Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Kesan Strategi Pembelajaran Koperatif terhadap Prestasi Pelajar dalam Pendidikan Perakaunan

Suhaida Abdul Kadir, and Zaidatul Akmaliah Lope Pihie, and Noran Fauziah Yaakub, and Habibah Elias, and Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi, (2006) Kesan Strategi Pembelajaran Koperatif terhadap Prestasi Pelajar dalam Pendidikan Perakaunan. Jurnal Pendidikan, 26 (Malay Language Version) . pp. 37-61. ISSN 01265261

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
171Kb

Affiliations

Universiti Putra Malaysia. Faculty of Educational Studies
Universiti Putra Malaysia. Faculty of Educational Studies
Universiti Putra Malaysia. Faculty of Educational Studies
Universiti Putra Malaysia. Faculty of Educational Studies
Universiti Putra Malaysia. Faculty of Educational Studies

Abstract

A quasi-experimental study was conducted at four academic schools in Hulu Langat, Selangor. The objectives of the study were to determine the effectiveness of cooperative learning strategy in accounting subject towards students‘ performances and their perceptions towards the cooperative learning strategy. Five classes (n = 122) used cooperative learning strategy for eight weeks and four other equivalent classes (n = 86) were made the control group. A test was conducted before the experiment to obtain the covariate score. Students‘ performances were measured after the treatment. Students’ perceptions were obtained using open-ended questions. The findings of the study show that the students in the cooperative learning group have higher posttest scores compared to the control group. The implications of the study and suggestions for implementing cooperative learning strategy are also discussed.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Accounting, Study and teaching in schools, Malaysia, Selangor, Hulu Langat, Collaborative learning
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:5293

1. Abekah, J., Maher, E., & Maher, R. (1996). Students’ perceptions towards accounting: The effects of the first university accounting course. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 38(3), 167-179.

2. Abrami, P. C., Chambers, B., Poulsen, C., De Simone, C., D’Apollonia, S., & Howden, J. (1995). Classroom connections: Understanding and using cooperative learning. New York: Harcourt.

3. Beegle, J., & Coffee, D. (1991). Accounting instructors’ perceptions of how they teach versus how they were taught. Journal of Education for Business, 66(8), 90-94.

4. Berg, B. L. (1998). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

5. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Dalam N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (ms. 171-246). Chicago: Rand McNally.

6. Chang, Chun-Yen, & Mao, Song-Ling. (1999). The effects on students’ cognitive achievement when using the cooperative learning method in earth science classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 99(7), 374-380.

7. Choong, L. G. (1995). Cooperative learning in the ESL writing class. Tesis Sarjana Muda, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor.

8. Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

9. Coelho, E. (1994). Learning together in the multicultural classroom. Ontario: Pippin.

10. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.

11. Cook, T. M., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton.

12. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. Dalam N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13. Duren, P. E., & Cherrington, A. (1992). The effects of cooperative group work versus independent practice on the learning of some problem-solving strategies. School Science and Mathematics, 92(2), 80-83.

14. Emore, J., & Cress, J. (1989). Accounting education: A time for change. Journal of Education for Business, 64(8) 361-365.

15. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in education (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

16. Habibah Elias. (1992). Strategi pengajaran ekonomi KBSM. Kuala Lumpur: Fajar Bakti.

17. Halimah bt. Harun. (1992). Sikap dan pencapaian dalam perakaunan dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Tesis M.Ed, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor.

18. Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1994). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Houghton.

19. Holter, N. C. (1994). Team assignments can be effective cooperative learning techniques. Journal of Education for Business, 69, 73-76.

20. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1998). Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory: Social psychological applications to social issues. Dimuat turun (t.t) daripada http://www.clcrc.com/pages/SIT.html

21. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Johnson, J., & Anderson, D. (1976). Effects of cooperative versus individualized instruction on student prosocial behavior, attitudes toward learning, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(4), 446-452.

22. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Scott, L. (1978). The effects of cooperative and individualized instruction on student attitudes and achievement. Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 207-216.

23. Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 47-62.

24. Johnson, D. W., Skon, L., & Johnson, R. (1980). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic conditions on children’s problem solving performance. American Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 83-83.

25. King, A. (1990). Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioning. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 64-687.

26. Lindquist, T. M. (1995). Traditional versus contemporary goals and methods in accounting education: Bridging the gap with cooperative learning. Journal of Education for Business, 70, 278-284.

27. Mok, S. S. (1997). Pedagogi 2: Pelaksanaan pengajaran. Selangor: Budiman.

28. Neuman, W. L. (1991). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

29. Newmann, F. M., & Thompson, J. (1987). Effects of cooperative learning on achievement in secondary schools: A summary of research. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, National Center of Effective Secondary Schools.

30. Ong, E. T. (1994). The effect of cooperative learning on the mathematics achievement of form 4 students in Simpang secondary school in Malaysia. Tesis M.Ed, University of Houston/IAB.

31. Peterson, P. L., & Swing, S. R. (1985). Students’ cognitions as mediators of the effectiveness of small-group learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 299-312.

32. Ross, J. A., & Raphael, D. (1990). Communication and problem solving achievement in cooperative learning groups. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(2), 149-164.

36. Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effect on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 241-271.

37. Sharifah Md. Nor, & Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie. (1990). Guru perdagangan dan keusahawanan: Satu tinjauan profil dan pandangan terhadap kerja. Jurnal Pendidikan, 16, 37-44.

38. Siti Rahayah Ariffin (1998). Isu-isu pengajaran dan pembelajaran secara koperatif bagi mata pelajaran sains sekolah bestari. Kertas kerja yang dibentangkan dalam Seminar Isu-Isu Pendidikan Negara anjuran Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 26 - 27 November, 1998.

39. Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94(3), 429-445.

40. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Cooperative learning: Where behavioral and humanistic approaches to classroom motivation meet. The Elementary School Journal, 88(1), 29-37.

41. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

42. Slavin, R. E. (1994). Using student team learning (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Team Learning Project.

43. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning among students: Theory, research, and implications for active learning. Dimuat turun (t.t) daripada http://www.scov.csos.jhu.edu/sfa/cooplearn.htm

44. Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 433-69.

45. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1995). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques. London: Sage.

46. Suhaida Abdul Kadir, Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie, Noran Fauziah Yaacob, Habibah Elias, & Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi (2004). Kesan pembelajaran koperatif terhadap konsep kendiri akademik di dalam Pendidikan Perakaunan. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 12(2), 151-161.

47. Tudge, J. (1990). Vygotsky, the zone of proximal development, and peer collaboration: Implications for the classroom practice. Dalam L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (ms. 155-172). New York: Cambridge UP.

48. Webb, N. M. (1982). Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 421-445.

49. Whicker, K. M., Bol, L., & Nunnery, J. A. (1997). Cooperative learning in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Research, 91(1), 42-48.

50. Woolfolk, A. E. (1995). Educational psychology (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

51. Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie, & Sharifah Md. Nor. (1990). Proses pengaliran di sekolah menengah rendah dan kesannya terhadap status mata pelajaran elektif. Jurnal Pendidikan, 13, 53-66.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.