Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

The Assessment of Immediate Post-operative Scoliosis Correction Using Pedicle Screw System by Utilising the Fulcrum Bending Technique

Chan, C.Y.W., and Kwan, M.K., and Saravanan, S., and Saw, L.B., and Deepak, A.S., (2007) The Assessment of Immediate Post-operative Scoliosis Correction Using Pedicle Screw System by Utilising the Fulcrum Bending Technique. Medical Journal of Malaysia, 62 (1). pp. 33-35. ISSN 0300-5283

Full text not available from this repository.

Affiliations

University of Malaya Medical Centre. Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery.
University of Malaya Medical Centre. Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery.
University of Malaya Medical Centre. Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery.
University of Malaya Medical Centre. Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery.
University of Malaya Medical Centre. Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery.

Abstract

Assessment of the curve flexibility is a crucial step in a surgeon’s pre-operative planning for scoliosis surgery. Many techniques have been described. These include traction films, supine side bending films, push prone techniques, traction under general anaesthesia as well as fulcrum bending film. In this study, we studied the pre- and immediate post-operative radiographs of twenty eight adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients who were corrected using pedicle screw systems between January 2004 and August 2006. There were twenty two females and six male patients. The mean age of the patients were 17.5 years with a range of 12 to 38 years. Skeletal maturity of the patients was assessed by Risser’s score. The majority was Risser 4 (15 cases, 53.6%). Based on King and Moe’s classification, the most common curve was type 3 curve (15 cases, 53.6%). Among the twenty eight patients, twenty three patients underwent only posterior correction, while 5 patients underwent additional anterior release surgery. The mean pre-operative Cobb’s angle for the posterior surgery group was 65.5 ± 13.9° and the mean post-operative Cobb’s angle was 32.9 ± 12.6°. There was no difference between the mean correction estimated by fulcrum bending films (Fulcrum Flexibility) and the post-operative Correction Rate figures (44.2% vs. 49.9%). The mean Fulcrum Bending Correction index (FBCI) in this group of patients is 112.8%. In the group of patients who underwent additional anterior release, their curves were noted to be larger and less flexible with the mean pre-operative Cobb’s angle and Fulcrum Flexibility of 90.4° ± 9.3° and 23.4% respectively. The Fulcrum Bending Correction Index (FBCI) for this group of patients was significantly higher than the posterior surgery group: i.e. 164.0% vs 112.8%. Thus, anterior release does help to improve the correction significantly. The fulcrum bending films give good pre-operative estimation of the amount of correction to be expected post-operatively. The fulcrum bending films can help to identify the curve types which might require anterior release in order to improve the scoliosis correction. Using the Fulcrum Bending Correction Index (FBCI) will also enable surgeons to quantify more accurately the amount of correction achieved by taking into account the inherent flexibility of the spine.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Scoliosis, Pedicle Screw System and Fulcrum Bending Index
Subjects:R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:5896

1. Davis BJ, Gadgil A, Trivedi J, Ahmed EB. Traction radiography performed under general anesthetic: a new technique for assessing idiopathic scoliosis curve. Spine 2004; 29(21): 2466-70.

2. Klepps SJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Bassett GS, Whorton, J. Prospective comparison of flexibility radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001; 26(5): E74-E79.

3. Polly D, Sturm P, Traction versus supine side-bending. Which technique best determines curve flexibility? Spine 1998; 23(7): 804-8.

4. Vaughan JJ, Winter RB, Lonstein, JE. Comparison of the use of supine bending and traction radiographs in the selection of the fusion area in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1996; 21(21): 2469-73.

5. Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Linville DL. Comparison of push- prone and lateral-bending radiographs for predicting postoperative coronal alignment in thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosic curves. Spine 2000; 25(1): 76.

6. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J, Bridwell KH, Cho SK, Cheh G, Sides B. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006; 31(3): 291-98.

7. Cheung KMC, Luk KDK. Prediction of correction of scoliosis with use of the fulcrum bending radiograph. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997; 79: 1144-50.

8. King HA, Moe JH, Bradford D, Winter RB. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1983; 65: 1302-13.

9. Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel V, Federico D, Oxland T, Duranceau J. Thoracic human vertebrae: quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 1991; 16(8): 888-901.

10. Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee SM, Kim JH, Chung ER. Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: are they really safe? Spine 2001; 26(18): 2047-59.

11. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Sides B, Blanke K. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004; 29(18): 2040-48.

12. Luk KDK, Cheung KMC, Lu DS, Leong JCY. Assessment of scoliosis correction in relation to flexibility using the fulcrum bending correction index. Spine 1998;23(21):2303-7.

13. Liljenqvist UR, Halm HFH, Link TM. Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1997; 22(19): 2239-45.

14. Suk S, Lee CK, Kim W, Chung Y, Park Y. Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1995; 20: 1399-405.

Repository Staff Only: item control page