Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » By Affiliations
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top 20 Journal Cited
 » Top 20 Cited
 » Top 20 Author Cited
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Ethical Use of Information – How University Students Fare

Szarina Abdullah, and Nor Rashimahwati Tarmuchi, and Norliya Ahmad Kassim, and Mohd. Sharif Mohd. Saad, and Rasimah Aripin, (2007) Ethical Use of Information – How University Students Fare. In: Building An Information Society For All: Proceedings of the International Conference on Libraries, Information and Society, ICOLIS 2007, 26-27 June 2007, Armada Hotel, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia. ISBN 9789834349103.

Full text not available from this repository.

Affiliations

Universiti Teknologi MARA, Faculty of Information Management
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Faculty of Information Management
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Faculty of Information Management
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Faculty of Information Management
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Faculty of Information Technology & Quantitative Sciences

Abstract

Ethical use of information is an important component of information literacy, particularly among university students. This paper reports on the finding of a study conducted among university students to identify their information literacy (IL) competency, with specific attention on “Ethical use of information”. The study used a self-administered questionnaire as the instrument for data collection. Respondents were 1,100 final year students from various disciplines from 4 public and 2 private universities in the Klang Valley of Malaysia. The level of competency was measured by students’ ability to identify 3 main things: a) which types of information use require users to acknowledge the information sources, b) which activities are considered plagiarism, and c) which types of information are considered copyrighted. Students need to answer13 item questions. Each answer was assigned scores for the purpose of computing competency levels, namely: 0=wrong answer, 1=beginner, 2=intermediate, 3=advanced. Results of the analysis revealed that majority of the respondents’ competency fall under the beginner level (43.4%), followed by the intermediate level (38.0%), and advanced level (18.6%). Other interesting results are obtained by cross-tabulating competency data against various characteristics, such as their information-related activities in the library, the nature of academic assignments, the type of information skills course they have attended, the university where they attended, and other demographic variables. Implications from findings are discussed.

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Additional Information:Edited by Abrizah Abdullah et al. Kuala Lumpur: Library and Information Unit, Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, University of Malaya, 2007. ISBN:9789834349103.
Keywords:Information literacy evaluation in Malaysia, Information ethics, University students.
Subjects:Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Science
ID Code:59

American Library Association, Association College and Research Libraries. 2004. Information Literacy Competency Standards For Higher Education. Chicago: ALA.Available at: http://www.ala.org/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracy competency.htm.

Brown, C and L. R Krumholz. 2002. Integrating information literacy into the science curriculum. College and Research Libraries, Vol. 63, no.2: 111-123

Brown, Cecelia M. 1999. Information Literacy of Physical Science Graduate Students in the Information Age. College & Research Libraries, Vol.60, no.5: 426-438.

Bruce, C. S. and P.C. Candy. 2000. Information Literacy around the world: advances in programs and research. Wagga Wagga, NSW : Charles Sturt University.

Bruce, C. S. 2002. Information literacy as a catalyst for educational change ....prepared for UNESCO, and the National Forum on Information Literacy. Available at: http://www.nclis.gov.libinter/infolitconf&meet/papers/

Bulaong, G., Hoch, H.and R. Matthews. 2003. Information Literacy Scoring Rubric. In Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago: ACRL. Available at: http://www.ala.org/acrl/acrlstandards/information literacycompetency.htm

Bundy, A. 2002. Growing the community of the informed: information literacy- a global issue. Available at: : http://www.unisa.edu.au/papers/

Case-Smith, Jane and Carol A Powell. 2003. Information literacy skills of Occupational Therapy graduates: a survey of learning outcomes. Journal of the Medical Library Association. Vol. 91, no.4 :468-477

Chan Sai Noi. 2003. Making information literacy a compulsory subject for undergraduates: the experience of the University of Malaya. Paper presented at the 69th. World Library and Information Congress, August 2003, Berlin, Germany.

Che Norma Bahri. 2004. Program literasi maklumat di perpustakaan akademik : satu tinjauan kaedah dan pencapaian. Paper presented at Seminar Kebangsaan Perpustakaan di Malaysia, May 2004 at Langkawi, Malaysia.

Corral, S. and H Hathaway,. editors. 2000. Seven Pillars of Wisdom? Good Practice in Information Literacy Skills Development. Proceedings of the Conference held at the University of Warwick, 6-7 June. London, Society for College, National and University Libraries (SCONUL)

Correia, A.M.R. 2002. Information literacy for an active and effective citizenship. Available at: http://www.nclis.gov.libinter/infolitconf&meet/papers/

Fowler, Claras. 2000. What have we done? TILT’s Impact on our instruction program. Reference Services Review, Vol. 28, no.4 : 15-20.

Hepworth, Mark. 1999. A study of undergraduate information literacy and skills: the inclusion of information literacy and skills in the undergraduate curriculum. Paper presented at the 65th IFLA Council and General Conference, August 1995, Bangkok, Thailand.

International Federation of Library Associations(IFLA). 2004. Round Table on User Education. The Hague, IFLA. Available at: http://www.ifla.org.VII/ s42/

Juhana Salim. 2000. Program literasi maklumat di IPT dalam era digital. Presented at Seminar Perpustakaan dan Pustakawan : satu anjakan paradigma, August 2000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Kunkel, Lilith R., Susan Weaver, and Kim N. Cook. 1996. What do they know? An Assessment of undergraduate library skills. The Journal of Academic Librarianship,Vol. 22:430-434.

Maughan, Davitt Patricia. 2001. Assessing Information Literacy among Undergraduates: A discussion of the literature at the University of California – Berkeley. College & Research Libraries. Vol. 62, no.1:71-82.

Mohd Sharif Mohd Saad and Zainab A.N. 2004. The Internet as a Resource for Final Year Project. Paper presented at the Conference on Information Literacy- Information, Learning, Innovation: Delivering Global Knowledge, October 2004, Brunei Darulsalam.

Mohd Sharif Mohd Saad, N.N. Edzan and Zainab A.N. 2005. Assessing learning outcomes of information literacy programmes: Malaysian academic libraries. Paper presented at the International Conference on Libraries: Towards a Knowledge Society, November 2005, Penang, Malaysia.

Mohd Sharif Mohd Saad 2006. Information literacy and information seeking behaviour among students undertaking their final year projects. PhD. Research in progress, Universiti Malaya.

Nero, R. Lut 1999. An assessment of information literacy among graduating teacher education majors of four Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education (SSHE)universities. PhD Thesis. University.of Pittsburgh.

Nor Edzan Haji Che Nasir 2006. Modeling an information literacy programme for undergraduates: a soft systems methodology approach. PhD. Research in progress, Universiti Malaya.

Repository Staff Only: item control page