Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Diagnosing Angina Using a Simple Neural Network Architecture

Bulgiba, A.M., (2006) Diagnosing Angina Using a Simple Neural Network Architecture. Journal of the University of Malaya Medical Centre (JUMMEC), 9 (1). pp. 39-43. ISSN 1823-7339

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
63Kb

Official URL: http://jummec.um.edu.my

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Medicine. Dept. of Social and Preventive Medicine

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to research the use of a simple neural network in diagnosing angina in patients complaining of chest pain. A total of 887 records were extracted from the electronic medical record system (EMR) in Selayang Hospital, Malaysia. Simple neural networks (simple perceptrons) were built and trained using a subset of 470 records with and without pre-processing using principal components analysis (PCA). These were subsequently tested on another subset of 417 records. Average sensitivity of 80.75% (95% CI 79.54%, 81.96%), specificity of 41.64% (95% CI 40.13%, 43.15%), PPV of 46.73% (95% CI 45.20%, 48.26%) and NPV of 77.39% (95% CI 76.11%, 78.67%) were achieved with the simple perceptron. When PCA pre-processing was used, the perceptrons had a sensitivity of 1.43% (95% CI 1.06%, 1.80%), specificity of 98.32% (95% CI 97.92%, 98.72%), PPV of 32.95% (95% CI 31.51%, 34.39%) and NPV of 61.33% (95% CI 59.84%, 62.82%). These results show that it is possible for a simple neural network to have respectable sensitivity and specificity levels for angina.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:angina, diagnosis, prediction, decision-support, neural networks, perceptrons
Subjects:R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:6365

1. Fallon EM, Roques J.Acute chest pain.AACN Clin Issues 1997; 8(3): 383-97.

2. Kelly CNM, Stanner SA. Diet and cardiovascular disease in the UK: are the messages getting across? Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 2003; 62(3): 583-589.

3. Ellenius J, Groth T. Methods for selection of adequate neural network structures with application to early assessment of chest pain patients by biochemical monitoring. Int J Med Inform 2000; 57(2-3): 181-202.

4. Ellenius J, Groth T. Transferability of neural networkbased decision-support algorithms for early assessment of chest pain patients. Int J Med Inform 2000; 60(1): 1-20.

5. Kukar M, Kononenko I, Groselj C, et al. Analyzing and improving the diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease with machine learning.Artif Intell Med 1999; 16(1): 25-50.

6. Long WJ, Fraser H, Naimi S. Reasoning requirements for diagnosis of heart disease. Artif Inell Med 1997;10(1):5-24.

7. Wang SJ, Ohno-Machado L, Fraser HSF, et al. Using patient-reportable clinical history factors to predict myocardial infarction. Comput Biol Med 2001; 31(1):1-13.

8. Baxt WG, Shofer FS, Sites FD, et al. A neural network aid for the early diagnosis of cardiac ischaemia in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 40(6): 575-583.

9. Baxt WG, Shofer FS, Sites FD, et al. A neural computational aid to the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 39(4): 366-373.

Repository Staff Only: item control page