Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Temu Duga Klinikal: Asas Dalam Mengenal Pasti Pengetahuan Murid Tentang Sesuatu Konsep

Aida Suraya Md. Yunus, (1999) Temu Duga Klinikal: Asas Dalam Mengenal Pasti Pengetahuan Murid Tentang Sesuatu Konsep. Jurnal Pendidikan, 20 . pp. 1-11. ISSN 0126-5261

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
55Kb

Affiliations

Universiti Putra Malaysia. Faculty of Educational Studies.

Abstract

Clinical interview involves the gathering of a rich corpus of data from flexible questioning of individuals on a one-to-one basis based on a semi-structured interview schedule and further questioning based on the individual’s responses. The success of the clinical interview much depends on the problematic questions and contingency questions posed during the interview, else the interview would not gather enough relevant data to be used as a basis for inferring underlying cognitive processes. This paper discusses the concept of clinical interview, procedures in administering clinical interviews, and stages in analyzing data collected through clinical interviews.

Item Type:Journal
Additional Information:This note was added by the search_and_modify.pl script.
Keywords:Clinical interviews, Understanding of concepts in education, Educational assessments
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:5245

1. Aida Suraya bt. Hj. Md.Yunus (1996). Skim nombor perpuluhan bagi murid tahun lima sekolah rendah. Tesis Ph. D. yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

2. Brainerd, C. J. (1978). Piaget’s theory of intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice Hall.

3. Cobb, P. & Steffe, L. P. (1983). The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 83-94.

4. Confrey, J. (1980). Clinical interviewing: Its potential to reveal insights in mathematics education. Dalam R. Karplus (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Berkeley, California.

5. Ginsburg, H. P., Kossan, N. E., Schwartz, R., & Swanson, D. (1983). Protocol methods in research on mathematical thinking. Dalam H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (hlm. 7-47). Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.

6. Hunting, R. P. & Sharpley, C. F. (1985). A preliminary investigation of preschoolers’ cognition of fractional units. Unpublished manuscript. Monash University.

7. Kilpatrick, J. (1987). What constructivism might be in mathematics education. Dalam J. C. Bergeron, N. Herscovic & C. Kieren (Eds.). Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Vol 1 (hlm. 3-27). Montreal: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

8. Nik Azis Nik Pa. (1987). Children’s fractional schemes. Tesis Ed.D. yang tidak diterbitkan, University of Georgia, Athens.

9. Opper, S. (1977). Piaget’s clinical method. Journal of Children’s Mathematical Behavior, 1(4), 90-107.

10. Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conceptions of the world. New York: Harcourt and Brace.

11. Sharifah Norul Akmar Syed Zamri (1998). Kaedah temu duga klinikal dalam penyeidikan pendidikan matematik. Jurnal Pendidikan, 19, 89 — 103.

12. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1990). Small group Interactions as a source of learning oppurtunities in second grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 390-408.

Repository Staff Only: item control page