Author, Subjects, Keywords

Cited Author

 

 
   » By Author or Editor
 » Browse Author by Alphabet
 » By Journal
 » By Subjects
 » Malaysian Journals
 » By Type
 » By Year
 » By Latest Additions
 
 
   » By Author
 » Top 20 Authors
 » Top 20 Article
 » Top Journal Cited
 » Top Article Cited
 » Journal Citation Statistics
 » Usage Since Sept 2007


 
 
 

Login | Create Account

Early Results of Rotating Platform Total Knee Replacement

Arif M., and Makundala, V., and Choon, S.K. David, (2005) Early Results of Rotating Platform Total Knee Replacement. Medical Journal of Malaysia, 60 (Supplement C). pp. 99-103. ISSN 0300-5283

Full text not available from this repository.

Affiliations

Hyderabad Medical Complex, Pakistan. Post Graduate Medical Institute. Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery.
University Malaya Medical Centre. Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery. Adult Reconstruction Surgical Unit.
University Malaya Medical Centre. Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery. Adult Reconstruction Surgical Unit.

Abstract

We report on our early experiences with the Press Fit Condylar Rotating Platform (PFC-RP) total knee replacement prosthesis at University Malaya Medical Centre. This new prosthesis was introduced to Malaysia in 2001. It combines the rotating platform technology of Low Contact Stress (LCS) and the modularity of Press Fit Condylar (PFC) system. We performed 18 knee replacements using cruciate retaining prosthesis without patellar resurfacing in 10 patients and followed them up over a period of 16-month. A new operative strategy was developed to match the flexion and extension gaps. The pre- and post-operative assessments were made according to the American Knee Society Scores (AKSS). Post-operative pain relief, range of motion, knee score and functional score showed promising early results. The average knee rating improved from 28 to 91 (range 75-94). Average functional assessment improved from 26 to 82 (range 75-90). The radiographic assessments show correction of an average pre-operative varus of 140 to post-operative valgus of 50 (range 4-70). Early infection occurred in two knees. Both responded to aggressive debridement and antibiotics. Stiffness was encountered in one patient. There were no spinouts of the insert. We are satisfied that the implants are performing well at the one-year mark and will continue monitor this cohort.

Item Type:Journal
Keywords:Rotating platform, Mobile bearing, Total knee replacement
Subjects:R Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing
ID Code:6607

1. Kim YH, Kook HK, Kim JS. Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop. 2001; 392: 101-15.

2. Ranawat CS, Flynn WF, Saddler S et al. Long-term results of the total condylar arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop. 1993; 286: 94-102.

3. Rand JA, Ilstrup DM. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg. 1991. 73-A(3): 397-409.

4. D’Ambrosia R. 25 years of design, evolution, experience and cilinical success.Orthopedics. 2002; 25(Suppl 2).

5. Beuchel FF Sr, Beuchel FF Jr, Pappas MJ, D’Alessio J. Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop. 2001; 388: 41-50.

6. Vertullo CI, Easley ME, Scott WN, Insall IN. Mobile bearing in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001; 9(6): 355-64.

7. Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM. The effect of comformity, thickness and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1986; 68-A(7): 1041-51.

8. Bartel DL, Rawlinson JJ, Burstein AH et al. Stresses in polyethylene components of contemporary total knee replacements. Clin Orthop. 1995; 317: 76-82.

9. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. Low Contact Stress knee replacement system. Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings. Orthop Clin North Am. 1989; 20(2): 147-77.

10. Ligier R, Ratib O, Logean M, Girrard C. Osiris: a medical image manipulation system. MD Comput. 1994; 11(4): 212-8.

11. Gmen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. ‘Modes of Failure’ of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop. 1979; 141: 17-27.

12. Diduch DR, Insall IN, Scott WN et al. Total knee replacement in young active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg. 1997; 79-A(4): 575-82.

13. Goldberg VM, Figgie MP, Figgie HE et al. Use of total condylar prosthesis for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg.1988; 70-A(6): 802-11.

14. Engh GA. Failure of the polyethylene bearing surface of a total knee replacement within four years. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg. 1988; 70-A(7): 1093-6.

15. Schai PB, Thornhill TS, Scott RD. Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system Results at a minimum of ten years and survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998; 80-B(5): 850-8.

16. Sorrells RB. The rotating platform mobile-bearing TKA. Orthopaedics. 1996; 19(9): 793-6.

17. Rullkoetter PJ, Gabriel M, Colleran DP, Zalenski EB. The relationship between Contact Stress and Area with implications for TKR evaluation and design. In: ISTA, Oct 1-3, 1998; Marseille, France.

18. Kaper BP, Smith PN, Bourne RB et al. Mid-term results of a mobile bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 1999; 367: 201-9.

19. Sorrells RB. The clinical history and development of the low contact stress total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics, 2002; 25(Suppl 2): S207-12.

20. Laskin RS, O’Flynn HM. Total knee replacement with posterior cruciate ligament retention in rheumatoid arthritis. Problems and complications. Clin Orthop. 1997; 345: 24-8.

21. Maloney WJ, Schurman DJ. The effects of implant design on range of motion aftetotal knee arthroplasty. Total condylar versus posterior stabilized total condylar designs. Clin Orthop. 1992; 278: 147-52.

22. Mc Auley JP, Harrer MF, Ammeen D, Engh GA. Outcome of knee arthroplasty in patients with poor pre-operative range of motion. Clin Orthop. 2002; 404: 203-7.

23. Bert JM. Dislocation/subluxation of meniscal bearing elements after New Jersey Low Contact Stress total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1990; 254: 211-5.

Repository Staff Only: item control page