments (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

6. Marsh, H. W., & Dunkin, M. J. (1992). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Vol. 8 (pp. 143-233). New York: Agathon.

7. Murray, H. G. (1991). Teaching effectiveness in higher education. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education. Handbook of theory and research, Vol. 7 (pp. 135-172). New York: Agathon.

8. Perry, R. P. (1991). Perceived control in college students: Implications for instruction in higher education. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Vol. 7 (PP. 1-56). New York: Agathon.

9. Perry, R. P., Hechter, F. J., Menec, V. H., & Weinberg, L. E. (1993). Enhancing achievement motivation and performance in college students: An attributional retraining perspective. Research in Higher Education, 34 (6), 687-723.

10. Scannell, E. E., & Newstrom, J. W. (1994). The complete games trainers play: Experiential learning exercises. New York: McGraw Hill.

11. Thompson, T. (1994). Self-worth protection: Review and implications for the classroom. Educational Review, 46 (3), 259-274.

12. Van Overwalle, F., & De Metsenaere, M. (1990). The effects of attribution-based intervention and study strategy training on academic achievement in college freshmen. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 299-311.

13. Weiner, B. (1972). Attribution theory, achievement motivation, and the educational process. Review of Educational Research, 42 (2), 203-215.

14. Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning.

15. Weiner, B. (1977). Attribution and affect: Comments on Sohn’s critique. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(5), 506-511.

16. Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3-25.

17. Weiner, B. (1983). Some methodological pitfalls in attributional research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 530-543.

18. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.

19. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.

20. Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories and research. London: Sage.

21. Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12 (1), 1-14.

22. Weiner, B., Nierenberg, R., & Goldstein, M. (1976). Social learning (locus of control) versus attributional (causal ability) interpretations of expectancy of success. Journal of Personality, 44, 52-68.

Repository Staff Only: item control page