Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Penyoalan Guru: Pemangkin Pemikiran Aras Tinggi Murid

Supramani, S., (2006) Penyoalan Guru: Pemangkin Pemikiran Aras Tinggi Murid. Jurnal Pendidikan, 26 (Malay Language Version) . pp. 225-246. ISSN 01265261

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
141Kb

Affiliations

University od Malaya. Faculty of Language and Linguistics

Abstract

Questions are nothing new to teachers. They are most commonly used in everyday communications. Pedagogically, teachers have used questions ever since the first known formal education classes conducted by Socrates. Researchers have been asking questions about questioning ever since the first study carried out by Stevens (1912). Early work focused on describing the frequency, rate and type of question that teachers asked. Recent researches are focusing on the effect of questions on students’ achievement, attitude or rates of participation. This article examines the cognitive levels of questions asked by the Year Five teachers and cognitive levels of responses elicited from the pupils during reading and comprehension lessons. It investigates the relationship between the cognitive levels of teachers‘ questions and pupils‘ responses. The findings show a significant relationship between teachers’ questions and pupils’ responses. Asking higher-order questions elicit higher-order responses and lower-order questions elicit lower-order responses.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Questionning approach to learning
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:5307

1. Bahagian Pendidikan Guru. (1993). Model persediaan mengajar pengajaran pembelajaran KBKK. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

2. Bahagian Pendidikan Guru (1994, January). Module for the training course on Developing Critical Thinking Through Effective Questioning. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

3. Bloom, B. S. (ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.

4. Dillon, J. T. (1988c). Questioning and teaching: A manual of practice. London: Croom.

5. Gall, M. D. (1970). The use of questions in teaching. Review of Education Research, 40(5), 707-721.

6. Gall, M. D., & Rhody, T. (1987). Review of research on questioning techniques. Dlm. W. Wilen (ed.), Questions, questioning techniques, and effective teaching. Washington, DC: National Education Association.

7. Hare, V. C., & Pulliam, C. A. (1980). Teacher questioning: A verification and an extension. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 12(1), 69-72.

8. Hunkins, F. P. (1989). Teaching thinking through effective questioning. Boston: Gordon.

9. Institut Bahasa Melayu Malaysia. (1999). Kajian pemilihan dan penggunaan bahan pengajaran bacaan oleh guru-guru Bahasa Melayu Sekolah Rendah Tahap II. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Bahasa.

10. Kindsvatter, R., Wilen, W., & Ishler, M. (1992). Dynamics of effective teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

11. Lamb, W. G., (1976). Ask a higher-level question. Get a higher-level answer. The Science Teacher, 43(4), 22-23.

12. Levin, T., & Long, R. (1981). Effective instruction. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

13. Lembaga Peperiksaan. (2004). Format pentaksiran Bahasa Melayu mulai SPM 2004. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

14. Lembaga Peperiksaan. (2005a). Format pentaksiran Bahasa Melayu PMR mulai 2005. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

15. Lembaga Peperiksaan. (2005b) Format pentaksiran Bahasa Melayu UPSR mulai 2005. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

16. Onosko, J. J., & Newmann, F.M. (1994). Creating more thoughtful learning environments. Dlm J. N. Mangieri & C. Block (Ed.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.

17. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (1993). Kemahiran berfikir: Konsep, model dan strategi pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan.

18. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2001). Kemahiran berflkir dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan.

19. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2003). Sukatan pelajaran Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Rendah, Bahasa Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan.

20. Smart School Project Team. (1997). The Malaysian smart school: An MSC flagship application - a conceptual blueprint. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education.

21. Stevens, R. (1912). The question as a measure of efficiency in instruction: A critical study of classroom practice. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College.

22. Swarts, R. (2003). Towards developing and implimenting a thinking curriculum. Keynote Address presented at the First Annual Thinking Qualities Initiative Conference, Hong Kong.

23. Wilen, W. W. (1995). A rationale for developing students’ critical thinking through questioning. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 10, 33-44.

24. Zevin, J. (1995). A guide on classroom testing (with emphasis on higher order questioning). UNESCO Participation Programme (Project No: 8152). Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.