Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 
 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

The Impact of Using Handheld Technology on Students Attitude and Creativity in Mathematics

Noraini Idris, (2006) The Impact of Using Handheld Technology on Students Attitude and Creativity in Mathematics. Jurnal Pendidikan, 26 (English Version) . pp. 157-169. ISSN 01265261

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
84Kb

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Education.

Abstract

Penggunaan teknologi dalam pembelajaran matematik merupakan langkah ke arah mewujudkan masyarakat berteknologi selaras dengan hasrat Wawasan 2020. Kreativiti dalam matematik boleh membantu pelajar memahami dunia di sekeliling mereka dan memperkembangkan potensi mereka untuk mencapai kejayaan. Mereka belajar untuk menaakul, mengkaitkan pendapat dan berfikir secara logik. Dalam artikel ini penulis akan membincangkan tentang definisi kreativiti, penggunaan teknologi sebagai bahan bentuk pengajaran dan memaparkan dapatan kajian ke atas kesan penggunaan teknologi seperti kalkulator grafik terhadap kreativiti dalam matematik. Sampel kajian melibatkan seramai 107 pelajar Tingkatan Empat. Kumpulan rawatan menggunakan kalkulator TI-84 Plus dalam pembelajaran matematik, menjalani ujian kreativiti dan pengukuran sikap serta mengisi soal selidik mengenai persepsi terhadap penggunaan kalkulator dalam pembelajaran matematik. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan kegunaan kalkulator TI-84 Plus memupuk minat pelajar terhadap matematik, dan meningkatkan kreativiti pelajar dalam matematik.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Hand held technology, Schools, Malaysia, Coumputer aided instructions
Subjects:L Education
ID Code:5384

1. Brophy, J. (1990). Teaching social studies for understanding and higher order application. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 351-418.

2. Cairncross, A. (2000, July). The fostering of teaching-learning situations which promote the development of students into learners at universities. Paper presented at the 25th International Conference on The University of the Future and the Future of Universities: Learner-centred Universities for the New Millennium, Frankfurt, Germany.

3. Calfee, R. (1986). Those who can explain teach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

4. Cangelosi, J. S. (1996). Teaching mathematics in secondary and middle school: An interactive approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

5. Corcoran, K. (2000, November 28). Computers-in-school debate shifts to how to use them: Teachers strive to show what adding technology to classrooms can mean. San Jose Mercury News, p.1A.

6. Cox, M. J. (1997). The effects of Information Technology on student motivation: Final report. London: NCET/King’s College.

7. Craft, A. (2000). Creativity across the primary curriculum. London: Routledge.

8. Dunham, P. H., & Dick, T. P. (1994). Research on graphing calculators. Mathematics Teacher, 87, 440 - 445.

9. Evans, E. W. (1964). Measuring the ability of students to respond in creative mathematical situations at the late elementary and early junior high school level. Dissertation Abstracts International, 25, 7108.

10. Guilford. J. P. (1975), The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

11. Healy, J. M. (1994). Testing for creativity requires a definition of what it is. Brown University Child & Adolescent Behavior Letter, 10(12).

12. Kaput, J. J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research in mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.

13. Kohler, H. (1997). Acting artist-like in the classroom: Modern rational technological world comes to life through the creativity arising from the artistic paradigm of acting. ZDM29(3), 88-93.

14. Meissner, H. (2000). Creativity in Mathematics education. Retrieved July 5, 2005, from http://www.merel.org/products/csmp/frederique/asp.

15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

16. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Professional standards. Reston, VA: Author.

17. Noraini, I. (2001). Encouraging motivation to learn: Usage of graphing calculator in the Mathematics classroom. Paper presented at International Conference on Challenges and Prospects in Teacher Education, Kuala Lumpur.

18. Oxford English Dictionary. (1995). Oxford: Oxford UP.

19. Prouse, H. (1967, December). Creativity in school mathematics. The Mathematics Teacher, 60, 876-879.

20. Quigley, P. (1998). Creativity and computers: Retrieved October 12, 2005, from http://ericae.net/edo/ED315063 .htm

21. Rosenshine, B. (1987). Explicit teaching. In D. Berliner & B. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers (pp. 75-92). New York: Random House.

22. Saracho, O. (1990). The match and mismatch of teachers’ and students’ cognitive styles. Early Child Development and Care, 54, 99-109.

23. Schifter, L. (1999). Definitions of creativity. Retrieved June 4, 2005, from: http://members.ozemail.com.au~caveman/Creative/Basics/definitions.html

24. Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151-158.

25. Standler, R. B. (1998). Creativity in science and engineering. Retrieved April 5, 2005, from http://www.rbs0.com/create.htm.

26. Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Technical norms manual. Princeton, NJ: Personnel.

27. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Bensenville, IN: Personnel.

28. Torrance, E. P. (1982). Hemisphericity and creative functioning. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 15, 29-37.

Repository Staff Only: item control page
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2007 MyAIS Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya – All Rights Reserved. Malaysian Abstracting and Indexing System is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.