Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Intertekstualiti: Satu Pendekatan Alternatif bagi Memahami Teks Bacaan

Mahzan Arshad, (1999) Intertekstualiti: Satu Pendekatan Alternatif bagi Memahami Teks Bacaan. Jurnal Pendidikan, 20 . pp. 13-26. ISSN 0126-5261

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
120Kb

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Education.

Abstract

Intertextualiy is a concept that has been traced in literacy education and literary criticism from various perspectives and scholarship background far the last three decades. It is a process of making connections or links between current text and past texts, the transposition of one or several texts into other texts. This paper provides information on how readers make intertextual links within texts and between texts while reading four pieces of multicultural literature.

Item Type:Journal
Additional Information:This note was added by the search_and_modify.pl script.
Keywords:Reading comprehension, Reading literacy, Readers
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:5270

1. Bakthin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. Dalam M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays (hlm. 259-422) (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Terjemahan), Austin: University of Texas Press.

2. Barthes, R. C. (1986). Form work to text. Dalam J. V. Harari (Ed.), The rustle of language, (hlm. 54-64). New York: Hill & Wang.

3. Bloome, D. & Egan-Robertson, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lesson. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(4), 305-333.

4. Cairney, T. H. (1990). Intertextuality: Infection echoes from the past. The Reading Teacher, 43, 478-485.

5. Christensen, L. B. (1997). Experimental methodology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

6. Derrida, J. (1972). La dissemination. Paris: Edition du Seuil.

7. de Beaugrande, R. (1980). Text, discourse and process. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

8. de Beaugrande, R. & Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman.

9. Green, S. (1995). Writing from sources: Authority in text and task.

10. Gumprez, J. (1986). Discourse strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

11. Hartman, D. K. (1992). Intertextuality and reading: The text, the reader, the author and the context. Linguistic and Education, 4, 295-311.

12. Hartman, D. K. (1995). Eight readers reading The intertextual links of proficient readers reading multiple passages. Reading Research ,Quarterly, 30(3), 520-561.

13. Kristeva, J. (1969). Semeotika: Recherches puor une semanalyse. Paris: Edition de Seuil.

14. Kristeva, J. (1974). Revolution in poetic language. (M. Waller, Terjemahan) New York: Columbia University Press.

15. Lehr, S. C. (1988). The child developing sense of theme as a response to literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 337-357.

16. Mahzan Arshad (1994). Pencapaian pelajar dalam ujian pemahaman bacaan kesusasteraan. Jurnal Pendidikan, 16, 45-57.

17. Mahzan Arshad (1998). Malaysian student teachers’ rerponses to multicultural literature. Disertasi Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan, University of Pittsburgh.

18. Perkins, D. (1992). Smart schools: Better thinking and learning for every child. New York, NY: The Free Press.

19. Plottel, J. P. & Charney, H. (Eds.). (1978). Intertextuality: New perspectives in criticism. New York: New York literary Forum.

20. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of literary works. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

21. Scheock, R. J. C. (1984). Intertextuality and renaissance texts. Bambergh: H. Kaiser-Verlag.

22. Spivey, N. N. (1990). Transforming texts: Constructive process in reading and writing. Written Communication, 7, 256-287.

23. The National Assessment of Education Progress (1981). The Department of Education. United States of America.

24. Witte, S. P. (1992). Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9(2), 237-308.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.