Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Students’ Intellectual Growth in Geometry: A Case Study of form Two Students

Noraini Idris, (1999) Students’ Intellectual Growth in Geometry: A Case Study of form Two Students. Jurnal Pendidikan, 20 . pp. 71-82. ISSN 0126-5261

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
49Kb

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Education.

Abstract

Artikel ini membincangkan keputusan kajian tentang peringkat-peringkat van Hiele yang dipunyai oleh pelajar Tingkatan Dua dari salah sebuah sekolah di Selangor. Subjek diberikan tiga masalah geometri untuk diselesaikan, iaitu: Melukis, Mengenal pasti, dan Mengasingkan. Di samping menyelesaikan masalah tersebut, subjek juga ditemu duga oleh pengkaji untuk meminta subjek menerangkan hasil penyelesaian mereka. Daripada tingkahlaku dan penerangan semasa subjek menyelesaikan masalah dalam geometri, peringkat-peringkat van Hiele akan dikenal pasti. Kajian ini diharapkan dapat membantu para guru mengenal pasti peringkat kefahaman pelajar mereka dalam geometri. Dengan itu, guru dapat merancang pengajaran geometri dengan lebih baik.

Item Type:Journal
Additional Information:This note was added by the search_and_modify.pl script.
Keywords:Geometry, Mathematics, Study and teaching
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:5284

1. Burger, W. F. (1982). Using the van Hiele model to describe reasoning processes in geometry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Research Association, New Orleans, L.A.

2. Burger, W. F., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics, 17, 31-48.

3. Clement, K. (1982). Visual imagery and school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2, 33 - 38.

4. Cobb, P., & Steffe, L. P. (1983). The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 83—94.

5. Collier, C. P. (1998). By way of introduction geometry. Mathematics Teaching in The Middle School, 3(6), 387.

6. Cox, P. (1985). Formal Geometry — More is Needed. Mathematics Teacher, 78, 404-405.

7. Fuys, D., Geddes, D., & Tischler, R. (1985). An investigation of the van Hiele model of thinking in geometry: Final Report. Brooklyn: Brooklyn College.

8. Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, California, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.

9. Hoffer, A. (1981). Geometry is more than proof. Mathematics Teacher, 74, 11-18.

10. Hoffer, A. (1983). van Hiele-based research. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and process (pp. 205-228). New York: Academic Press.

11. Mayberry, J. (1983). The van Hiele levels of geometric thought in undergraduate preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 14, 58-69.

12. Mc Donald, J. (1989). Formal operations and the ability of students to structure geometric content. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Jean Piaget Society, Philadelphia.

13. National Council of Teacher of Mathematics, Commission on Standards for School Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

14. National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics (1980). The teaching of geometry. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.

15. Noraini Idris (1999). Linguistic aspects of mathematical education: How precise do teachers need to be? In M. A. Clement (Ed), Cultural and language aspects of science, mathematics, and technical education (pp. 280-289). Brunei: Universiti Brunei Darussalam.

16. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research. California: Sage Publication, Inc.

17. Sherard, P. (1981). Rational number concepts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 323 — 341.

18. van Hiele, P. M. (1959). Development and the learning process. Acta Pedagogical Ultrajectina (pp.1-31). Groningen: J.B. Wolters.

19. van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. New York: Academic Press.

20. van Hiele, P. M. (1988). Foreword. In D. Fuys, d. Geddes, & R. Tischler, The van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents (pp. iii-iv). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

21. van Hiele, P. M., & van Hiele-Geldof, D. (1958). A method of initiation into geometry at secondary schools. In H. Freudenthal (Ed.), Report on methods of initiation into geometry (pp. 67-80). Gronigen: Qolters.

22. Wirszup, I. (1976). Breakthroughs in the psychology of learning and teaching geometry. In. J. L. Martin & D. A. Bradbard (Eds), Space and geomefry: Papers from a research workshop (pp. 75-97). Columbus, OH: ERIC Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.