Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Aplikasi Teknologi dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Peringkat Sekolah Menengah: Jangkaan Masa Depan

Saedah Siraj, and Mohd Paris Saleh, (2003) Aplikasi Teknologi dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Peringkat Sekolah Menengah: Jangkaan Masa Depan. Jurnal Pendidikan, 23 . pp. 123-139. ISSN 0126-5261

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
182Kb

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Education
University of Malaya. Faculty of Education

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain experts’ consensus on technological application for the future in teaching and learning at secondary school level. Eight experts involved in information and communications technology and educational technology were chosen as respondents. The method used for this study is Delphi technique. The study findings show that 25 technology equipment and tools are forecasted to be developed in 15 years to come and 12 items associated with the effects on technology application of teaching and learning have reached experts’ consensus. All items that represent future forecast of technological application for teachers and students have reached high experts’ consensus. The findings also indicate that technological development has a significant impact on teaching and learning thus increasing the necessity for curriculum designers in planning for future changes.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Educational technology, Computer assisted instructions
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:5244

1. Amara, R. C., & Salancik, G. R. (1972). Forecasting: From conjectural art toward science. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 4, 415-426.

2. Bell, R., & Ramirez, R. (1997). Ensuring equitable use of education technology. Pathways to School Improvement. Dimuat turun pada Januari 30, 2003, daripada http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/methods/technlgy/te400.htm

3. Cornish, E. (1999). The cyber futures. Dimuat turun pada Oktober 1, 2003, daripada http://leep.lis.uiuc.edu/spring02/LIS450CML/Forecasting/Cyberfuture.pdf

4. Dick, W (1991). An instructional designer’s view of constructivism. Educational Technology, 31(5), 41-44.

5. Fiske, E. B., Reed, S. D., & Sautter, R. C. (1992). Smart schools, smart kids: Why do some schools work? New York: Simon & Schuster.

6. Gagnon, G. W., Jr. & Collay, M. (2001). Constructivist learning design. Dimuat turun pada Oktober 1, 2002, daripada http://www.prainbow.com/cld/cldp.html

7. Glenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (2000). State of the future at the millennium. Washington, DC: American Council for The United Nations University.

8. Glenn, J.C. & Gordon, T.J. (2001). 2001 state of the future. Washington, DC: American Council for The United Nations University.

9. Glenn, J.C. & Gordon, T.J. (2002). 2002 state of the future. Washington, DC: American Council for The United Nations University.

10. Glenn, J.C. & Gordon, T.J. (2003). 2003 state of the future. Washington, DC: American Council for The United Nations University.

11. Gordon, T. J. (1994). Cross-impact method. Washington DC: The United Nations University.

12. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (1999). Instructional media and technologies for learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

13. Helmer, O. (1972). Cross impact gaming. Futures, 4(2), 149-67.

14. Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1998). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

15. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

16. Lunenburg, F. C. (1998). Constructivism and technology: Instructional designs for successful education reform. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25(2), 75-81.

17. Marzano, R. J. (1992). A different kind of classroom: Teaching with dimensions of learning. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

18. Prayun Sriprasart. (1970). Delphi technique. Journal of National Education, 3, 50-59.

19. Reigeluth, C. M. (1987). The search for meaningful educational reform: A third wave educational system. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(4), 3-14.

20. Saedah Siraj. (1999). Kurikulum ke arah pembentukan golongan pemikir, perekacipta dan profesional. Jurnal Kurikulum, 1(2), 42-56.

21. Saedah Siraj (Ed.). (2000). Perkembangan kurikulum: Teori dan amalan. Sg. Buloh, Selangor: Alam Pintar.

22. Saedah Siraj (2001). Pembinaan kurikulum. Dimuat turun pada Mac 2, 2001, daripada http://www.planetklik.com.my

23. Saedah Siraj 2002, Jun 17). Curriculum planning for future education. Ucap Utama di Seminar on Curriculum and Instruction, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani Campus, Thailand.

24. Saedah Siraj 2003, Mac 27). M-Learning curriculum for the future. Ucap Utama 2. Dalam Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Learning (ICML). Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.

25. Slaughter, R. A. (1995). Futures tools and techniques. Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia: Futures Studies Centre.

26. Snow, H. (1999). Mass dream of the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.

27. Wissema, J. G., & Benes, J. (1980, Oktober). A Cross-impact case study: The Dutch construction sector. Futures, 394-404.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.